A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction

A pilot study

Elizabeth A Krupinski, Merce Comas, Leia Garrote Gallego, Behalf Of The Gismar Group On Behalf Of The Gismar Group, Sergio Serrano, Belén Lloveras, Ignasi Tusquets, Maria Vernet-Tomas, Ana Rodríguez, Mar Iglesias, Laia Serrano, Joan Albanell, Rodrigo Alcántara, Xavier Castells, Inma Collet, Laura Comerma, Fernando Fernández, Valentí Juncà, Juan Martínez, Maria Martínez & 9 others Tamara Martos, Antoni Mestre-Fusco, Pau Nicolau, Francisco Plancarte, Noemí Rodríguez, Javier Sanz, Marcel Segura, Sònia Servitja, Ivonne Vázquez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Workflow and preparation for holding multidisciplinary cancer case reviews (i.e., Tumor Boards) is time-consuming and cumbersome. Use of a software platform might improve this process. This pilot study assessed the impact of a new software platform on tumor board preparation workflow and user satisfaction compared to current methods. Materials and Methods: Using current methods and the NAVIFY Tumor Board Solution, this study assessed the number of tasks and time to prepare tumor board cases. Participants completed online surveys assessing ease of use and satisfaction with current and new platforms. Results: A total of 41 sessions included two surgeons, two oncologists, two pathologists, and two radiologists preparing tumor board cases with 734 tasks were recorded. Overall, there was no difference in the number of tasks using either preparation method (341 current, 393 NAVIFY Tumor Board solution). There was a significant difference in overall preparation time as a function of specialty (F = 71.74, P < 0.0001), with oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons having reduced times with NAVIFY Tumor Board solution compared to the current platform and pathologists having equivalent times. There was a significant difference (F = 38.98, P < 0.0001) for times as a function of task category. Review of clinical course data and other preparation tasks decreased significantly, but pathology and radiology review did not differ significantly. The new platform received higher ratings than the current methods on all survey questions regarding the ease of use and satisfaction. Conclusions: The study supported the hypothesis that the new software platform can improve Tumor Board preparation. Further study is needed to assess the impact of this platform in different hospitals, different data storage systems, with different observers, and different types of Tumor board cases as well as its impact on the quality of the tumor board discussion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number26
JournalJournal of Pathology Informatics
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Workflow
Tumors
Software
Neoplasms
Radiology
Pathology
Information Storage and Retrieval
Information Systems
Data storage equipment

Keywords

  • Software platform
  • task analysis
  • tumor board preparation
  • user satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Health Informatics
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Krupinski, E. A., Comas, M., Gallego, L. G., On Behalf Of The Gismar Group, B. O. T. G. G., Serrano, S., Lloveras, B., ... Vázquez, I. (2018). A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: A pilot study. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 9(1), [26]. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_16_18

A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction : A pilot study. / Krupinski, Elizabeth A; Comas, Merce; Gallego, Leia Garrote; On Behalf Of The Gismar Group, Behalf Of The Gismar Group; Serrano, Sergio; Lloveras, Belén; Tusquets, Ignasi; Vernet-Tomas, Maria; Rodríguez, Ana; Iglesias, Mar; Serrano, Laia; Albanell, Joan; Alcántara, Rodrigo; Castells, Xavier; Collet, Inma; Comerma, Laura; Fernández, Fernando; Juncà, Valentí; Martínez, Juan; Martínez, Maria; Martos, Tamara; Mestre-Fusco, Antoni; Nicolau, Pau; Plancarte, Francisco; Rodríguez, Noemí; Sanz, Javier; Segura, Marcel; Servitja, Sònia; Vázquez, Ivonne.

