A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems

Kristin L Gunckel, Beth A. Covitt, Ivan Salinas, Charles W. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Providing model-based accounts (explanations and predictions) of water and substances in water moving through environmental systems is an important practice for environmental science literacy and necessary for citizens confronting global and local water quantity and quality issues. In this article we present a learning progression for water in environmental systems for students in elementary through high school grades. We investigated student accounts of water and substances in water moving through atmospheric, surface, and soil/groundwater systems, including human-engineered components of these systems. Using an iterative process of model design, assessment, and interpretation, we identified four levels of achievement in student reasoning. Levels 1 and 2 force-dynamic accounts explain movement of water as interactions between natural tendencies of water and countervailing powers. Level 3 incomplete school science accounts put events in order and trace water and substance along multiple pathways that include hidden and invisible components. Only Level 4 qualitative model-based accounts include driving forces and constraining factors to explain or predict where water and substances in water move in given situations. The majority of high school students on average provide accounts between levels 2 and 3. We discuss the significance of these results for citizen participation in addressing common water issues. We end with suggestions for how the water learning progression can be used to inform changes to curricula, assessment, and instruction to support students in achieving level 4 performance. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 49: 843-868, 2012

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)843-868
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Research in Science Teaching
Volume49
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

ecological system
water
learning
student
citizens' participation
science
school
school grade

Keywords

  • environmental science literacy
  • learning progressions
  • water systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems. / Gunckel, Kristin L; Covitt, Beth A.; Salinas, Ivan; Anderson, Charles W.

In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 49, No. 7, 09.2012, p. 843-868.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gunckel, Kristin L ; Covitt, Beth A. ; Salinas, Ivan ; Anderson, Charles W. / A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2012 ; Vol. 49, No. 7. pp. 843-868.
@article{1f681cdcb94049c59049504706015b8d,
title = "A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems",
abstract = "Providing model-based accounts (explanations and predictions) of water and substances in water moving through environmental systems is an important practice for environmental science literacy and necessary for citizens confronting global and local water quantity and quality issues. In this article we present a learning progression for water in environmental systems for students in elementary through high school grades. We investigated student accounts of water and substances in water moving through atmospheric, surface, and soil/groundwater systems, including human-engineered components of these systems. Using an iterative process of model design, assessment, and interpretation, we identified four levels of achievement in student reasoning. Levels 1 and 2 force-dynamic accounts explain movement of water as interactions between natural tendencies of water and countervailing powers. Level 3 incomplete school science accounts put events in order and trace water and substance along multiple pathways that include hidden and invisible components. Only Level 4 qualitative model-based accounts include driving forces and constraining factors to explain or predict where water and substances in water move in given situations. The majority of high school students on average provide accounts between levels 2 and 3. We discuss the significance of these results for citizen participation in addressing common water issues. We end with suggestions for how the water learning progression can be used to inform changes to curricula, assessment, and instruction to support students in achieving level 4 performance. {\circledC} 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 49: 843-868, 2012",
keywords = "environmental science literacy, learning progressions, water systems",
author = "Gunckel, {Kristin L} and Covitt, {Beth A.} and Ivan Salinas and Anderson, {Charles W.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1002/tea.21024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "843--868",
journal = "Journal of Research in Science Teaching",
issn = "0022-4308",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems

AU - Gunckel, Kristin L

AU - Covitt, Beth A.

AU - Salinas, Ivan

AU - Anderson, Charles W.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Providing model-based accounts (explanations and predictions) of water and substances in water moving through environmental systems is an important practice for environmental science literacy and necessary for citizens confronting global and local water quantity and quality issues. In this article we present a learning progression for water in environmental systems for students in elementary through high school grades. We investigated student accounts of water and substances in water moving through atmospheric, surface, and soil/groundwater systems, including human-engineered components of these systems. Using an iterative process of model design, assessment, and interpretation, we identified four levels of achievement in student reasoning. Levels 1 and 2 force-dynamic accounts explain movement of water as interactions between natural tendencies of water and countervailing powers. Level 3 incomplete school science accounts put events in order and trace water and substance along multiple pathways that include hidden and invisible components. Only Level 4 qualitative model-based accounts include driving forces and constraining factors to explain or predict where water and substances in water move in given situations. The majority of high school students on average provide accounts between levels 2 and 3. We discuss the significance of these results for citizen participation in addressing common water issues. We end with suggestions for how the water learning progression can be used to inform changes to curricula, assessment, and instruction to support students in achieving level 4 performance. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 49: 843-868, 2012

AB - Providing model-based accounts (explanations and predictions) of water and substances in water moving through environmental systems is an important practice for environmental science literacy and necessary for citizens confronting global and local water quantity and quality issues. In this article we present a learning progression for water in environmental systems for students in elementary through high school grades. We investigated student accounts of water and substances in water moving through atmospheric, surface, and soil/groundwater systems, including human-engineered components of these systems. Using an iterative process of model design, assessment, and interpretation, we identified four levels of achievement in student reasoning. Levels 1 and 2 force-dynamic accounts explain movement of water as interactions between natural tendencies of water and countervailing powers. Level 3 incomplete school science accounts put events in order and trace water and substance along multiple pathways that include hidden and invisible components. Only Level 4 qualitative model-based accounts include driving forces and constraining factors to explain or predict where water and substances in water move in given situations. The majority of high school students on average provide accounts between levels 2 and 3. We discuss the significance of these results for citizen participation in addressing common water issues. We end with suggestions for how the water learning progression can be used to inform changes to curricula, assessment, and instruction to support students in achieving level 4 performance. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 49: 843-868, 2012

KW - environmental science literacy

KW - learning progressions

KW - water systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865228441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865228441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/tea.21024

DO - 10.1002/tea.21024

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84865228441

VL - 49

SP - 843

EP - 868

JO - Journal of Research in Science Teaching

JF - Journal of Research in Science Teaching

SN - 0022-4308

IS - 7

ER -