A comparison of three infiltration models.

B. N. Wilson, Donald C Slack, R. A. Young

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three physically based infiltration models are compared both in terms of theoretical development and performance. The models are an unmodified Green-Ampt-Mein-Larson (GAML-UNMOD) model, a similar model which was modified to account for entrapped air (GAML-ETA model) and a model which considers both air entrapment and air resistance effects (GAML-ART model). -from Authors

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationTransactions, American Society of Agricultural Engineers
Pages349-356
Number of pages8
Volume25
Edition2
StatePublished - 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

infiltration
Air
air
comparison

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Wilson, B. N., Slack, D. C., & Young, R. A. (1982). A comparison of three infiltration models. In Transactions, American Society of Agricultural Engineers (2 ed., Vol. 25, pp. 349-356)

A comparison of three infiltration models. / Wilson, B. N.; Slack, Donald C; Young, R. A.

Transactions, American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Vol. 25 2. ed. 1982. p. 349-356.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Wilson, BN, Slack, DC & Young, RA 1982, A comparison of three infiltration models. in Transactions, American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 2 edn, vol. 25, pp. 349-356.
Wilson BN, Slack DC, Young RA. A comparison of three infiltration models. In Transactions, American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 2 ed. Vol. 25. 1982. p. 349-356
Wilson, B. N. ; Slack, Donald C ; Young, R. A. / A comparison of three infiltration models. Transactions, American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Vol. 25 2. ed. 1982. pp. 349-356
@inbook{2a079a3b358b497e99ee103995c7478f,
title = "A comparison of three infiltration models.",
abstract = "Three physically based infiltration models are compared both in terms of theoretical development and performance. The models are an unmodified Green-Ampt-Mein-Larson (GAML-UNMOD) model, a similar model which was modified to account for entrapped air (GAML-ETA model) and a model which considers both air entrapment and air resistance effects (GAML-ART model). -from Authors",
author = "Wilson, {B. N.} and Slack, {Donald C} and Young, {R. A.}",
year = "1982",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "349--356",
booktitle = "Transactions, American Society of Agricultural Engineers",
edition = "2",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - A comparison of three infiltration models.

AU - Wilson, B. N.

AU - Slack, Donald C

AU - Young, R. A.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - Three physically based infiltration models are compared both in terms of theoretical development and performance. The models are an unmodified Green-Ampt-Mein-Larson (GAML-UNMOD) model, a similar model which was modified to account for entrapped air (GAML-ETA model) and a model which considers both air entrapment and air resistance effects (GAML-ART model). -from Authors

AB - Three physically based infiltration models are compared both in terms of theoretical development and performance. The models are an unmodified Green-Ampt-Mein-Larson (GAML-UNMOD) model, a similar model which was modified to account for entrapped air (GAML-ETA model) and a model which considers both air entrapment and air resistance effects (GAML-ART model). -from Authors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020332307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020332307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

VL - 25

SP - 349

EP - 356

BT - Transactions, American Society of Agricultural Engineers

ER -