A new model for recognizing and rewarding the educational accomplishments of surgery faculty

Ajit K. Sachdeva, Robert Cohen, Merril T. Dayton, James C. Hebert, Chris Jamieson, Leigh A Neumayer, Kenneth W. Sharp, Richard K. Spence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Faculty members' educational endeavors have generally not received adequate recognition. The Association for Surgical Education in 1993 established a task force to determine the magnitude of this problem and to create a model to address the challenges and opportunities identified. To obtain baseline information, the task force reviewed information from national sources and the literature on recognizing and rewarding faculty members for educational accomplishments. The group also developed and mailed to surgery departments at all U.S. and Canadian medical schools a questionnaire asking about the educational endeavors of the surgery faculty and their recognition for such activities. The response rate after two mailings was only 56%, but the responses reaffirmed the inadequacy of systems for rewarding and recognizing surgeon-teachers and surgeon-educators, and confirmed that the distinction between the roles of teacher and educator was rarely made. The task force created a fourtier hierarchical model based on the designations teacher, master teacher, educator, and master educator as a framework to offer appropriate recognition and rewards to the faculty, and endorsed a broad definition of educational scholarship. Criteria for various levels of achievement, ways to demonstrate and document educational contributions, appropriate support and recognition, and suggested faculty ranks were defined for these levels. The task force recommended that each surgery department have within its faculty ranks a cadre of trained teachers a few master teachers, and at least one educator. Departments with a major commitment to education should consider supporting a master educator to serve as a resource not only for the department but also for the department's medical school and other medical schools. Although this model was created for surgery departments, it is generalizable to other disciplines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1278-1287
Number of pages10
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume74
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

surgery
Advisory Committees
educator
Medical Schools
teacher
Education
school
Reward
cadre
reward
education
commitment
Recognition (Psychology)
questionnaire
resources
Group
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Education

Cite this

Sachdeva, A. K., Cohen, R., Dayton, M. T., Hebert, J. C., Jamieson, C., Neumayer, L. A., ... Spence, R. K. (1999). A new model for recognizing and rewarding the educational accomplishments of surgery faculty. Academic Medicine, 74(12), 1278-1287.

A new model for recognizing and rewarding the educational accomplishments of surgery faculty. / Sachdeva, Ajit K.; Cohen, Robert; Dayton, Merril T.; Hebert, James C.; Jamieson, Chris; Neumayer, Leigh A; Sharp, Kenneth W.; Spence, Richard K.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 74, No. 12, 12.1999, p. 1278-1287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sachdeva, AK, Cohen, R, Dayton, MT, Hebert, JC, Jamieson, C, Neumayer, LA, Sharp, KW & Spence, RK 1999, 'A new model for recognizing and rewarding the educational accomplishments of surgery faculty', Academic Medicine, vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 1278-1287.
Sachdeva AK, Cohen R, Dayton MT, Hebert JC, Jamieson C, Neumayer LA et al. A new model for recognizing and rewarding the educational accomplishments of surgery faculty. Academic Medicine. 1999 Dec;74(12):1278-1287.
Sachdeva, Ajit K. ; Cohen, Robert ; Dayton, Merril T. ; Hebert, James C. ; Jamieson, Chris ; Neumayer, Leigh A ; Sharp, Kenneth W. ; Spence, Richard K. / A new model for recognizing and rewarding the educational accomplishments of surgery faculty. In: Academic Medicine. 1999 ; Vol. 74, No. 12. pp. 1278-1287.
@article{325e986911304b809d14c2ffe784b2ec,
title = "A new model for recognizing and rewarding the educational accomplishments of surgery faculty",
abstract = "Faculty members' educational endeavors have generally not received adequate recognition. The Association for Surgical Education in 1993 established a task force to determine the magnitude of this problem and to create a model to address the challenges and opportunities identified. To obtain baseline information, the task force reviewed information from national sources and the literature on recognizing and rewarding faculty members for educational accomplishments. The group also developed and mailed to surgery departments at all U.S. and Canadian medical schools a questionnaire asking about the educational endeavors of the surgery faculty and their recognition for such activities. The response rate after two mailings was only 56{\%}, but the responses reaffirmed the inadequacy of systems for rewarding and recognizing surgeon-teachers and surgeon-educators, and confirmed that the distinction between the roles of teacher and educator was rarely made. The task force created a fourtier hierarchical model based on the designations teacher, master teacher, educator, and master educator as a framework to offer appropriate recognition and rewards to the faculty, and endorsed a broad definition of educational scholarship. Criteria for various levels of achievement, ways to demonstrate and document educational contributions, appropriate support and recognition, and suggested faculty ranks were defined for these levels. The task force recommended that each surgery department have within its faculty ranks a cadre of trained teachers a few master teachers, and at least one educator. Departments with a major commitment to education should consider supporting a master educator to serve as a resource not only for the department but also for the department's medical school and other medical schools. Although this model was created for surgery departments, it is generalizable to other disciplines.",
author = "Sachdeva, {Ajit K.} and Robert Cohen and Dayton, {Merril T.} and Hebert, {James C.} and Chris Jamieson and Neumayer, {Leigh A} and Sharp, {Kenneth W.} and Spence, {Richard K.}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "1278--1287",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new model for recognizing and rewarding the educational accomplishments of surgery faculty

