A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews

Wendy L. Richman, Suzanne P Weisband, Sara Kiesler, Fritz Drasgow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

424 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A meta-analysis of social desirability distortion compared computer questionnaires with traditional paper-and-pencil questionnaires and face-to-face interviews in 61 studies (1967-1997; 673 effect sizes). Controlling for correlated observations, a near-zero overall effect size was obtained for computer versus paper-and-pencil questionnaires. With moderators, there was less distortion on computerized measures of social desirability responding than on the paper-and-pencil measures, especially when respondents were alone and could backtrack. There was more distortion on the computer on other scales, but distortion was small when respondents were alone, anonymous, and could backtrack. There was less distortion on computerized versions of interviews than on face-to-face interviews. Research is needed on nonlinear patterns of distortion, and on the effects of context and interface on privacy perceptions and on responses to sensitive questions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)754-775
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume84
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Desirability
Interviews
Privacy
Meta-Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. / Richman, Wendy L.; Weisband, Suzanne P; Kiesler, Sara; Drasgow, Fritz.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 84, No. 5, 10.1999, p. 754-775.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{82e3bde75c334c5f921f52c616a027ee,
title = "A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews",
abstract = "A meta-analysis of social desirability distortion compared computer questionnaires with traditional paper-and-pencil questionnaires and face-to-face interviews in 61 studies (1967-1997; 673 effect sizes). Controlling for correlated observations, a near-zero overall effect size was obtained for computer versus paper-and-pencil questionnaires. With moderators, there was less distortion on computerized measures of social desirability responding than on the paper-and-pencil measures, especially when respondents were alone and could backtrack. There was more distortion on the computer on other scales, but distortion was small when respondents were alone, anonymous, and could backtrack. There was less distortion on computerized versions of interviews than on face-to-face interviews. Research is needed on nonlinear patterns of distortion, and on the effects of context and interface on privacy perceptions and on responses to sensitive questions.",
author = "Richman, {Wendy L.} and Weisband, {Suzanne P} and Sara Kiesler and Fritz Drasgow",
year = "1999",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.754",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "754--775",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews

AU - Richman, Wendy L.

AU - Weisband, Suzanne P

AU - Kiesler, Sara

AU - Drasgow, Fritz

PY - 1999/10

Y1 - 1999/10

N2 - A meta-analysis of social desirability distortion compared computer questionnaires with traditional paper-and-pencil questionnaires and face-to-face interviews in 61 studies (1967-1997; 673 effect sizes). Controlling for correlated observations, a near-zero overall effect size was obtained for computer versus paper-and-pencil questionnaires. With moderators, there was less distortion on computerized measures of social desirability responding than on the paper-and-pencil measures, especially when respondents were alone and could backtrack. There was more distortion on the computer on other scales, but distortion was small when respondents were alone, anonymous, and could backtrack. There was less distortion on computerized versions of interviews than on face-to-face interviews. Research is needed on nonlinear patterns of distortion, and on the effects of context and interface on privacy perceptions and on responses to sensitive questions.

AB - A meta-analysis of social desirability distortion compared computer questionnaires with traditional paper-and-pencil questionnaires and face-to-face interviews in 61 studies (1967-1997; 673 effect sizes). Controlling for correlated observations, a near-zero overall effect size was obtained for computer versus paper-and-pencil questionnaires. With moderators, there was less distortion on computerized measures of social desirability responding than on the paper-and-pencil measures, especially when respondents were alone and could backtrack. There was more distortion on the computer on other scales, but distortion was small when respondents were alone, anonymous, and could backtrack. There was less distortion on computerized versions of interviews than on face-to-face interviews. Research is needed on nonlinear patterns of distortion, and on the effects of context and interface on privacy perceptions and on responses to sensitive questions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033211868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033211868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.754

DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.754

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 754

EP - 775

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 5

ER -