In: Journal of Pathology Informatics, Vol. 9, No. 1, 26, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krupinski, EA, Comas, M, Gallego, LG, On Behalf Of The Gismar Group, BOTGG, Serrano, S, Lloveras, B, Tusquets, I, Vernet-Tomas, M, Rodríguez, A, Iglesias, M, Serrano, L, Albanell, J, Alcántara, R, Castells, X, Collet, I, Comerma, L, Fernández, F, Juncà, V, Martínez, J, Martínez, M, Martos, T, Mestre-Fusco, A, Nicolau, P, Plancarte, F, Rodríguez, N, Sanz, J, Segura, M, Servitja, S & Vázquez, I 2018, 'A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: A pilot study', Journal of Pathology Informatics, vol. 9, no. 1, 26. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_16_18
Krupinski, Elizabeth A ; Comas, Merce ; Gallego, Leia Garrote ; On Behalf Of The Gismar Group, Behalf Of The Gismar Group ; Serrano, Sergio ; Lloveras, Belén ; Tusquets, Ignasi ; Vernet-Tomas, Maria ; Rodríguez, Ana ; Iglesias, Mar ; Serrano, Laia ; Albanell, Joan ; Alcántara, Rodrigo ; Castells, Xavier ; Collet, Inma ; Comerma, Laura ; Fernández, Fernando ; Juncà, Valentí ; Martínez, Juan ; Martínez, Maria ; Martos, Tamara ; Mestre-Fusco, Antoni ; Nicolau, Pau ; Plancarte, Francisco ; Rodríguez, Noemí ; Sanz, Javier ; Segura, Marcel ; Servitja, Sònia ; Vázquez, Ivonne. / A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction : A pilot study. In: Journal of Pathology Informatics. 2018 ; Vol. 9, No. 1.
@article{be63e8c2edb9478f8e4611c47ec658c1,
title = "A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: A pilot study",
abstract = "Background: Workflow and preparation for holding multidisciplinary cancer case reviews (i.e., Tumor Boards) is time-consuming and cumbersome. Use of a software platform might improve this process. This pilot study assessed the impact of a new software platform on tumor board preparation workflow and user satisfaction compared to current methods. Materials and Methods: Using current methods and the NAVIFY Tumor Board Solution, this study assessed the number of tasks and time to prepare tumor board cases. Participants completed online surveys assessing ease of use and satisfaction with current and new platforms. Results: A total of 41 sessions included two surgeons, two oncologists, two pathologists, and two radiologists preparing tumor board cases with 734 tasks were recorded. Overall, there was no difference in the number of tasks using either preparation method (341 current, 393 NAVIFY Tumor Board solution). There was a significant difference in overall preparation time as a function of specialty (F = 71.74, P < 0.0001), with oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons having reduced times with NAVIFY Tumor Board solution compared to the current platform and pathologists having equivalent times. There was a significant difference (F = 38.98, P < 0.0001) for times as a function of task category. Review of clinical course data and other preparation tasks decreased significantly, but pathology and radiology review did not differ significantly. The new platform received higher ratings than the current methods on all survey questions regarding the ease of use and satisfaction. Conclusions: The study supported the hypothesis that the new software platform can improve Tumor Board preparation. Further study is needed to assess the impact of this platform in different hospitals, different data storage systems, with different observers, and different types of Tumor board cases as well as its impact on the quality of the tumor board discussion.",
keywords = "Software platform, task analysis, tumor board preparation, user satisfaction",
author = "Krupinski, {Elizabeth A} and Merce Comas and Gallego, {Leia Garrote} and {On Behalf Of The Gismar Group}, {Behalf Of The Gismar Group} and Sergio Serrano and Bel{\'e}n Lloveras and Ignasi Tusquets and Maria Vernet-Tomas and Ana Rodr{\'i}guez and Mar Iglesias and Laia Serrano and Joan Albanell and Rodrigo Alc{\'a}ntara and Xavier Castells and Inma Collet and Laura Comerma and Fernando Fern{\'a}ndez and Valent{\'i} Junc{\`a} and Juan Mart{\'i}nez and Maria Mart{\'i}nez and Tamara Martos and Antoni Mestre-Fusco and Pau Nicolau and Francisco Plancarte and Noem{\'i} Rodr{\'i}guez and Javier Sanz and Marcel Segura and S{\`o}nia Servitja and Ivonne V{\'a}zquez",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/jpi.jpi_16_18",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Journal of Pathology Informatics",
issn = "2229-5089",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction

