A method for calculating adherence to polypharmacy from dispensing data records

Isabelle Arnet, Ivo L Abraham, Markus Messerli, Kurt E. Hersberger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Several measures for calculating adherence to one medication from dispensing data records have been proposed, but the nomenclature is inconsistent and computations vary. The same measures, like the medication possession ratio (MPR), have been used for multiple medication regimens, and have tended to over- or under-estimate adherence rates. Objective: To demonstrate the impact of varying elements in MPR to a single medication regimen; to define standards for the estimation of adherence to polypharmacy; to propose a new method for calculating adherence to polypharmacy; to face validate it. Setting: Face validity of the proposed method. Method: Variations in the MPR formula were simulated. Standards for the estimation of adherence to polypharmacy were defined. A new method to calculate adherence to polypharmacy was established. Its face validity with three illustrative cases obtained from a pharmacy refill database was assessed. Main outcome measure: Adherence rate to polypharmacy from refill data records. Results: MPR to a single medication is operationalized in the numerator and denominator and is influenced by the parameters like observation period, medication gaps, overlap. For polypharmacy, an average MPR is commonly used, which is not accounting for the specificity of multiple medications, and hence overestimating adherence rate. We propose the daily polypharmacy possession ratio (DPPR) as an index of adherence to polypharmacy. It estimates the proportion of time a patient had medication available for use by considering the presence or absence of multiple medications on each day in the observation period. We calculated possession rates from refill histories over 31 months (January 1, 2011-July 31, 2013) for three illustrative patients. The average MPR estimates were 80% for a patient with 6 medications/20 refill dates, 90% for a patient with 4 medications/11 refill dates, and 89% for a patient with 3 medications/17 refill dates. The corresponding DPPRs were 75, 88 and 99%, indicating overestimations by 5 and 2%, and underestimation by 10%, respectively. Conclusion: The DPPR accounts for the specificity of polypharmacy including number of medications, medication switching, duplication, overlapping. Research is needed to further confirm the validity of this new index.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)192-201
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Polypharmacy
Terminology
Reproducibility of Results
Observation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Compliance
  • Daily polypharmacy possession ratio
  • Medication possession ratio
  • Pharmacy claims
  • Polypharmacy
  • Refill data

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Pharmaceutical Science
  • Pharmacology
  • Toxicology
  • Pharmacy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A method for calculating adherence to polypharmacy from dispensing data records. / Arnet, Isabelle; Abraham, Ivo L; Messerli, Markus; Hersberger, Kurt E.

In: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2014, p. 192-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arnet, Isabelle ; Abraham, Ivo L ; Messerli, Markus ; Hersberger, Kurt E. / A method for calculating adherence to polypharmacy from dispensing data records. In: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 2014 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 192-201.
@article{eeec32a93e7b41ab87099b12827a8947,
title = "A method for calculating adherence to polypharmacy from dispensing data records",
abstract = "Background: Several measures for calculating adherence to one medication from dispensing data records have been proposed, but the nomenclature is inconsistent and computations vary. The same measures, like the medication possession ratio (MPR), have been used for multiple medication regimens, and have tended to over- or under-estimate adherence rates. Objective: To demonstrate the impact of varying elements in MPR to a single medication regimen; to define standards for the estimation of adherence to polypharmacy; to propose a new method for calculating adherence to polypharmacy; to face validate it. Setting: Face validity of the proposed method. Method: Variations in the MPR formula were simulated. Standards for the estimation of adherence to polypharmacy were defined. A new method to calculate adherence to polypharmacy was established. Its face validity with three illustrative cases obtained from a pharmacy refill database was assessed. Main outcome measure: Adherence rate to polypharmacy from refill data records. Results: MPR to a single medication is operationalized in the numerator and denominator and is influenced by the parameters like observation period, medication gaps, overlap. For polypharmacy, an average MPR is commonly used, which is not accounting for the specificity of multiple medications, and hence overestimating adherence rate. We propose the daily polypharmacy possession ratio (DPPR) as an index of adherence to polypharmacy. It estimates the proportion of time a patient had medication available for use by considering the presence or absence of multiple medications on each day in the observation period. We calculated possession rates from refill histories over 31 months (January 1, 2011-July 31, 2013) for three illustrative patients. The average MPR estimates were 80{\%} for a patient with 6 medications/20 refill dates, 90{\%} for a patient with 4 medications/11 refill dates, and 89{\%} for a patient with 3 medications/17 refill dates. The corresponding DPPRs were 75, 88 and 99{\%}, indicating overestimations by 5 and 2{\%}, and underestimation by 10{\%}, respectively. Conclusion: The DPPR accounts for the specificity of polypharmacy including number of medications, medication switching, duplication, overlapping. Research is needed to further confirm the validity of this new index.",
keywords = "Adherence, Compliance, Daily polypharmacy possession ratio, Medication possession ratio, Pharmacy claims, Polypharmacy, Refill data",
author = "Isabelle Arnet and Abraham, {Ivo L} and Markus Messerli and Hersberger, {Kurt E.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s11096-013-9891-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "192--201",
journal = "International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy",
issn = "2210-7703",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A method for calculating adherence to polypharmacy from dispensing data records

