A lottery improves performance on a low-stakes test for males but not females

James S. Cole, David A. Bergin, Jessica Summers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to address the effectiveness of autonomy support and a lottery-based reward in enhancing test performance and test-taking motivation on a low-stakes test. Two hundred and forty-six university students were randomly assigned to three groups–lottery, autonomy support and control–and took a mathematics test. Students in the autonomy support and lottery group reported putting forth more test-taking effort than students in the control group. Males who were offered a chance at winning the financial reward scored almost 10 points higher on the exam compared to females. Results showed no significant difference in test scores for female students among groups, suggesting that neither intervention had an impact on females.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)488-503
Number of pages16
JournalAssessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 3 2018

Keywords

  • Test-taking
  • motivation
  • self-determination theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A lottery improves performance on a low-stakes test for males but not females'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this