A comparison of adenosine A2A agonism and methylprednisolone in attenuating neuronal damage and improving functional outcome after experimental traumatic spinal cord injury in rabbits

David O. Okonkwo, T. Brett Reece, Jeffrey J. Laurent, A. Stewart Hawkins, Peter I. Ellman, Joel Linden, Irving L. Kron, Curtis G. Tribble, James R. Stone, John A. Kern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Object. Steroid agents remain the lone pharmacological treatment in widespread use for acute spinal cord injury (SCI), although their utility remains in dispute in the neurotrauma literature. Adenosine A2A receptor activation with ATL-146e, a selective A2A agonist, has shown potential benefit in treating SCI; however, it has not been compared with the gold standard, methylprednisolone. The authors of this study evaluated ATL-146e and methylprednisolone for their ability to preserve neuronal viability and motor function in experimental SCI. Methods. New Zealand White rabbits sustained SCI or sham injury via the Allen weight-drop technique. Ten minutes postinjury, animals received ATL-146e (ATL group, 0.06 μg/kg/min intravenously for 3 hours), methylprednisolone (steroid group, 30 mg/kg intravenously), or saline (trauma control group). Hindlimb motor function was recorded every 12 hours using the Tarlov motor grading scale (0, paralysis-5, normal hop). At 48 hours, fixed spinal cord tissue was evaluated for neuronal viability. Hindlimb motor function in animals treated with ATL-146e was equivalent to that of sham-injured animals and was significantly better than that of trauma control animals at all time points and that of steroid-treated animals at 12 hours (p = 0.05). Motor function in steroid-treated animals was worse than in those given ATL-146e and better than that of trauma control animals at later time points, but was not statistically significant (both p > 0.05). Neuronal viability (measured in neurons/hpf) was significantly higher in both treatment groups compared with the trauma control group (12.1 ± 1.4 neurons/hpf for the ATL and 13.3 ± 1.4 neurons/hpf for the steroid group compared with 7.5 ± 1.5 neurons/hpf for the trauma control group; both p < 0.04). Neuronal viability did not differ among ATL-146e-treated, steroid-treated, and sham-injured groups. Conclusions. The use of ATL-146e is at least as effective as methylprednisolone in preserving function and is equivalent to methylprednisolone in preserving the structure of spinal cord tissue after blunt SCI. Adenosine A2A receptor activation may be an effective treatment for acute SCI while avoiding the adverse effects of steroid agents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-70
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • A receptor
  • Adenosine
  • Methylprednisolone
  • Rabbit
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of adenosine A<sub>2A</sub> agonism and methylprednisolone in attenuating neuronal damage and improving functional outcome after experimental traumatic spinal cord injury in rabbits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this