A new view of insect-crustacean relationships I. Inferences from neural cladistics and comparative neuroanatomy

Nicholas J Strausfeld, David R. Andrew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditional hypotheses regarding the relationships of the major arthropod lineages focus on suites of comparable characters, often those that address features of the exoskeleton. However, because of the enormous morphological variety among arthropods, external characters may lead to ambiguities of interpretation and definition, particularly when species have undergone evolutionary simplification and reversal. Here we present the results of a cladistic analysis using morphological characters associated with brains and central nervous systems, based on the evidence that cerebral organization is generally robust over geological time. Well-resolved, strongly supported phylogenies were obtained from a neuromorphological character set representing a variety of discrete neuroanatomical traits. Phylogenetic hypotheses from this analysis support many accepted relationships, including monophyletic Chelicerata, Myriapoda, and Hexapoda, paraphyletic Crustacea and the union of Hexapoda and Crustacea (Tetraconata). They also support Mandibulata (Myriapoda + Tetraconata). One problematic result, which can be explained by symplesiomorphies that are likely to have evolved in deep time, is the inability to resolve Onychophora as a taxon distinct from Arthropoda. Crucially, neuronal cladistics supports the heterodox conclusion that both Hexapoda and Malacostraca are derived from a common ancestor that possessed a suite of discrete neural centers comprising an elaborate brain. Remipedes and copepods, both resolved as basal to Branchiopoda share a neural ground pattern with Malacostraca. These findings distinguish Hexapoda (Insecta) from Branchiopoda, which is the sister group of the clade Malacostraca + Hexapoda. The present study resolves branchiopod crustaceans as descendents of an ancestor with a complex brain, which means that they have evolved secondary simplification and the loss or reduction of numerous neural systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)276-288
Number of pages13
JournalArthropod Structure and Development
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Hexapoda
Neuroanatomy
Arthropods
cladistics
Insects
crustacean
Crustacea
brain
Malacostraca
insect
arthropod
insects
phylogeny
Myriapoda
Brain
Branchiopoda
Copepoda
exoskeleton
geological time
common ancestry

Keywords

  • Branchiopoda
  • Character loss
  • Cladistics
  • Evolution
  • Insecta
  • Malacostraca
  • Neuroanatomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Insect Science
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Developmental Biology

Cite this

A new view of insect-crustacean relationships I. Inferences from neural cladistics and comparative neuroanatomy. / Strausfeld, Nicholas J; Andrew, David R.

In: Arthropod Structure and Development, Vol. 40, No. 3, 05.2011, p. 276-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{26fd66862d224d16bc36e70416d91d9b,
title = "A new view of insect-crustacean relationships I. Inferences from neural cladistics and comparative neuroanatomy",
abstract = "Traditional hypotheses regarding the relationships of the major arthropod lineages focus on suites of comparable characters, often those that address features of the exoskeleton. However, because of the enormous morphological variety among arthropods, external characters may lead to ambiguities of interpretation and definition, particularly when species have undergone evolutionary simplification and reversal. Here we present the results of a cladistic analysis using morphological characters associated with brains and central nervous systems, based on the evidence that cerebral organization is generally robust over geological time. Well-resolved, strongly supported phylogenies were obtained from a neuromorphological character set representing a variety of discrete neuroanatomical traits. Phylogenetic hypotheses from this analysis support many accepted relationships, including monophyletic Chelicerata, Myriapoda, and Hexapoda, paraphyletic Crustacea and the union of Hexapoda and Crustacea (Tetraconata). They also support Mandibulata (Myriapoda + Tetraconata). One problematic result, which can be explained by symplesiomorphies that are likely to have evolved in deep time, is the inability to resolve Onychophora as a taxon distinct from Arthropoda. Crucially, neuronal cladistics supports the heterodox conclusion that both Hexapoda and Malacostraca are derived from a common ancestor that possessed a suite of discrete neural centers comprising an elaborate brain. Remipedes and copepods, both resolved as basal to Branchiopoda share a neural ground pattern with Malacostraca. These findings distinguish Hexapoda (Insecta) from Branchiopoda, which is the sister group of the clade Malacostraca + Hexapoda. The present study resolves branchiopod crustaceans as descendents of an ancestor with a complex brain, which means that they have evolved secondary simplification and the loss or reduction of numerous neural systems.",
keywords = "Branchiopoda, Character loss, Cladistics, Evolution, Insecta, Malacostraca, Neuroanatomy",
author = "Strausfeld, {Nicholas J} and Andrew, {David R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.asd.2011.02.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "276--288",
journal = "Arthropod Structure and Development",
issn = "1467-8039",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new view of insect-crustacean relationships I. Inferences from neural cladistics and comparative neuroanatomy

AU - Strausfeld, Nicholas J

AU - Andrew, David R.

