A lottery improves performance on a low-stakes test for males but not females

James S. Cole, David A. Bergin, Jessica J Summers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to address the effectiveness of autonomy support and a lottery-based reward in enhancing test performance and test-taking motivation on a low-stakes test. Two hundred and forty-six university students were randomly assigned to three groups – lottery, autonomy support and control – and took a mathematics test. Students in the autonomy support and lottery group reported putting forth more test-taking effort than students in the control group. Males who were offered a chance at winning the financial reward scored almost 10 points higher on the exam compared to females. Results showed no significant difference in test scores for female students among groups, suggesting that neither intervention had an impact on females.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalAssessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Aug 26 2016

Fingerprint

performance
autonomy
reward
Group
student
female student
mathematics
university

Keywords

  • motivation
  • self-determination theory
  • Test-taking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

A lottery improves performance on a low-stakes test for males but not females. / Cole, James S.; Bergin, David A.; Summers, Jessica J.

In: Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 26.08.2016, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3e411bc833eb472694a8fdf66315783e,
title = "A lottery improves performance on a low-stakes test for males but not females",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to address the effectiveness of autonomy support and a lottery-based reward in enhancing test performance and test-taking motivation on a low-stakes test. Two hundred and forty-six university students were randomly assigned to three groups – lottery, autonomy support and control – and took a mathematics test. Students in the autonomy support and lottery group reported putting forth more test-taking effort than students in the control group. Males who were offered a chance at winning the financial reward scored almost 10 points higher on the exam compared to females. Results showed no significant difference in test scores for female students among groups, suggesting that neither intervention had an impact on females.",
keywords = "motivation, self-determination theory, Test-taking",
author = "Cole, {James S.} and Bergin, {David A.} and Summers, {Jessica J}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1080/0969594X.2016.1224812",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice",
issn = "0969-594X",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A lottery improves performance on a low-stakes test for males but not females

AU - Cole, James S.

AU - Bergin, David A.

AU - Summers, Jessica J

PY - 2016/8/26

Y1 - 2016/8/26

N2 - The purpose of this study was to address the effectiveness of autonomy support and a lottery-based reward in enhancing test performance and test-taking motivation on a low-stakes test. Two hundred and forty-six university students were randomly assigned to three groups – lottery, autonomy support and control – and took a mathematics test. Students in the autonomy support and lottery group reported putting forth more test-taking effort than students in the control group. Males who were offered a chance at winning the financial reward scored almost 10 points higher on the exam compared to females. Results showed no significant difference in test scores for female students among groups, suggesting that neither intervention had an impact on females.

AB - The purpose of this study was to address the effectiveness of autonomy support and a lottery-based reward in enhancing test performance and test-taking motivation on a low-stakes test. Two hundred and forty-six university students were randomly assigned to three groups – lottery, autonomy support and control – and took a mathematics test. Students in the autonomy support and lottery group reported putting forth more test-taking effort than students in the control group. Males who were offered a chance at winning the financial reward scored almost 10 points higher on the exam compared to females. Results showed no significant difference in test scores for female students among groups, suggesting that neither intervention had an impact on females.

KW - motivation

KW - self-determination theory

KW - Test-taking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983542707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983542707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0969594X.2016.1224812

DO - 10.1080/0969594X.2016.1224812

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84983542707

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

JF - Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

SN - 0969-594X

ER -