A comparative biomechanical analysis of stand alone versus facet screw and pedicle screw augmented lateral interbody arthrodesis: An in vitro human cadaveric model

Ryan M. Kretzer, Camilo Molina, Nianbin Hu, Hidemasa Umekoji, Mhd-Ali - Baaj, Hassan Serhan, Bryan W. Cunningham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: Cadaveric biomechanical study. Objective: To investigate the kinematic response of a standalone lateral lumbar interbody cage compared with supplemental posterior fixation with either facet or pedicle screws after lateral discectomy. Summary of Background Data: Lateral interbody fusion is a promising minimally invasive fixation technique for lumbar interbody arthrodesis. The biomechanical stability of stand-alone cage placement compared with supplemental posterior fixation with either facet or bilateral pedicle screws remains unclear. Methods: A 6-degree of freedom spine simulator was used to test flexibility in 7 human cadaveric specimens. Flexion-extension, lateral-bending, and axial-rotation were tested in the intact condition, followed by destabilization through a lateral discectomy at L2-L3 and L4-L5. Specimens were then reconstructed at both operative segments in the following sequence: (1) lateral interbody cage placement; (2) either Discovery facet screws or the Viper F2 system using a transfacetpedicular trajectory randomized to L2-L3 or L4-L5; and (3) removal of facet screw fixation followed by placement of bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation. Acute range of motion (ROM) was quantified and analyzed. Results: All 4 reconstruction groups, including stand-alone interbody cage placement, bilateral Discovery facet screws, the Viper F2 system, and bilateral pedicle screw-rod stabilization, resulted in a significant decrease in acute ROM in all loading modes tested (P<0.05). There were no significant differences observed between the 4 instrumentation groups (P>0.05). Although not statistically significant, the Viper F2 system resulted in greatest reduction of acute ROM in both flexion-extension and axial rotation versus all other treatments (P>0.05). Conclusions: Stand-alone interbody cage placement results in a significant reduction in acute ROM at the operative segment in the absence of posterior supplemental fixation. If added fixation is desired, facet screw placement, including the Viper F2 facet screw system using an integrated compression washer and transfacet-pedicular trajectory, provides similar acute stability to the spinal segment compared with traditional bilateral pedicle screw fixation in the setting of lateral interbody cage deployment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E336-E343
JournalClinical Spine Surgery
Volume29
Issue number7
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Arthrodesis
Articular Range of Motion
Diskectomy
Phthiraptera
Biomechanical Phenomena
Spine
Pedicle Screws
In Vitro Techniques

Keywords

  • Facet screws
  • Lateral interbody fusion
  • Pedicle screws

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

A comparative biomechanical analysis of stand alone versus facet screw and pedicle screw augmented lateral interbody arthrodesis : An in vitro human cadaveric model. / Kretzer, Ryan M.; Molina, Camilo; Hu, Nianbin; Umekoji, Hidemasa; Baaj, Mhd-Ali -; Serhan, Hassan; Cunningham, Bryan W.

In: Clinical Spine Surgery, Vol. 29, No. 7, 2016, p. E336-E343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kretzer, Ryan M. ; Molina, Camilo ; Hu, Nianbin ; Umekoji, Hidemasa ; Baaj, Mhd-Ali - ; Serhan, Hassan ; Cunningham, Bryan W. / A comparative biomechanical analysis of stand alone versus facet screw and pedicle screw augmented lateral interbody arthrodesis : An in vitro human cadaveric model. In: Clinical Spine Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 29, No. 7. pp. E336-E343.
@article{31ef000e2c20496385a8246ec90629f2,
title = "A comparative biomechanical analysis of stand alone versus facet screw and pedicle screw augmented lateral interbody arthrodesis: An in vitro human cadaveric model",
abstract = "Study Design: Cadaveric biomechanical study. Objective: To investigate the kinematic response of a standalone lateral lumbar interbody cage compared with supplemental posterior fixation with either facet or pedicle screws after lateral discectomy. Summary of Background Data: Lateral interbody fusion is a promising minimally invasive fixation technique for lumbar interbody arthrodesis. The biomechanical stability of stand-alone cage placement compared with supplemental posterior fixation with either facet or bilateral pedicle screws remains unclear. Methods: A 6-degree of freedom spine simulator was used to test flexibility in 7 human cadaveric specimens. Flexion-extension, lateral-bending, and axial-rotation were tested in the intact condition, followed by destabilization through a lateral discectomy at L2-L3 and L4-L5. Specimens were then reconstructed at both operative segments in the following sequence: (1) lateral interbody cage placement; (2) either Discovery facet screws or the Viper F2 system using a transfacetpedicular trajectory randomized to L2-L3 or L4-L5; and (3) removal of facet screw fixation followed by placement of bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation. Acute range of motion (ROM) was quantified and analyzed. Results: All 4 reconstruction groups, including stand-alone interbody cage placement, bilateral Discovery facet screws, the Viper F2 system, and bilateral pedicle screw-rod stabilization, resulted in a significant decrease in acute ROM in all loading modes tested (P<0.05). There were no significant differences observed between the 4 instrumentation groups (P>0.05). Although not statistically significant, the Viper F2 system resulted in greatest reduction of acute ROM in both flexion-extension and axial rotation versus all other treatments (P>0.05). Conclusions: Stand-alone interbody cage placement results in a significant reduction in acute ROM at the operative segment in the absence of posterior supplemental fixation. If added fixation is desired, facet screw placement, including the Viper F2 facet screw system using an integrated compression washer and transfacet-pedicular trajectory, provides similar acute stability to the spinal segment compared with traditional bilateral pedicle screw fixation in the setting of lateral interbody cage deployment.",
keywords = "Facet screws, Lateral interbody fusion, Pedicle screws",
author = "Kretzer, {Ryan M.} and Camilo Molina and Nianbin Hu and Hidemasa Umekoji and Baaj, {Mhd-Ali -} and Hassan Serhan and Cunningham, {Bryan W.}",
year = "2016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "E336--E343",
journal = "Clinical Spine Surgery",
issn = "2380-0186",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative biomechanical analysis of stand alone versus facet screw and pedicle screw augmented lateral interbody arthrodesis

