3D Simulations and MLT. I. Renzini's Critique

W David Arnett, Casey Meakin, Raphael Hirschi, Andrea Cristini, Cyril Georgy, Simon Campbell, Laura J.A. Scott, Etienne A. Kaiser, Maxime Viallet, Miroslav Mocák

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Renzini wrote an influential critique of "overshooting" in mixing-length theory (MLT), as used in stellar evolution codes, and concluded that three-dimensional fluid dynamical simulations were needed. Such simulations are now well tested. Implicit large eddy simulations connect large-scale stellar flow to a turbulent cascade at the grid scale, and allow the simulation of turbulent boundary layers, with essentially no assumptions regarding flow except the number of computational cells. Buoyant driving balances turbulent dissipation for weak stratification, as in MLT, but with the dissipation length replacing the mixing length. The turbulent kinetic energy in our computational domain shows steady pulses after 30 turnovers, with no discernible diminution; these are caused by the necessary lag in turbulent dissipation behind acceleration. Interactions between coherent turbulent structures give multi-modal behavior, which drives intermittency and fluctuations. These cause mixing, which may justify use of the instability criterion of Schwarzschild rather than the Ledoux. Chaotic shear flow of turning material at convective boundaries causes instabilities that generate waves and sculpt the composition gradients and boundary layer structures. The flow is not anelastic; wave generation is necessary at boundaries. A self-consistent approach to boundary layers can remove the need for ad hoc procedures of "convective overshooting" and "semi-convection." In Paper II, we quantify the adequacy of our numerical resolution in a novel way, determine the length scale of dissipation - the "mixing length" - without astronomical calibration, quantify agreement with the four-fifths law of Kolmogorov for weak stratification, and deal with strong stratification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number18
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume882
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

dissipation
stratification
simulation
boundary layers
boundary layer
turbulent boundary layer
wave generation
adequacy
causes
shear flow
stellar evolution
large eddy simulation
intermittency
kinetic energy
turnover
cascades
convection
time lag
grids
calibration

Keywords

  • convection
  • stars: interiors
  • turbulence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Arnett, W. D., Meakin, C., Hirschi, R., Cristini, A., Georgy, C., Campbell, S., ... Mocák, M. (2019). 3D Simulations and MLT. I. Renzini's Critique. Astrophysical Journal, 882(1), [18]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab21d9

3D Simulations and MLT. I. Renzini's Critique. / Arnett, W David; Meakin, Casey; Hirschi, Raphael; Cristini, Andrea; Georgy, Cyril; Campbell, Simon; Scott, Laura J.A.; Kaiser, Etienne A.; Viallet, Maxime; Mocák, Miroslav.

In: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 882, No. 1, 18, 01.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arnett, WD, Meakin, C, Hirschi, R, Cristini, A, Georgy, C, Campbell, S, Scott, LJA, Kaiser, EA, Viallet, M & Mocák, M 2019, '3D Simulations and MLT. I. Renzini's Critique', Astrophysical Journal, vol. 882, no. 1, 18. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab21d9
Arnett WD, Meakin C, Hirschi R, Cristini A, Georgy C, Campbell S et al. 3D Simulations and MLT. I. Renzini's Critique. Astrophysical Journal. 2019 Sep 1;882(1). 18. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab21d9
Arnett, W David ; Meakin, Casey ; Hirschi, Raphael ; Cristini, Andrea ; Georgy, Cyril ; Campbell, Simon ; Scott, Laura J.A. ; Kaiser, Etienne A. ; Viallet, Maxime ; Mocák, Miroslav. / 3D Simulations and MLT. I. Renzini's Critique. In: Astrophysical Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 882, No. 1.
@article{8b1611ab066b41a186c65a7071473341,
title = "3D Simulations and MLT. I. Renzini's Critique",
abstract = "Renzini wrote an influential critique of {"}overshooting{"} in mixing-length theory (MLT), as used in stellar evolution codes, and concluded that three-dimensional fluid dynamical simulations were needed. Such simulations are now well tested. Implicit large eddy simulations connect large-scale stellar flow to a turbulent cascade at the grid scale, and allow the simulation of turbulent boundary layers, with essentially no assumptions regarding flow except the number of computational cells. Buoyant driving balances turbulent dissipation for weak stratification, as in MLT, but with the dissipation length replacing the mixing length. The turbulent kinetic energy in our computational domain shows steady pulses after 30 turnovers, with no discernible diminution; these are caused by the necessary lag in turbulent dissipation behind acceleration. Interactions between coherent turbulent structures give multi-modal behavior, which drives intermittency and fluctuations. These cause mixing, which may justify use of the instability criterion of Schwarzschild rather than the Ledoux. Chaotic shear flow of turning material at convective boundaries causes instabilities that generate waves and sculpt the composition gradients and boundary layer structures. The flow is not anelastic; wave generation is necessary at boundaries. A self-consistent approach to boundary layers can remove the need for ad hoc procedures of {"}convective overshooting{"} and {"}semi-convection.{"} In Paper II, we quantify the adequacy of our numerical resolution in a novel way, determine the length scale of dissipation - the {"}mixing length{"} - without astronomical calibration, quantify agreement with the four-fifths law of Kolmogorov for weak stratification, and deal with strong stratification.",
keywords = "convection, stars: interiors, turbulence",
author = "Arnett, {W David} and Casey Meakin and Raphael Hirschi and Andrea Cristini and Cyril Georgy and Simon Campbell and Scott, {Laura J.A.} and Kaiser, {Etienne A.} and Maxime Viallet and Miroslav Moc{\'a}k",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3847/1538-4357/ab21d9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "882",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 3D Simulations and MLT. I. Renzini's Critique

