A comparison of fetal growth curves at altitude and sea level

L. A. Izquierdo, W. H. Barstow, C. Qualls, G. J. Gibson, James E Maciulla, B. G. Nevils, L. B. Curet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To study intrauterine growth at an altitude of 5,200 feet in order to determine the most appropriate standard of birthweight charts to be used at this altitude. Methods: A total of 3,147 singleton deliveries were reviewed to determine (1) birth weight, (2) residence at an altitude of 5,200 feet, (3) dating of pregnancy. A total of 1,621 cases were included, and birthweights were compared with birthweights from California and Denver. We performed a one-sample t test at each week of gestational age. A P value of less than 0.003 was considered significant. Results: (1) there was a significant difference in birthweight between Albuquerque and Denver after 37 weeks; (2) there was no difference between birthweights in Albuquerque and California; (3) Hispanic babies were significantly smaller than Angle-American babies. Conclusion: Neonates born at 5,200 feet above sea level fit growth curves developed at sea level in California in 1981 and not those obtained in babies born at altitudes in Denver in 1963. These observations may be the result of the differences in nutritional intake by the pregnant women and improved prenatal care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-51
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal Investigation
Volume5
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fetal Development
Oceans and Seas
Prenatal Care
Growth
Hispanic Americans
Birth Weight
Gestational Age
Pregnant Women
Newborn Infant
Pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Izquierdo, L. A., Barstow, W. H., Qualls, C., Gibson, G. J., Maciulla, J. E., Nevils, B. G., & Curet, L. B. (1995). A comparison of fetal growth curves at altitude and sea level. Journal of Maternal-Fetal Investigation, 5(1), 48-51.

A comparison of fetal growth curves at altitude and sea level. / Izquierdo, L. A.; Barstow, W. H.; Qualls, C.; Gibson, G. J.; Maciulla, James E; Nevils, B. G.; Curet, L. B.

In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal Investigation, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1995, p. 48-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Izquierdo, LA, Barstow, WH, Qualls, C, Gibson, GJ, Maciulla, JE, Nevils, BG & Curet, LB 1995, 'A comparison of fetal growth curves at altitude and sea level', Journal of Maternal-Fetal Investigation, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 48-51.
Izquierdo LA, Barstow WH, Qualls C, Gibson GJ, Maciulla JE, Nevils BG et al. A comparison of fetal growth curves at altitude and sea level. Journal of Maternal-Fetal Investigation. 1995;5(1):48-51.
Izquierdo, L. A. ; Barstow, W. H. ; Qualls, C. ; Gibson, G. J. ; Maciulla, James E ; Nevils, B. G. ; Curet, L. B. / A comparison of fetal growth curves at altitude and sea level. In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal Investigation. 1995 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 48-51.
@article{a0ad3f710df4474997094d6ea3d42b0a,
title = "A comparison of fetal growth curves at altitude and sea level",
abstract = "Objective: To study intrauterine growth at an altitude of 5,200 feet in order to determine the most appropriate standard of birthweight charts to be used at this altitude. Methods: A total of 3,147 singleton deliveries were reviewed to determine (1) birth weight, (2) residence at an altitude of 5,200 feet, (3) dating of pregnancy. A total of 1,621 cases were included, and birthweights were compared with birthweights from California and Denver. We performed a one-sample t test at each week of gestational age. A P value of less than 0.003 was considered significant. Results: (1) there was a significant difference in birthweight between Albuquerque and Denver after 37 weeks; (2) there was no difference between birthweights in Albuquerque and California; (3) Hispanic babies were significantly smaller than Angle-American babies. Conclusion: Neonates born at 5,200 feet above sea level fit growth curves developed at sea level in California in 1981 and not those obtained in babies born at altitudes in Denver in 1963. These observations may be the result of the differences in nutritional intake by the pregnant women and improved prenatal care.",
author = "Izquierdo, {L. A.} and Barstow, {W. H.} and C. Qualls and Gibson, {G. J.} and Maciulla, {James E} and Nevils, {B. G.} and Curet, {L. B.}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "48--51",
journal = "Journal of Maternal-Fetal Investigation",
issn = "0939-6322",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of fetal growth curves at altitude and sea level

AU - Izquierdo, L. A.

AU - Barstow, W. H.

AU - Qualls, C.

AU - Gibson, G. J.

AU - Maciulla, James E

AU - Nevils, B. G.

AU - Curet, L. B.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Objective: To study intrauterine growth at an altitude of 5,200 feet in order to determine the most appropriate standard of birthweight charts to be used at this altitude. Methods: A total of 3,147 singleton deliveries were reviewed to determine (1) birth weight, (2) residence at an altitude of 5,200 feet, (3) dating of pregnancy. A total of 1,621 cases were included, and birthweights were compared with birthweights from California and Denver. We performed a one-sample t test at each week of gestational age. A P value of less than 0.003 was considered significant. Results: (1) there was a significant difference in birthweight between Albuquerque and Denver after 37 weeks; (2) there was no difference between birthweights in Albuquerque and California; (3) Hispanic babies were significantly smaller than Angle-American babies. Conclusion: Neonates born at 5,200 feet above sea level fit growth curves developed at sea level in California in 1981 and not those obtained in babies born at altitudes in Denver in 1963. These observations may be the result of the differences in nutritional intake by the pregnant women and improved prenatal care.

AB - Objective: To study intrauterine growth at an altitude of 5,200 feet in order to determine the most appropriate standard of birthweight charts to be used at this altitude. Methods: A total of 3,147 singleton deliveries were reviewed to determine (1) birth weight, (2) residence at an altitude of 5,200 feet, (3) dating of pregnancy. A total of 1,621 cases were included, and birthweights were compared with birthweights from California and Denver. We performed a one-sample t test at each week of gestational age. A P value of less than 0.003 was considered significant. Results: (1) there was a significant difference in birthweight between Albuquerque and Denver after 37 weeks; (2) there was no difference between birthweights in Albuquerque and California; (3) Hispanic babies were significantly smaller than Angle-American babies. Conclusion: Neonates born at 5,200 feet above sea level fit growth curves developed at sea level in California in 1981 and not those obtained in babies born at altitudes in Denver in 1963. These observations may be the result of the differences in nutritional intake by the pregnant women and improved prenatal care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028935713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028935713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 48

EP - 51

JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal Investigation

JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal Investigation

SN - 0939-6322

IS - 1

ER -