T2 - A pilot study

AU - Krupinski, Elizabeth A

AU - Comas, Merce

AU - Gallego, Leia Garrote

AU - On Behalf Of The Gismar Group, Behalf Of The Gismar Group

AU - Serrano, Sergio

AU - Lloveras, Belén

AU - Tusquets, Ignasi

AU - Vernet-Tomas, Maria

AU - Rodríguez, Ana

AU - Iglesias, Mar

AU - Serrano, Laia

AU - Albanell, Joan

AU - Alcántara, Rodrigo

AU - Castells, Xavier

AU - Collet, Inma

AU - Comerma, Laura

AU - Fernández, Fernando

AU - Juncà, Valentí

AU - Martínez, Juan

AU - Martínez, Maria

AU - Martos, Tamara

AU - Mestre-Fusco, Antoni

AU - Nicolau, Pau

AU - Plancarte, Francisco

AU - Rodríguez, Noemí

AU - Sanz, Javier

AU - Segura, Marcel

AU - Servitja, Sònia

AU - Vázquez, Ivonne

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Workflow and preparation for holding multidisciplinary cancer case reviews (i.e., Tumor Boards) is time-consuming and cumbersome. Use of a software platform might improve this process. This pilot study assessed the impact of a new software platform on tumor board preparation workflow and user satisfaction compared to current methods. Materials and Methods: Using current methods and the NAVIFY Tumor Board Solution, this study assessed the number of tasks and time to prepare tumor board cases. Participants completed online surveys assessing ease of use and satisfaction with current and new platforms. Results: A total of 41 sessions included two surgeons, two oncologists, two pathologists, and two radiologists preparing tumor board cases with 734 tasks were recorded. Overall, there was no difference in the number of tasks using either preparation method (341 current, 393 NAVIFY Tumor Board solution). There was a significant difference in overall preparation time as a function of specialty (F = 71.74, P < 0.0001), with oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons having reduced times with NAVIFY Tumor Board solution compared to the current platform and pathologists having equivalent times. There was a significant difference (F = 38.98, P < 0.0001) for times as a function of task category. Review of clinical course data and other preparation tasks decreased significantly, but pathology and radiology review did not differ significantly. The new platform received higher ratings than the current methods on all survey questions regarding the ease of use and satisfaction. Conclusions: The study supported the hypothesis that the new software platform can improve Tumor Board preparation. Further study is needed to assess the impact of this platform in different hospitals, different data storage systems, with different observers, and different types of Tumor board cases as well as its impact on the quality of the tumor board discussion.

AB - Background: Workflow and preparation for holding multidisciplinary cancer case reviews (i.e., Tumor Boards) is time-consuming and cumbersome. Use of a software platform might improve this process. This pilot study assessed the impact of a new software platform on tumor board preparation workflow and user satisfaction compared to current methods. Materials and Methods: Using current methods and the NAVIFY Tumor Board Solution, this study assessed the number of tasks and time to prepare tumor board cases. Participants completed online surveys assessing ease of use and satisfaction with current and new platforms. Results: A total of 41 sessions included two surgeons, two oncologists, two pathologists, and two radiologists preparing tumor board cases with 734 tasks were recorded. Overall, there was no difference in the number of tasks using either preparation method (341 current, 393 NAVIFY Tumor Board solution). There was a significant difference in overall preparation time as a function of specialty (F = 71.74, P < 0.0001), with oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons having reduced times with NAVIFY Tumor Board solution compared to the current platform and pathologists having equivalent times. There was a significant difference (F = 38.98, P < 0.0001) for times as a function of task category. Review of clinical course data and other preparation tasks decreased significantly, but pathology and radiology review did not differ significantly. The new platform received higher ratings than the current methods on all survey questions regarding the ease of use and satisfaction. Conclusions: The study supported the hypothesis that the new software platform can improve Tumor Board preparation. Further study is needed to assess the impact of this platform in different hospitals, different data storage systems, with different observers, and different types of Tumor board cases as well as its impact on the quality of the tumor board discussion.

KW - Software platform

KW - task analysis

KW - tumor board preparation

KW - user satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053382291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053382291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/jpi.jpi_16_18

DO - 10.4103/jpi.jpi_16_18

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Journal of Pathology Informatics

JF - Journal of Pathology Informatics

SN - 2229-5089

IS - 1

M1 - 26

ER -