AU - Arnett, W David

AU - Meakin, Casey

AU - Hirschi, Raphael

AU - Cristini, Andrea

AU - Georgy, Cyril

AU - Campbell, Simon

AU - Scott, Laura J.A.

AU - Kaiser, Etienne A.

AU - Viallet, Maxime

AU - Mocák, Miroslav

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Renzini wrote an influential critique of "overshooting" in mixing-length theory (MLT), as used in stellar evolution codes, and concluded that three-dimensional fluid dynamical simulations were needed. Such simulations are now well tested. Implicit large eddy simulations connect large-scale stellar flow to a turbulent cascade at the grid scale, and allow the simulation of turbulent boundary layers, with essentially no assumptions regarding flow except the number of computational cells. Buoyant driving balances turbulent dissipation for weak stratification, as in MLT, but with the dissipation length replacing the mixing length. The turbulent kinetic energy in our computational domain shows steady pulses after 30 turnovers, with no discernible diminution; these are caused by the necessary lag in turbulent dissipation behind acceleration. Interactions between coherent turbulent structures give multi-modal behavior, which drives intermittency and fluctuations. These cause mixing, which may justify use of the instability criterion of Schwarzschild rather than the Ledoux. Chaotic shear flow of turning material at convective boundaries causes instabilities that generate waves and sculpt the composition gradients and boundary layer structures. The flow is not anelastic; wave generation is necessary at boundaries. A self-consistent approach to boundary layers can remove the need for ad hoc procedures of "convective overshooting" and "semi-convection." In Paper II, we quantify the adequacy of our numerical resolution in a novel way, determine the length scale of dissipation - the "mixing length" - without astronomical calibration, quantify agreement with the four-fifths law of Kolmogorov for weak stratification, and deal with strong stratification.

AB - Renzini wrote an influential critique of "overshooting" in mixing-length theory (MLT), as used in stellar evolution codes, and concluded that three-dimensional fluid dynamical simulations were needed. Such simulations are now well tested. Implicit large eddy simulations connect large-scale stellar flow to a turbulent cascade at the grid scale, and allow the simulation of turbulent boundary layers, with essentially no assumptions regarding flow except the number of computational cells. Buoyant driving balances turbulent dissipation for weak stratification, as in MLT, but with the dissipation length replacing the mixing length. The turbulent kinetic energy in our computational domain shows steady pulses after 30 turnovers, with no discernible diminution; these are caused by the necessary lag in turbulent dissipation behind acceleration. Interactions between coherent turbulent structures give multi-modal behavior, which drives intermittency and fluctuations. These cause mixing, which may justify use of the instability criterion of Schwarzschild rather than the Ledoux. Chaotic shear flow of turning material at convective boundaries causes instabilities that generate waves and sculpt the composition gradients and boundary layer structures. The flow is not anelastic; wave generation is necessary at boundaries. A self-consistent approach to boundary layers can remove the need for ad hoc procedures of "convective overshooting" and "semi-convection." In Paper II, we quantify the adequacy of our numerical resolution in a novel way, determine the length scale of dissipation - the "mixing length" - without astronomical calibration, quantify agreement with the four-fifths law of Kolmogorov for weak stratification, and deal with strong stratification.

KW - convection

KW - stars: interiors

KW - turbulence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072341218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072341218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/ab21d9

DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/ab21d9

M3 - Article

VL - 882

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 1

M1 - 18

ER -