A Formal approach to the design and assembly of mobile toolkits

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

244 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is widely believed that the design of transported artifacts and toolkits employed by mobile populations is influenced by two main factors, portability and potential utility. Choices about the kinds of artifacts to carry around can be modeled as an optimization problem, in which it is beneficial to obtain the greatest potential utility for the minimum total weight. This study approaches the problem analytically, making a few simple assumptions about artifact geometry and the relations between utility and artifact size. If artifact utility is calculated as a function of potential for renewal, transported toolkits should consist entirely of relatively small finished tools. Moreover, most gains in durability or multifunctionality that require increases in overall size are outweighed by increased transport cost. Inconsistencies between these expectations and ethnographic and archaeological observations point to situations in which artifact functionality is more closely constrained by overall size or mass.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)426-442
Number of pages17
JournalAmerican Antiquity
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 1994

Fingerprint

artifact
functionality
Toolkit
Artifact
mathematics
costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Archaeology
  • Museology

Cite this

A Formal approach to the design and assembly of mobile toolkits. / Kuhn, Steven L.

In: American Antiquity, Vol. 59, No. 3, 01.07.1994, p. 426-442.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{e9aaed94901c4d42a9a388ae1e3bac6c,
title = "A Formal approach to the design and assembly of mobile toolkits",
abstract = "It is widely believed that the design of transported artifacts and toolkits employed by mobile populations is influenced by two main factors, portability and potential utility. Choices about the kinds of artifacts to carry around can be modeled as an optimization problem, in which it is beneficial to obtain the greatest potential utility for the minimum total weight. This study approaches the problem analytically, making a few simple assumptions about artifact geometry and the relations between utility and artifact size. If artifact utility is calculated as a function of potential for renewal, transported toolkits should consist entirely of relatively small finished tools. Moreover, most gains in durability or multifunctionality that require increases in overall size are outweighed by increased transport cost. Inconsistencies between these expectations and ethnographic and archaeological observations point to situations in which artifact functionality is more closely constrained by overall size or mass.",
author = "Kuhn, {Steven L}",
year = "1994",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/282456",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "426--442",
journal = "American Antiquity",
issn = "0002-7316",
publisher = "Society for American Archaeology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Formal approach to the design and assembly of mobile toolkits

AU - Kuhn, Steven L

PY - 1994/7/1

Y1 - 1994/7/1

N2 - It is widely believed that the design of transported artifacts and toolkits employed by mobile populations is influenced by two main factors, portability and potential utility. Choices about the kinds of artifacts to carry around can be modeled as an optimization problem, in which it is beneficial to obtain the greatest potential utility for the minimum total weight. This study approaches the problem analytically, making a few simple assumptions about artifact geometry and the relations between utility and artifact size. If artifact utility is calculated as a function of potential for renewal, transported toolkits should consist entirely of relatively small finished tools. Moreover, most gains in durability or multifunctionality that require increases in overall size are outweighed by increased transport cost. Inconsistencies between these expectations and ethnographic and archaeological observations point to situations in which artifact functionality is more closely constrained by overall size or mass.

AB - It is widely believed that the design of transported artifacts and toolkits employed by mobile populations is influenced by two main factors, portability and potential utility. Choices about the kinds of artifacts to carry around can be modeled as an optimization problem, in which it is beneficial to obtain the greatest potential utility for the minimum total weight. This study approaches the problem analytically, making a few simple assumptions about artifact geometry and the relations between utility and artifact size. If artifact utility is calculated as a function of potential for renewal, transported toolkits should consist entirely of relatively small finished tools. Moreover, most gains in durability or multifunctionality that require increases in overall size are outweighed by increased transport cost. Inconsistencies between these expectations and ethnographic and archaeological observations point to situations in which artifact functionality is more closely constrained by overall size or mass.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49249139812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49249139812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/282456

DO - 10.2307/282456

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:49249139812

VL - 59

SP - 426

EP - 442

JO - American Antiquity

JF - American Antiquity

SN - 0002-7316

IS - 3

ER -