AU - Arnet, Isabelle

AU - Abraham, Ivo L

AU - Messerli, Markus

AU - Hersberger, Kurt E.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Several measures for calculating adherence to one medication from dispensing data records have been proposed, but the nomenclature is inconsistent and computations vary. The same measures, like the medication possession ratio (MPR), have been used for multiple medication regimens, and have tended to over- or under-estimate adherence rates. Objective: To demonstrate the impact of varying elements in MPR to a single medication regimen; to define standards for the estimation of adherence to polypharmacy; to propose a new method for calculating adherence to polypharmacy; to face validate it. Setting: Face validity of the proposed method. Method: Variations in the MPR formula were simulated. Standards for the estimation of adherence to polypharmacy were defined. A new method to calculate adherence to polypharmacy was established. Its face validity with three illustrative cases obtained from a pharmacy refill database was assessed. Main outcome measure: Adherence rate to polypharmacy from refill data records. Results: MPR to a single medication is operationalized in the numerator and denominator and is influenced by the parameters like observation period, medication gaps, overlap. For polypharmacy, an average MPR is commonly used, which is not accounting for the specificity of multiple medications, and hence overestimating adherence rate. We propose the daily polypharmacy possession ratio (DPPR) as an index of adherence to polypharmacy. It estimates the proportion of time a patient had medication available for use by considering the presence or absence of multiple medications on each day in the observation period. We calculated possession rates from refill histories over 31 months (January 1, 2011-July 31, 2013) for three illustrative patients. The average MPR estimates were 80% for a patient with 6 medications/20 refill dates, 90% for a patient with 4 medications/11 refill dates, and 89% for a patient with 3 medications/17 refill dates. The corresponding DPPRs were 75, 88 and 99%, indicating overestimations by 5 and 2%, and underestimation by 10%, respectively. Conclusion: The DPPR accounts for the specificity of polypharmacy including number of medications, medication switching, duplication, overlapping. Research is needed to further confirm the validity of this new index.

AB - Background: Several measures for calculating adherence to one medication from dispensing data records have been proposed, but the nomenclature is inconsistent and computations vary. The same measures, like the medication possession ratio (MPR), have been used for multiple medication regimens, and have tended to over- or under-estimate adherence rates. Objective: To demonstrate the impact of varying elements in MPR to a single medication regimen; to define standards for the estimation of adherence to polypharmacy; to propose a new method for calculating adherence to polypharmacy; to face validate it. Setting: Face validity of the proposed method. Method: Variations in the MPR formula were simulated. Standards for the estimation of adherence to polypharmacy were defined. A new method to calculate adherence to polypharmacy was established. Its face validity with three illustrative cases obtained from a pharmacy refill database was assessed. Main outcome measure: Adherence rate to polypharmacy from refill data records. Results: MPR to a single medication is operationalized in the numerator and denominator and is influenced by the parameters like observation period, medication gaps, overlap. For polypharmacy, an average MPR is commonly used, which is not accounting for the specificity of multiple medications, and hence overestimating adherence rate. We propose the daily polypharmacy possession ratio (DPPR) as an index of adherence to polypharmacy. It estimates the proportion of time a patient had medication available for use by considering the presence or absence of multiple medications on each day in the observation period. We calculated possession rates from refill histories over 31 months (January 1, 2011-July 31, 2013) for three illustrative patients. The average MPR estimates were 80% for a patient with 6 medications/20 refill dates, 90% for a patient with 4 medications/11 refill dates, and 89% for a patient with 3 medications/17 refill dates. The corresponding DPPRs were 75, 88 and 99%, indicating overestimations by 5 and 2%, and underestimation by 10%, respectively. Conclusion: The DPPR accounts for the specificity of polypharmacy including number of medications, medication switching, duplication, overlapping. Research is needed to further confirm the validity of this new index.

KW - Adherence

KW - Compliance

KW - Daily polypharmacy possession ratio

KW - Medication possession ratio

KW - Pharmacy claims

KW - Polypharmacy

KW - Refill data

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899482381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899482381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11096-013-9891-8

DO - 10.1007/s11096-013-9891-8

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 192

EP - 201

JO - International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

JF - International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

SN - 2210-7703

IS - 1

ER -