A Comparison of Methods for Capturing Patient Preferences for Delivery of Mental Health Services to Low-Income Hispanics Engaged in Primary Care

Patricia M. Herman, Maia Ingram, Charles E. Cunningham, Heather Rimas, Lucy Murrieta, Kenneth A Schachter, Jill G De Zapien, Scott C Carvajal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Consideration of patient preferences regarding delivery of mental health services within primary care may greatly improve access and quality of care for the many who could benefit from those services. Objectives: This project evaluated the feasibility and usefulness of adding a consumer-products design method to qualitative methods implemented within a community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework. Research Design: Discrete-choice conjoint experiment (DCE) added to systematic focus group data collection and analysis. Subjects: Focus group data were collected from 64 patients of a Federally-Qualified Health Center (FQHC) serving a predominantly low-income Hispanic population. A total of 604 patients in the waiting rooms of the FQHC responded to the DCE. Measures: The DCE contained 15 choice tasks that each asked respondents to choose between three mental health services options described by the levels of two (of eight) attributes based on themes that emerged from focus group data. Results: The addition of the DCE was found to be feasible and useful in providing distinct information on relative patient preferences compared with the focus group analyses alone. According to market simulations, the package of mental health services guided by the results of the DCE was preferred by patients. Conclusions: Unique patterns of patient preferences were uncovered by the DCE and these findings were useful in identifying pragmatic solutions to better address the mental health service needs of this population. However, for this resource-intensive method to be adopted more broadly, the scale of the primary care setting and/or scope of the issue addressed have to be relatively large.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-301
Number of pages9
JournalPatient
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Patient Preference
Mental Health Services
Focus Groups
Hispanic Americans
Primary Health Care
Community-Based Participatory Research
Quality of Health Care
Health Services Needs and Demand
Health
Poverty
Research Design
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing (miscellaneous)

Cite this

A Comparison of Methods for Capturing Patient Preferences for Delivery of Mental Health Services to Low-Income Hispanics Engaged in Primary Care. / Herman, Patricia M.; Ingram, Maia; Cunningham, Charles E.; Rimas, Heather; Murrieta, Lucy; Schachter, Kenneth A; De Zapien, Jill G; Carvajal, Scott C.

In: Patient, Vol. 9, No. 4, 01.08.2016, p. 293-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dc16805f86aa46a687e2aa72e46de3e4,
title = "A Comparison of Methods for Capturing Patient Preferences for Delivery of Mental Health Services to Low-Income Hispanics Engaged in Primary Care",
abstract = "Background: Consideration of patient preferences regarding delivery of mental health services within primary care may greatly improve access and quality of care for the many who could benefit from those services. Objectives: This project evaluated the feasibility and usefulness of adding a consumer-products design method to qualitative methods implemented within a community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework. Research Design: Discrete-choice conjoint experiment (DCE) added to systematic focus group data collection and analysis. Subjects: Focus group data were collected from 64 patients of a Federally-Qualified Health Center (FQHC) serving a predominantly low-income Hispanic population. A total of 604 patients in the waiting rooms of the FQHC responded to the DCE. Measures: The DCE contained 15 choice tasks that each asked respondents to choose between three mental health services options described by the levels of two (of eight) attributes based on themes that emerged from focus group data. Results: The addition of the DCE was found to be feasible and useful in providing distinct information on relative patient preferences compared with the focus group analyses alone. According to market simulations, the package of mental health services guided by the results of the DCE was preferred by patients. Conclusions: Unique patterns of patient preferences were uncovered by the DCE and these findings were useful in identifying pragmatic solutions to better address the mental health service needs of this population. However, for this resource-intensive method to be adopted more broadly, the scale of the primary care setting and/or scope of the issue addressed have to be relatively large.",
author = "Herman, {Patricia M.} and Maia Ingram and Cunningham, {Charles E.} and Heather Rimas and Lucy Murrieta and Schachter, {Kenneth A} and {De Zapien}, {Jill G} and Carvajal, {Scott C}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40271-015-0155-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "293--301",
journal = "Patient",
issn = "1178-1653",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Methods for Capturing Patient Preferences for Delivery of Mental Health Services to Low-Income Hispanics Engaged in Primary Care

AU - Herman, Patricia M.

AU - Ingram, Maia

AU - Cunningham, Charles E.

AU - Rimas, Heather

AU - Murrieta, Lucy

AU - Schachter, Kenneth A

AU - De Zapien, Jill G

AU - Carvajal, Scott C

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Background: Consideration of patient preferences regarding delivery of mental health services within primary care may greatly improve access and quality of care for the many who could benefit from those services. Objectives: This project evaluated the feasibility and usefulness of adding a consumer-products design method to qualitative methods implemented within a community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework. Research Design: Discrete-choice conjoint experiment (DCE) added to systematic focus group data collection and analysis. Subjects: Focus group data were collected from 64 patients of a Federally-Qualified Health Center (FQHC) serving a predominantly low-income Hispanic population. A total of 604 patients in the waiting rooms of the FQHC responded to the DCE. Measures: The DCE contained 15 choice tasks that each asked respondents to choose between three mental health services options described by the levels of two (of eight) attributes based on themes that emerged from focus group data. Results: The addition of the DCE was found to be feasible and useful in providing distinct information on relative patient preferences compared with the focus group analyses alone. According to market simulations, the package of mental health services guided by the results of the DCE was preferred by patients. Conclusions: Unique patterns of patient preferences were uncovered by the DCE and these findings were useful in identifying pragmatic solutions to better address the mental health service needs of this population. However, for this resource-intensive method to be adopted more broadly, the scale of the primary care setting and/or scope of the issue addressed have to be relatively large.

AB - Background: Consideration of patient preferences regarding delivery of mental health services within primary care may greatly improve access and quality of care for the many who could benefit from those services. Objectives: This project evaluated the feasibility and usefulness of adding a consumer-products design method to qualitative methods implemented within a community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework. Research Design: Discrete-choice conjoint experiment (DCE) added to systematic focus group data collection and analysis. Subjects: Focus group data were collected from 64 patients of a Federally-Qualified Health Center (FQHC) serving a predominantly low-income Hispanic population. A total of 604 patients in the waiting rooms of the FQHC responded to the DCE. Measures: The DCE contained 15 choice tasks that each asked respondents to choose between three mental health services options described by the levels of two (of eight) attributes based on themes that emerged from focus group data. Results: The addition of the DCE was found to be feasible and useful in providing distinct information on relative patient preferences compared with the focus group analyses alone. According to market simulations, the package of mental health services guided by the results of the DCE was preferred by patients. Conclusions: Unique patterns of patient preferences were uncovered by the DCE and these findings were useful in identifying pragmatic solutions to better address the mental health service needs of this population. However, for this resource-intensive method to be adopted more broadly, the scale of the primary care setting and/or scope of the issue addressed have to be relatively large.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977119826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977119826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40271-015-0155-7

DO - 10.1007/s40271-015-0155-7

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 293

EP - 301

JO - Patient

JF - Patient

SN - 1178-1653

IS - 4

ER -