A bottom-up approach to examining group-level communication patterns

A multilevel latent profile analysis of functional group interaction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Functional perspectives on small discussion groups often focus on either the individual or group level of analysis, but rarely both. Following Borgatta and Bales (1953), I argue that group-level constructs are built from individual actions, and that the distribution of different interaction profiles leads to group-level assessments that are sometimes different from, but based on, assessments made at the individual level. The current study applies multilevel latent profile analysis (MLPA) to a previously published data set to identify interaction profiles at the individual level and determine whether those profiles (a) are interdependent and (b) allow for the classification of groups. MLPA identified three interaction profiles at the individual level and, based on those profiles, two classes of groups emerged. Discussion addresses the impact of the findings on conceptualizing and studying small-group interactions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)202-225
Number of pages24
JournalHuman Communication Research
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

communication pattern
group interaction
Focus Groups
Functional groups
Communication
Group
interaction
group discussion
small group
Datasets

Keywords

  • Collective constructs
  • Functional communication
  • Group interaction
  • Multilevel latent profile analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Anthropology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{b7b374bdaacb407093357265f605077e,
title = "A bottom-up approach to examining group-level communication patterns: A multilevel latent profile analysis of functional group interaction",
abstract = "Functional perspectives on small discussion groups often focus on either the individual or group level of analysis, but rarely both. Following Borgatta and Bales (1953), I argue that group-level constructs are built from individual actions, and that the distribution of different interaction profiles leads to group-level assessments that are sometimes different from, but based on, assessments made at the individual level. The current study applies multilevel latent profile analysis (MLPA) to a previously published data set to identify interaction profiles at the individual level and determine whether those profiles (a) are interdependent and (b) allow for the classification of groups. MLPA identified three interaction profiles at the individual level and, based on those profiles, two classes of groups emerged. Discussion addresses the impact of the findings on conceptualizing and studying small-group interactions.",
keywords = "Collective constructs, Functional communication, Group interaction, Multilevel latent profile analysis",
author = "Bonito, {Joseph A}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/hcr/hqy020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "202--225",
journal = "Human Communication Research",
issn = "0360-3989",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A bottom-up approach to examining group-level communication patterns

T2 - A multilevel latent profile analysis of functional group interaction

AU - Bonito, Joseph A

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Functional perspectives on small discussion groups often focus on either the individual or group level of analysis, but rarely both. Following Borgatta and Bales (1953), I argue that group-level constructs are built from individual actions, and that the distribution of different interaction profiles leads to group-level assessments that are sometimes different from, but based on, assessments made at the individual level. The current study applies multilevel latent profile analysis (MLPA) to a previously published data set to identify interaction profiles at the individual level and determine whether those profiles (a) are interdependent and (b) allow for the classification of groups. MLPA identified three interaction profiles at the individual level and, based on those profiles, two classes of groups emerged. Discussion addresses the impact of the findings on conceptualizing and studying small-group interactions.

AB - Functional perspectives on small discussion groups often focus on either the individual or group level of analysis, but rarely both. Following Borgatta and Bales (1953), I argue that group-level constructs are built from individual actions, and that the distribution of different interaction profiles leads to group-level assessments that are sometimes different from, but based on, assessments made at the individual level. The current study applies multilevel latent profile analysis (MLPA) to a previously published data set to identify interaction profiles at the individual level and determine whether those profiles (a) are interdependent and (b) allow for the classification of groups. MLPA identified three interaction profiles at the individual level and, based on those profiles, two classes of groups emerged. Discussion addresses the impact of the findings on conceptualizing and studying small-group interactions.

KW - Collective constructs

KW - Functional communication

KW - Group interaction

KW - Multilevel latent profile analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064117471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064117471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/hcr/hqy020

DO - 10.1093/hcr/hqy020

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 202

EP - 225

JO - Human Communication Research

JF - Human Communication Research

SN - 0360-3989

IS - 2

ER -