A contingency theory of policy innovation

How different theories explain the ratification of the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol

Yoshiki Yamagata, Jue Yang, Joseph J Galaskiewicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article tests theories, elaborated by rationalists, constructivists, and network theorists, that explain the ratification of international environmental treaties. Rationalists argue that countries' material self-interest and political and economic conditions affect the likelihood of countries ratifying treaties. Constructivists argue that countries are influenced by exposure to world society. Structural embeddedness theory argues that countries are influenced by neighboring countries, religion, language, and economic peers, and those whom they have network ties to via diplomatic relations and IGO memberships. The article is a study of how these factors affected the ratification of two environmental treaties: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol. The results show that political and economic factors, peer behavior, and network ties were more important in explaining the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol than the UNFCCC. Similar to von Stein (J Conflict Resolut 52:243-268, 2008), it found that exposure to world society was important in the UNFCCC. The authors suggested that the differences were due to the demands which the Kyoto Protocol placed on countries in contrast to the "softness" of the UNFCCC. They also discussed how social influence-based on a variety of inter-governmental relations and affiliations-may signal a change in the structure of the global environmental regime and how it conducts its business.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-270
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

contingency theory
ratification
Kyoto Protocol
innovation policy
treaty
world society
diplomatic relations
test theory
neighboring countries
political factors
economic factors
economics
UNO
climate change
Religion
language
Contingency theory
Policy innovation
Ratification
Treaties

Keywords

  • International organization
  • Kyoto Protocol
  • Social networks
  • UNFCCC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Law
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{28a3e2b7dea74e2eb58a9c8f44ca72c9,
title = "A contingency theory of policy innovation: How different theories explain the ratification of the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol",
abstract = "This article tests theories, elaborated by rationalists, constructivists, and network theorists, that explain the ratification of international environmental treaties. Rationalists argue that countries' material self-interest and political and economic conditions affect the likelihood of countries ratifying treaties. Constructivists argue that countries are influenced by exposure to world society. Structural embeddedness theory argues that countries are influenced by neighboring countries, religion, language, and economic peers, and those whom they have network ties to via diplomatic relations and IGO memberships. The article is a study of how these factors affected the ratification of two environmental treaties: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol. The results show that political and economic factors, peer behavior, and network ties were more important in explaining the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol than the UNFCCC. Similar to von Stein (J Conflict Resolut 52:243-268, 2008), it found that exposure to world society was important in the UNFCCC. The authors suggested that the differences were due to the demands which the Kyoto Protocol placed on countries in contrast to the {"}softness{"} of the UNFCCC. They also discussed how social influence-based on a variety of inter-governmental relations and affiliations-may signal a change in the structure of the global environmental regime and how it conducts its business.",
keywords = "International organization, Kyoto Protocol, Social networks, UNFCCC",
author = "Yoshiki Yamagata and Jue Yang and Galaskiewicz, {Joseph J}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s10784-012-9185-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "251--270",
journal = "International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics",
issn = "1567-9764",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A contingency theory of policy innovation

T2 - How different theories explain the ratification of the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol

AU - Yamagata, Yoshiki

AU - Yang, Jue

AU - Galaskiewicz, Joseph J

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - This article tests theories, elaborated by rationalists, constructivists, and network theorists, that explain the ratification of international environmental treaties. Rationalists argue that countries' material self-interest and political and economic conditions affect the likelihood of countries ratifying treaties. Constructivists argue that countries are influenced by exposure to world society. Structural embeddedness theory argues that countries are influenced by neighboring countries, religion, language, and economic peers, and those whom they have network ties to via diplomatic relations and IGO memberships. The article is a study of how these factors affected the ratification of two environmental treaties: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol. The results show that political and economic factors, peer behavior, and network ties were more important in explaining the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol than the UNFCCC. Similar to von Stein (J Conflict Resolut 52:243-268, 2008), it found that exposure to world society was important in the UNFCCC. The authors suggested that the differences were due to the demands which the Kyoto Protocol placed on countries in contrast to the "softness" of the UNFCCC. They also discussed how social influence-based on a variety of inter-governmental relations and affiliations-may signal a change in the structure of the global environmental regime and how it conducts its business.

AB - This article tests theories, elaborated by rationalists, constructivists, and network theorists, that explain the ratification of international environmental treaties. Rationalists argue that countries' material self-interest and political and economic conditions affect the likelihood of countries ratifying treaties. Constructivists argue that countries are influenced by exposure to world society. Structural embeddedness theory argues that countries are influenced by neighboring countries, religion, language, and economic peers, and those whom they have network ties to via diplomatic relations and IGO memberships. The article is a study of how these factors affected the ratification of two environmental treaties: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol. The results show that political and economic factors, peer behavior, and network ties were more important in explaining the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol than the UNFCCC. Similar to von Stein (J Conflict Resolut 52:243-268, 2008), it found that exposure to world society was important in the UNFCCC. The authors suggested that the differences were due to the demands which the Kyoto Protocol placed on countries in contrast to the "softness" of the UNFCCC. They also discussed how social influence-based on a variety of inter-governmental relations and affiliations-may signal a change in the structure of the global environmental regime and how it conducts its business.

KW - International organization

KW - Kyoto Protocol

KW - Social networks

KW - UNFCCC

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882811757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882811757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10784-012-9185-y

DO - 10.1007/s10784-012-9185-y

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 251

EP - 270

JO - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

JF - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

SN - 1567-9764

IS - 3

ER -