A clitic analysis of locative particles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The syntactic status of locative particles such as shang 'on'., li 'in' has long been a problem in Chinese syntax. This paper reviews the properties of these particles and considers three approaches that have been proposed in the literature. We will show that all three approaches run into difficulty. We will then suggest that locative particles are best treated as clitics. They take the preceding NP as the scope and cliticize to the left. This analysis explains why locative particles cannot stand alone, why they do not behave exactly like nouns or postpositions, and it also gives the correct semantic interpretation for locative phrases containing complex NPs. Our analysis suggests that locative particles actually do not have a syntactic status; they are not assigned any syntactic category. Rather, they can be analyzed in a morphological theory which treats clitics as phrasal affixes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-70
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Chinese Linguistics
Volume26
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

syntax
semantics
interpretation
Particle
Locative
Clitics
Syntax
literature
Semantic Interpretation
Shang
Postposition
Affix
Nouns
Syntactic Category

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

A clitic analysis of locative particles. / Liu, Feng-Hsi -.

In: Journal of Chinese Linguistics, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.1998, p. 48-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{58213ff36c3b4ff298cf356ba6a52526,
title = "A clitic analysis of locative particles",
abstract = "The syntactic status of locative particles such as shang 'on'., li 'in' has long been a problem in Chinese syntax. This paper reviews the properties of these particles and considers three approaches that have been proposed in the literature. We will show that all three approaches run into difficulty. We will then suggest that locative particles are best treated as clitics. They take the preceding NP as the scope and cliticize to the left. This analysis explains why locative particles cannot stand alone, why they do not behave exactly like nouns or postpositions, and it also gives the correct semantic interpretation for locative phrases containing complex NPs. Our analysis suggests that locative particles actually do not have a syntactic status; they are not assigned any syntactic category. Rather, they can be analyzed in a morphological theory which treats clitics as phrasal affixes.",
author = "Liu, {Feng-Hsi -}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "48--70",
journal = "Journal of Chinese Linguistics",
issn = "0091-3723",
publisher = "Journal of Chinese Linguistics",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A clitic analysis of locative particles

AU - Liu, Feng-Hsi -

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - The syntactic status of locative particles such as shang 'on'., li 'in' has long been a problem in Chinese syntax. This paper reviews the properties of these particles and considers three approaches that have been proposed in the literature. We will show that all three approaches run into difficulty. We will then suggest that locative particles are best treated as clitics. They take the preceding NP as the scope and cliticize to the left. This analysis explains why locative particles cannot stand alone, why they do not behave exactly like nouns or postpositions, and it also gives the correct semantic interpretation for locative phrases containing complex NPs. Our analysis suggests that locative particles actually do not have a syntactic status; they are not assigned any syntactic category. Rather, they can be analyzed in a morphological theory which treats clitics as phrasal affixes.

AB - The syntactic status of locative particles such as shang 'on'., li 'in' has long been a problem in Chinese syntax. This paper reviews the properties of these particles and considers three approaches that have been proposed in the literature. We will show that all three approaches run into difficulty. We will then suggest that locative particles are best treated as clitics. They take the preceding NP as the scope and cliticize to the left. This analysis explains why locative particles cannot stand alone, why they do not behave exactly like nouns or postpositions, and it also gives the correct semantic interpretation for locative phrases containing complex NPs. Our analysis suggests that locative particles actually do not have a syntactic status; they are not assigned any syntactic category. Rather, they can be analyzed in a morphological theory which treats clitics as phrasal affixes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937188255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937188255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 48

EP - 70

JO - Journal of Chinese Linguistics

JF - Journal of Chinese Linguistics

SN - 0091-3723

IS - 1

ER -