A Comparison of Teacher Nomination and Screening to Identify Behavioral and Emotional Risk Within a Sample of Underrepresented Students

Erin Dowdy, Kymberly Doane, Katie R Eklund, Bridget V. Dever

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Early identification of behavioral and emotional risk has been identified as one strategy to help decrease rates of childhood behavioral and emotional problems. This study compares two methods for early identification (teacher nomination and universal screening) to determine how each strategy may differentially identify at-risk students. A sample of 849 elementary and middle school students was assessed on a number of behavioral and academic outcomes to determine differences among identification methods. Results indicate that universal screening identified a higher number of students than teacher nomination, and those identified by universal screening had lower reading grades. Both approaches identified more males than females. Although students identified as at risk by both methods had significantly more office discipline referrals, and lower study habits and cooperation grades than students not identified as at risk, there were no significant differences in these variables between the early identification methods. Implications and future research needs are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-137
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Students
teacher
student
student teacher
elementary school
habits
childhood
Habits
Reading
Referral and Consultation

Keywords

  • behavior rating scale
  • behavioral assessment
  • school
  • screening
  • teacher nomination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

A Comparison of Teacher Nomination and Screening to Identify Behavioral and Emotional Risk Within a Sample of Underrepresented Students. / Dowdy, Erin; Doane, Kymberly; Eklund, Katie R; Dever, Bridget V.

In: Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, Vol. 21, No. 2, 06.2013, p. 127-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b96146dcf6c4d56a96075c66c313b7b,
title = "A Comparison of Teacher Nomination and Screening to Identify Behavioral and Emotional Risk Within a Sample of Underrepresented Students",
abstract = "Early identification of behavioral and emotional risk has been identified as one strategy to help decrease rates of childhood behavioral and emotional problems. This study compares two methods for early identification (teacher nomination and universal screening) to determine how each strategy may differentially identify at-risk students. A sample of 849 elementary and middle school students was assessed on a number of behavioral and academic outcomes to determine differences among identification methods. Results indicate that universal screening identified a higher number of students than teacher nomination, and those identified by universal screening had lower reading grades. Both approaches identified more males than females. Although students identified as at risk by both methods had significantly more office discipline referrals, and lower study habits and cooperation grades than students not identified as at risk, there were no significant differences in these variables between the early identification methods. Implications and future research needs are discussed.",
keywords = "behavior rating scale, behavioral assessment, school, screening, teacher nomination",
author = "Erin Dowdy and Kymberly Doane and Eklund, {Katie R} and Dever, {Bridget V.}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/1063426611417627",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "127--137",
journal = "Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders",
issn = "1063-4266",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Teacher Nomination and Screening to Identify Behavioral and Emotional Risk Within a Sample of Underrepresented Students

AU - Dowdy, Erin

AU - Doane, Kymberly

AU - Eklund, Katie R

AU - Dever, Bridget V.

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Early identification of behavioral and emotional risk has been identified as one strategy to help decrease rates of childhood behavioral and emotional problems. This study compares two methods for early identification (teacher nomination and universal screening) to determine how each strategy may differentially identify at-risk students. A sample of 849 elementary and middle school students was assessed on a number of behavioral and academic outcomes to determine differences among identification methods. Results indicate that universal screening identified a higher number of students than teacher nomination, and those identified by universal screening had lower reading grades. Both approaches identified more males than females. Although students identified as at risk by both methods had significantly more office discipline referrals, and lower study habits and cooperation grades than students not identified as at risk, there were no significant differences in these variables between the early identification methods. Implications and future research needs are discussed.

AB - Early identification of behavioral and emotional risk has been identified as one strategy to help decrease rates of childhood behavioral and emotional problems. This study compares two methods for early identification (teacher nomination and universal screening) to determine how each strategy may differentially identify at-risk students. A sample of 849 elementary and middle school students was assessed on a number of behavioral and academic outcomes to determine differences among identification methods. Results indicate that universal screening identified a higher number of students than teacher nomination, and those identified by universal screening had lower reading grades. Both approaches identified more males than females. Although students identified as at risk by both methods had significantly more office discipline referrals, and lower study habits and cooperation grades than students not identified as at risk, there were no significant differences in these variables between the early identification methods. Implications and future research needs are discussed.

KW - behavior rating scale

KW - behavioral assessment

KW - school

KW - screening

KW - teacher nomination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877832668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877832668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1063426611417627

DO - 10.1177/1063426611417627

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877832668

VL - 21

SP - 127

EP - 137

JO - Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

JF - Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

SN - 1063-4266

IS - 2

ER -