A new rabbit monoclonal antibody (4B5) for the immunohistochemical (IHC) determination of the HER2 status in breast cancer

Comparison with CB11, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and interlaboratory reproducibility

William C. Powell, David G. Hicks, Nichole Prescott, Shannon M. Tarr, Simas Laniauskas, Tristin Williams, Sarah Short, James Pettay, Raymond B Nagle, David J. Dabbs, Katherine M. Scott, Richard W. Brown, Thomas Grogan, Patrick C. Roche, Raymond R. Tubbs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 2 methodologies in current clinical use to assess HER2 status in breast cancer are: fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (gene amplification) and immunohistochemistry (protein over-expression). A consistent finding has been that 3% to 15% of breast cancers over-express HER2 protein without evidence for gene amplification. Accurate determination of the HER2 status has implications for selecting patients most likely to respond to trastuzumab. We report here our preliminary experience with a new anti-HER2 rabbit monoclonal antibody, 4B5. The evaluation of HER2 status in 2 different cohorts of breast cancer cases (Single Institution (SI) and Multinational (MN)) with a total of 322 breast cancer cases was performed on an automated staining system (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Tucson, AZ) and scored by 3 pathologists (0-3+), for comparison with CB11 staining results (PATHWAY) and FISH (PathVysion). Interlaboratory reproducibility of automated staining results and interpretation was determined on a subset of the SI cohort at 3 separate laboratories. Rabbit monoclonal 4B5 demonstrated sharper membrane staining with less cytoplasmic and stromal background staining than CB11. In the SI cohort, the staining results for 4B5 were highly comparable with those obtained for CB11 with an overall concordance of 93.3%. In the multinational cohort, the overall concordance with CB11 was 84.7%. This lower level of concordance was associated with a much higher overall agreement of 4B5 with FISH (89.5%), compared with agreement of CB11 with FISH (81.2%). The difference in the performance of CB11 in the MN cohort versus the SI cohort may be due to differences in tissue fixation and processing in a centralized, high volume laboratory in an academic medical center versus multiple sites in the international community with potentially nonstandardized techniques. The staining results with 4B5 indicate that it has a more robust performance than CB11 because the correlation of 4B5 with FISH was nearly equivalent (88.2% MN; 89.3% SI) in both cohorts. Interlaboratory reproducibility was also excellent (κ 1.0). RMoAb 4B5 provides excellent sensitivity, specificity, and interlaboratory reproducibility for the detection of HER2 status in breast cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)94-102
Number of pages9
JournalApplied Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Monoclonal Antibodies
Staining and Labeling
Breast Neoplasms
Rabbits
Gene Amplification
Tissue Fixation
Proteins
Immunohistochemistry
Sensitivity and Specificity
Membranes

Keywords

  • 4B5
  • Breast cancer
  • HER2
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Rabbit monoclonal antibodies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Cite this

A new rabbit monoclonal antibody (4B5) for the immunohistochemical (IHC) determination of the HER2 status in breast cancer : Comparison with CB11, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and interlaboratory reproducibility. / Powell, William C.; Hicks, David G.; Prescott, Nichole; Tarr, Shannon M.; Laniauskas, Simas; Williams, Tristin; Short, Sarah; Pettay, James; Nagle, Raymond B; Dabbs, David J.; Scott, Katherine M.; Brown, Richard W.; Grogan, Thomas; Roche, Patrick C.; Tubbs, Raymond R.

