A model for assessing wildlife habitats in urban landscapes of eastern Pima County, Arizona (USA)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The loss of large natural areas due to development has increased interest for and use of vegetated areas in urban and suburban areas for wildlife habitats. The goal of this study was to quantify vegetation characteristics for each type of land cover found in the greater Tucson, Arizona area, thereby providing a predictive tool for wildlife management and other land management issues. This research was based on and is a continuation of a pilot study that developed a method associating land cover categories to aerial photographs in eastern Pima County, including the City of Tucson. Aggregation of land cover categories used by Tucson and Pima County and verifications of any uncertain classifications of land cover with field evaluations produced a consistent land cover classification system and database. Natural open space was the largest land cover category within our study area, comprising 52% of the total land cover. Riparian areas, low-density housing and natural open space areas had the highest percentage of native vegetation and escape cover. Golf and neighborhood parks ranked much lower than these land covers relative to native vegetation and escape cover (vegetation with foliage/stems at ground level). The most structurally diverse plant communities were associated with medium density residential areas and zoos that contain a relatively high number of exotic species. Results from the wildlife habitats index indicated riparian areas as the most valuable habitats in eastern Pima County (the county where Tucson is located), followed by low-density housing (≤1 residence/acre), natural open space, and federal/state parks and forests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-144
Number of pages14
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume64
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2003

Fingerprint

wildlife habitats
land cover
open space
riparian areas
vegetation
taxonomy
suburban areas
residential areas
zoo
wildlife management
wildlife habitat
urban landscape
suburban area
zoos
land management
vegetation cover
aerial photograph
urban areas
foliage
photographs

Keywords

  • Arizona
  • Urban land cover
  • Vegetation cover
  • Wildlife habitats

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

A model for assessing wildlife habitats in urban landscapes of eastern Pima County, Arizona (USA). / Livingston, Margaret; Shaw, William W; Harris, Lisa K.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 64, No. 3, 15.07.2003, p. 131-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{33a8c58b3dca420aa9b629f7a11bf3d9,
title = "A model for assessing wildlife habitats in urban landscapes of eastern Pima County, Arizona (USA)",
abstract = "The loss of large natural areas due to development has increased interest for and use of vegetated areas in urban and suburban areas for wildlife habitats. The goal of this study was to quantify vegetation characteristics for each type of land cover found in the greater Tucson, Arizona area, thereby providing a predictive tool for wildlife management and other land management issues. This research was based on and is a continuation of a pilot study that developed a method associating land cover categories to aerial photographs in eastern Pima County, including the City of Tucson. Aggregation of land cover categories used by Tucson and Pima County and verifications of any uncertain classifications of land cover with field evaluations produced a consistent land cover classification system and database. Natural open space was the largest land cover category within our study area, comprising 52{\%} of the total land cover. Riparian areas, low-density housing and natural open space areas had the highest percentage of native vegetation and escape cover. Golf and neighborhood parks ranked much lower than these land covers relative to native vegetation and escape cover (vegetation with foliage/stems at ground level). The most structurally diverse plant communities were associated with medium density residential areas and zoos that contain a relatively high number of exotic species. Results from the wildlife habitats index indicated riparian areas as the most valuable habitats in eastern Pima County (the county where Tucson is located), followed by low-density housing (≤1 residence/acre), natural open space, and federal/state parks and forests.",
keywords = "Arizona, Urban land cover, Vegetation cover, Wildlife habitats",
author = "Margaret Livingston and Shaw, {William W} and Harris, {Lisa K.}",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00217-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "131--144",
journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A model for assessing wildlife habitats in urban landscapes of eastern Pima County, Arizona (USA)

AU - Livingston, Margaret

AU - Shaw, William W

AU - Harris, Lisa K.

PY - 2003/7/15

Y1 - 2003/7/15

N2 - The loss of large natural areas due to development has increased interest for and use of vegetated areas in urban and suburban areas for wildlife habitats. The goal of this study was to quantify vegetation characteristics for each type of land cover found in the greater Tucson, Arizona area, thereby providing a predictive tool for wildlife management and other land management issues. This research was based on and is a continuation of a pilot study that developed a method associating land cover categories to aerial photographs in eastern Pima County, including the City of Tucson. Aggregation of land cover categories used by Tucson and Pima County and verifications of any uncertain classifications of land cover with field evaluations produced a consistent land cover classification system and database. Natural open space was the largest land cover category within our study area, comprising 52% of the total land cover. Riparian areas, low-density housing and natural open space areas had the highest percentage of native vegetation and escape cover. Golf and neighborhood parks ranked much lower than these land covers relative to native vegetation and escape cover (vegetation with foliage/stems at ground level). The most structurally diverse plant communities were associated with medium density residential areas and zoos that contain a relatively high number of exotic species. Results from the wildlife habitats index indicated riparian areas as the most valuable habitats in eastern Pima County (the county where Tucson is located), followed by low-density housing (≤1 residence/acre), natural open space, and federal/state parks and forests.

AB - The loss of large natural areas due to development has increased interest for and use of vegetated areas in urban and suburban areas for wildlife habitats. The goal of this study was to quantify vegetation characteristics for each type of land cover found in the greater Tucson, Arizona area, thereby providing a predictive tool for wildlife management and other land management issues. This research was based on and is a continuation of a pilot study that developed a method associating land cover categories to aerial photographs in eastern Pima County, including the City of Tucson. Aggregation of land cover categories used by Tucson and Pima County and verifications of any uncertain classifications of land cover with field evaluations produced a consistent land cover classification system and database. Natural open space was the largest land cover category within our study area, comprising 52% of the total land cover. Riparian areas, low-density housing and natural open space areas had the highest percentage of native vegetation and escape cover. Golf and neighborhood parks ranked much lower than these land covers relative to native vegetation and escape cover (vegetation with foliage/stems at ground level). The most structurally diverse plant communities were associated with medium density residential areas and zoos that contain a relatively high number of exotic species. Results from the wildlife habitats index indicated riparian areas as the most valuable habitats in eastern Pima County (the county where Tucson is located), followed by low-density housing (≤1 residence/acre), natural open space, and federal/state parks and forests.

KW - Arizona

KW - Urban land cover

KW - Vegetation cover

KW - Wildlife habitats

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037937580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037937580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00217-7

DO - 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00217-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0037937580

VL - 64

SP - 131

EP - 144

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

SN - 0169-2046

IS - 3

ER -