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Traditional hypotheses regarding the relationships of the major arthropod lineages focus on suites of comparable characters, often those that address features of the exoskeleton. However, because of the enormous morphological variety among arthropods, external characters may lead to ambiguities of interpretation and definition, particularly when species have undergone evolutionary simplification and reversal. Here we present the results of a cladistic analysis using morphological characters associated with brains and central nervous systems, based on the evidence that cerebral organization is generally robust over geological time. Well-resolved, strongly supported phylogenies were obtained from a neuromorphological character set representing a variety of discrete neuroanatomical traits. Phylogenetic hypotheses from this analysis support many accepted relationships, including monophyletic Chelicerata, Myriapoda, and Hexapoda, paraphyletic Crustacea and the union of Hexapoda and Crustacea (Tetraconata). They also support Mandibulata (Myriapoda + Tetraconata). One problematic result, which can be explained by symplesiomorphies that are likely to have evolved in deep time, is the inability to resolve Onychophora as a taxon distinct from Arthropoda. Crucially, neuronal cladistics supports the heterodox conclusion that both Hexapoda and Malacostraca are derived from a common ancestor that possessed a suite of discrete neural centers comprising an elaborate brain. Remipedes and copepods, both resolved as basal to Branchiopoda share a neural ground pattern with Malacostraca. These findings distinguish Hexapoda (Insecta) from Branchiopoda, which is the sister group of the clade Malacostraca + Hexapoda. The present study resolves branchiopod crustaceans as descendents of an ancestor with a complex brain, which means that they have evolved secondary simplification and the loss or reduction of numerous neural systems.

AB - Traditional hypotheses regarding the relationships of the major arthropod lineages focus on suites of comparable characters, often those that address features of the exoskeleton. However, because of the enormous morphological variety among arthropods, external characters may lead to ambiguities of interpretation and definition, particularly when species have undergone evolutionary simplification and reversal. Here we present the results of a cladistic analysis using morphological characters associated with brains and central nervous systems, based on the evidence that cerebral organization is generally robust over geological time. Well-resolved, strongly supported phylogenies were obtained from a neuromorphological character set representing a variety of discrete neuroanatomical traits. Phylogenetic hypotheses from this analysis support many accepted relationships, including monophyletic Chelicerata, Myriapoda, and Hexapoda, paraphyletic Crustacea and the union of Hexapoda and Crustacea (Tetraconata). They also support Mandibulata (Myriapoda + Tetraconata). One problematic result, which can be explained by symplesiomorphies that are likely to have evolved in deep time, is the inability to resolve Onychophora as a taxon distinct from Arthropoda. Crucially, neuronal cladistics supports the heterodox conclusion that both Hexapoda and Malacostraca are derived from a common ancestor that possessed a suite of discrete neural centers comprising an elaborate brain. Remipedes and copepods, both resolved as basal to Branchiopoda share a neural ground pattern with Malacostraca. These findings distinguish Hexapoda (Insecta) from Branchiopoda, which is the sister group of the clade Malacostraca + Hexapoda. The present study resolves branchiopod crustaceans as descendents of an ancestor with a complex brain, which means that they have evolved secondary simplification and the loss or reduction of numerous neural systems.

KW - Branchiopoda

KW - Character loss

KW - Cladistics

KW - Evolution

KW - Insecta

KW - Malacostraca

KW - Neuroanatomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958817190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958817190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.asd.2011.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.asd.2011.02.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 21333750

AN - SCOPUS:79958817190

VL - 40

SP - 276

EP - 288

JO - Arthropod Structure and Development

JF - Arthropod Structure and Development

SN - 1467-8039

IS - 3

ER -