In: Applied Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 03.2007, p. 94-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Powell, William C. ; Hicks, David G. ; Prescott, Nichole ; Tarr, Shannon M. ; Laniauskas, Simas ; Williams, Tristin ; Short, Sarah ; Pettay, James ; Nagle, Raymond B ; Dabbs, David J. ; Scott, Katherine M. ; Brown, Richard W. ; Grogan, Thomas ; Roche, Patrick C. ; Tubbs, Raymond R. / A new rabbit monoclonal antibody (4B5) for the immunohistochemical (IHC) determination of the HER2 status in breast cancer : Comparison with CB11, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and interlaboratory reproducibility. In: Applied Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology. 2007 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 94-102.
@article{109dd61de934454cb634530ffd43dd7d,
title = "A new rabbit monoclonal antibody (4B5) for the immunohistochemical (IHC) determination of the HER2 status in breast cancer: Comparison with CB11, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and interlaboratory reproducibility",
abstract = "The 2 methodologies in current clinical use to assess HER2 status in breast cancer are: fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (gene amplification) and immunohistochemistry (protein over-expression). A consistent finding has been that 3{\%} to 15{\%} of breast cancers over-express HER2 protein without evidence for gene amplification. Accurate determination of the HER2 status has implications for selecting patients most likely to respond to trastuzumab. We report here our preliminary experience with a new anti-HER2 rabbit monoclonal antibody, 4B5. The evaluation of HER2 status in 2 different cohorts of breast cancer cases (Single Institution (SI) and Multinational (MN)) with a total of 322 breast cancer cases was performed on an automated staining system (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Tucson, AZ) and scored by 3 pathologists (0-3+), for comparison with CB11 staining results (PATHWAY) and FISH (PathVysion). Interlaboratory reproducibility of automated staining results and interpretation was determined on a subset of the SI cohort at 3 separate laboratories. Rabbit monoclonal 4B5 demonstrated sharper membrane staining with less cytoplasmic and stromal background staining than CB11. In the SI cohort, the staining results for 4B5 were highly comparable with those obtained for CB11 with an overall concordance of 93.3{\%}. In the multinational cohort, the overall concordance with CB11 was 84.7{\%}. This lower level of concordance was associated with a much higher overall agreement of 4B5 with FISH (89.5{\%}), compared with agreement of CB11 with FISH (81.2{\%}). The difference in the performance of CB11 in the MN cohort versus the SI cohort may be due to differences in tissue fixation and processing in a centralized, high volume laboratory in an academic medical center versus multiple sites in the international community with potentially nonstandardized techniques. The staining results with 4B5 indicate that it has a more robust performance than CB11 because the correlation of 4B5 with FISH was nearly equivalent (88.2{\%} MN; 89.3{\%} SI) in both cohorts. Interlaboratory reproducibility was also excellent (κ 1.0). RMoAb 4B5 provides excellent sensitivity, specificity, and interlaboratory reproducibility for the detection of HER2 status in breast cancer.",
keywords = "4B5, Breast cancer, HER2, Immunohistochemistry, Rabbit monoclonal antibodies",
author = "Powell, {William C.} and Hicks, {David G.} and Nichole Prescott and Tarr, {Shannon M.} and Simas Laniauskas and Tristin Williams and Sarah Short and James Pettay and Nagle, {Raymond B} and Dabbs, {David J.} and Scott, {Katherine M.} and Brown, {Richard W.} and Thomas Grogan and Roche, {Patrick C.} and Tubbs, {Raymond R.}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/PAI.0b013e31802ced25",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "94--102",
journal = "Applied Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology",
issn = "1541-2016",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new rabbit monoclonal antibody (4B5) for the immunohistochemical (IHC) determination of the HER2 status in breast cancer

T2 - Comparison with CB11, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and interlaboratory reproducibility

AU - Powell, William C.

AU - Hicks, David G.

AU - Prescott, Nichole

AU - Tarr, Shannon M.

AU - Laniauskas, Simas

AU - Williams, Tristin

AU - Short, Sarah

AU - Pettay, James

AU - Nagle, Raymond B

AU - Dabbs, David J.

AU - Scott, Katherine M.

AU - Brown, Richard W.

AU - Grogan, Thomas

AU - Roche, Patrick C.

AU - Tubbs, Raymond R.

