A difference we can call our own

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article contends that communication scholars' most influential work is often not identifiably "communication" research. This phenomenon is a result of: (a) theory, which emphasizes message effects rather than message content, and (b) method, which has failed to provide valid, detailed, and shared methods for the quantitative examination of message content. It is suggested that a stronger focus on message content is required if communication is to maintain a disciplinary identity and a unique disciplinary contribution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-298
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Applied Communication Research
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Communication
communication
communication research
examination
Communication Research

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Message Content
  • Message Effects
  • Method
  • Theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

A difference we can call our own. / Harwood, James T.

In: Journal of Applied Communication Research, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2010, p. 295-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a341e06228e04e3cad0c7cf659dd55c0,
title = "A difference we can call our own",
abstract = "The article contends that communication scholars' most influential work is often not identifiably {"}communication{"} research. This phenomenon is a result of: (a) theory, which emphasizes message effects rather than message content, and (b) method, which has failed to provide valid, detailed, and shared methods for the quantitative examination of message content. It is suggested that a stronger focus on message content is required if communication is to maintain a disciplinary identity and a unique disciplinary contribution.",
keywords = "Communication, Message Content, Message Effects, Method, Theory",
author = "Harwood, {James T}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/00909882.2010.490843",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "295--298",
journal = "Journal of Applied Communication Research",
issn = "0090-9882",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A difference we can call our own

AU - Harwood, James T

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The article contends that communication scholars' most influential work is often not identifiably "communication" research. This phenomenon is a result of: (a) theory, which emphasizes message effects rather than message content, and (b) method, which has failed to provide valid, detailed, and shared methods for the quantitative examination of message content. It is suggested that a stronger focus on message content is required if communication is to maintain a disciplinary identity and a unique disciplinary contribution.

AB - The article contends that communication scholars' most influential work is often not identifiably "communication" research. This phenomenon is a result of: (a) theory, which emphasizes message effects rather than message content, and (b) method, which has failed to provide valid, detailed, and shared methods for the quantitative examination of message content. It is suggested that a stronger focus on message content is required if communication is to maintain a disciplinary identity and a unique disciplinary contribution.

KW - Communication

KW - Message Content

KW - Message Effects

KW - Method

KW - Theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954687051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954687051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00909882.2010.490843

DO - 10.1080/00909882.2010.490843

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77954687051

VL - 38

SP - 295

EP - 298

JO - Journal of Applied Communication Research

JF - Journal of Applied Communication Research

SN - 0090-9882

IS - 3

ER -