T2 - An in vitro human cadaveric model

AU - Kretzer, Ryan M.

AU - Molina, Camilo

AU - Hu, Nianbin

AU - Umekoji, Hidemasa

AU - Baaj, Mhd-Ali -

AU - Serhan, Hassan

AU - Cunningham, Bryan W.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Study Design: Cadaveric biomechanical study. Objective: To investigate the kinematic response of a standalone lateral lumbar interbody cage compared with supplemental posterior fixation with either facet or pedicle screws after lateral discectomy. Summary of Background Data: Lateral interbody fusion is a promising minimally invasive fixation technique for lumbar interbody arthrodesis. The biomechanical stability of stand-alone cage placement compared with supplemental posterior fixation with either facet or bilateral pedicle screws remains unclear. Methods: A 6-degree of freedom spine simulator was used to test flexibility in 7 human cadaveric specimens. Flexion-extension, lateral-bending, and axial-rotation were tested in the intact condition, followed by destabilization through a lateral discectomy at L2-L3 and L4-L5. Specimens were then reconstructed at both operative segments in the following sequence: (1) lateral interbody cage placement; (2) either Discovery facet screws or the Viper F2 system using a transfacetpedicular trajectory randomized to L2-L3 or L4-L5; and (3) removal of facet screw fixation followed by placement of bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation. Acute range of motion (ROM) was quantified and analyzed. Results: All 4 reconstruction groups, including stand-alone interbody cage placement, bilateral Discovery facet screws, the Viper F2 system, and bilateral pedicle screw-rod stabilization, resulted in a significant decrease in acute ROM in all loading modes tested (P<0.05). There were no significant differences observed between the 4 instrumentation groups (P>0.05). Although not statistically significant, the Viper F2 system resulted in greatest reduction of acute ROM in both flexion-extension and axial rotation versus all other treatments (P>0.05). Conclusions: Stand-alone interbody cage placement results in a significant reduction in acute ROM at the operative segment in the absence of posterior supplemental fixation. If added fixation is desired, facet screw placement, including the Viper F2 facet screw system using an integrated compression washer and transfacet-pedicular trajectory, provides similar acute stability to the spinal segment compared with traditional bilateral pedicle screw fixation in the setting of lateral interbody cage deployment.

AB - Study Design: Cadaveric biomechanical study. Objective: To investigate the kinematic response of a standalone lateral lumbar interbody cage compared with supplemental posterior fixation with either facet or pedicle screws after lateral discectomy. Summary of Background Data: Lateral interbody fusion is a promising minimally invasive fixation technique for lumbar interbody arthrodesis. The biomechanical stability of stand-alone cage placement compared with supplemental posterior fixation with either facet or bilateral pedicle screws remains unclear. Methods: A 6-degree of freedom spine simulator was used to test flexibility in 7 human cadaveric specimens. Flexion-extension, lateral-bending, and axial-rotation were tested in the intact condition, followed by destabilization through a lateral discectomy at L2-L3 and L4-L5. Specimens were then reconstructed at both operative segments in the following sequence: (1) lateral interbody cage placement; (2) either Discovery facet screws or the Viper F2 system using a transfacetpedicular trajectory randomized to L2-L3 or L4-L5; and (3) removal of facet screw fixation followed by placement of bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation. Acute range of motion (ROM) was quantified and analyzed. Results: All 4 reconstruction groups, including stand-alone interbody cage placement, bilateral Discovery facet screws, the Viper F2 system, and bilateral pedicle screw-rod stabilization, resulted in a significant decrease in acute ROM in all loading modes tested (P<0.05). There were no significant differences observed between the 4 instrumentation groups (P>0.05). Although not statistically significant, the Viper F2 system resulted in greatest reduction of acute ROM in both flexion-extension and axial rotation versus all other treatments (P>0.05). Conclusions: Stand-alone interbody cage placement results in a significant reduction in acute ROM at the operative segment in the absence of posterior supplemental fixation. If added fixation is desired, facet screw placement, including the Viper F2 facet screw system using an integrated compression washer and transfacet-pedicular trajectory, provides similar acute stability to the spinal segment compared with traditional bilateral pedicle screw fixation in the setting of lateral interbody cage deployment.

KW - Facet screws

KW - Lateral interbody fusion

KW - Pedicle screws

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007417860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007417860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 27137151

AN - SCOPUS:85007417860

VL - 29

SP - E336-E343

JO - Clinical Spine Surgery

JF - Clinical Spine Surgery

SN - 2380-0186

IS - 7

ER -