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - The 2 methodologies in current clinical use to assess HER2 status in breast cancer are: fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (gene amplification) and immunohistochemistry (protein over-expression). A consistent finding has been that 3% to 15% of breast cancers over-express HER2 protein without evidence for gene amplification. Accurate determination of the HER2 status has implications for selecting patients most likely to respond to trastuzumab. We report here our preliminary experience with a new anti-HER2 rabbit monoclonal antibody, 4B5. The evaluation of HER2 status in 2 different cohorts of breast cancer cases (Single Institution (SI) and Multinational (MN)) with a total of 322 breast cancer cases was performed on an automated staining system (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Tucson, AZ) and scored by 3 pathologists (0-3+), for comparison with CB11 staining results (PATHWAY) and FISH (PathVysion). Interlaboratory reproducibility of automated staining results and interpretation was determined on a subset of the SI cohort at 3 separate laboratories. Rabbit monoclonal 4B5 demonstrated sharper membrane staining with less cytoplasmic and stromal background staining than CB11. In the SI cohort, the staining results for 4B5 were highly comparable with those obtained for CB11 with an overall concordance of 93.3%. In the multinational cohort, the overall concordance with CB11 was 84.7%. This lower level of concordance was associated with a much higher overall agreement of 4B5 with FISH (89.5%), compared with agreement of CB11 with FISH (81.2%). The difference in the performance of CB11 in the MN cohort versus the SI cohort may be due to differences in tissue fixation and processing in a centralized, high volume laboratory in an academic medical center versus multiple sites in the international community with potentially nonstandardized techniques. The staining results with 4B5 indicate that it has a more robust performance than CB11 because the correlation of 4B5 with FISH was nearly equivalent (88.2% MN; 89.3% SI) in both cohorts. Interlaboratory reproducibility was also excellent (κ 1.0). RMoAb 4B5 provides excellent sensitivity, specificity, and interlaboratory reproducibility for the detection of HER2 status in breast cancer.

AB - The 2 methodologies in current clinical use to assess HER2 status in breast cancer are: fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (gene amplification) and immunohistochemistry (protein over-expression). A consistent finding has been that 3% to 15% of breast cancers over-express HER2 protein without evidence for gene amplification. Accurate determination of the HER2 status has implications for selecting patients most likely to respond to trastuzumab. We report here our preliminary experience with a new anti-HER2 rabbit monoclonal antibody, 4B5. The evaluation of HER2 status in 2 different cohorts of breast cancer cases (Single Institution (SI) and Multinational (MN)) with a total of 322 breast cancer cases was performed on an automated staining system (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Tucson, AZ) and scored by 3 pathologists (0-3+), for comparison with CB11 staining results (PATHWAY) and FISH (PathVysion). Interlaboratory reproducibility of automated staining results and interpretation was determined on a subset of the SI cohort at 3 separate laboratories. Rabbit monoclonal 4B5 demonstrated sharper membrane staining with less cytoplasmic and stromal background staining than CB11. In the SI cohort, the staining results for 4B5 were highly comparable with those obtained for CB11 with an overall concordance of 93.3%. In the multinational cohort, the overall concordance with CB11 was 84.7%. This lower level of concordance was associated with a much higher overall agreement of 4B5 with FISH (89.5%), compared with agreement of CB11 with FISH (81.2%). The difference in the performance of CB11 in the MN cohort versus the SI cohort may be due to differences in tissue fixation and processing in a centralized, high volume laboratory in an academic medical center versus multiple sites in the international community with potentially nonstandardized techniques. The staining results with 4B5 indicate that it has a more robust performance than CB11 because the correlation of 4B5 with FISH was nearly equivalent (88.2% MN; 89.3% SI) in both cohorts. Interlaboratory reproducibility was also excellent (κ 1.0). RMoAb 4B5 provides excellent sensitivity, specificity, and interlaboratory reproducibility for the detection of HER2 status in breast cancer.

KW - 4B5

KW - Breast cancer

KW - HER2

KW - Immunohistochemistry

KW - Rabbit monoclonal antibodies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247592534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247592534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PAI.0b013e31802ced25

DO - 10.1097/PAI.0b013e31802ced25

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 94

EP - 102

JO - Applied Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology

JF - Applied Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology

SN - 1541-2016

IS - 1

ER -