AU - Sachdeva, Ajit K.

AU - Cohen, Robert

AU - Dayton, Merril T.

AU - Hebert, James C.

AU - Jamieson, Chris

AU - Neumayer, Leigh A

AU - Sharp, Kenneth W.

AU - Spence, Richard K.

PY - 1999/12

Y1 - 1999/12

N2 - Faculty members' educational endeavors have generally not received adequate recognition. The Association for Surgical Education in 1993 established a task force to determine the magnitude of this problem and to create a model to address the challenges and opportunities identified. To obtain baseline information, the task force reviewed information from national sources and the literature on recognizing and rewarding faculty members for educational accomplishments. The group also developed and mailed to surgery departments at all U.S. and Canadian medical schools a questionnaire asking about the educational endeavors of the surgery faculty and their recognition for such activities. The response rate after two mailings was only 56%, but the responses reaffirmed the inadequacy of systems for rewarding and recognizing surgeon-teachers and surgeon-educators, and confirmed that the distinction between the roles of teacher and educator was rarely made. The task force created a fourtier hierarchical model based on the designations teacher, master teacher, educator, and master educator as a framework to offer appropriate recognition and rewards to the faculty, and endorsed a broad definition of educational scholarship. Criteria for various levels of achievement, ways to demonstrate and document educational contributions, appropriate support and recognition, and suggested faculty ranks were defined for these levels. The task force recommended that each surgery department have within its faculty ranks a cadre of trained teachers a few master teachers, and at least one educator. Departments with a major commitment to education should consider supporting a master educator to serve as a resource not only for the department but also for the department's medical school and other medical schools. Although this model was created for surgery departments, it is generalizable to other disciplines.

AB - Faculty members' educational endeavors have generally not received adequate recognition. The Association for Surgical Education in 1993 established a task force to determine the magnitude of this problem and to create a model to address the challenges and opportunities identified. To obtain baseline information, the task force reviewed information from national sources and the literature on recognizing and rewarding faculty members for educational accomplishments. The group also developed and mailed to surgery departments at all U.S. and Canadian medical schools a questionnaire asking about the educational endeavors of the surgery faculty and their recognition for such activities. The response rate after two mailings was only 56%, but the responses reaffirmed the inadequacy of systems for rewarding and recognizing surgeon-teachers and surgeon-educators, and confirmed that the distinction between the roles of teacher and educator was rarely made. The task force created a fourtier hierarchical model based on the designations teacher, master teacher, educator, and master educator as a framework to offer appropriate recognition and rewards to the faculty, and endorsed a broad definition of educational scholarship. Criteria for various levels of achievement, ways to demonstrate and document educational contributions, appropriate support and recognition, and suggested faculty ranks were defined for these levels. The task force recommended that each surgery department have within its faculty ranks a cadre of trained teachers a few master teachers, and at least one educator. Departments with a major commitment to education should consider supporting a master educator to serve as a resource not only for the department but also for the department's medical school and other medical schools. Although this model was created for surgery departments, it is generalizable to other disciplines.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033377565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033377565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10619002

AN - SCOPUS:0033377565

VL - 74

SP - 1278

EP - 1287

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 12

ER -