A practical guide to conducting and writing medical record review studies

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

Purpose. A practical guide to conducting and reporting medical record review studies, including instruction and insights on topics ranging from idea conception to manuscript submission, is provided. Summary. Research based on the retrospective collection and analysis of data from medical records is often the first type of research conducted by new investigators; such research can be particularly useful in high-acuity populations and is often more feasible and cost-effective than prospective studies. The research process begins with formulating a valid hypothesis-driven or exploratory research question and refining it into one that is testable; this can be facilitated by incorporating information from various sources (e.g., relevant literature, consultation with experts, observations of practice). Accurate sample size calculations are important in ensuring study feasibility (i.e., the estimated sample sizes required can be obtained). Appropriate data collection methods are particularly crucial in medical record review studies; key considerations include pertinent variables, systematic subject identification, standardized data collection instruments, training of data collectors to minimize interrater variability, processes to ensure the accuracy and reliability of data, and blinded collection of the outcome variable. Checklists are provided to guide investigators in retrospective data collection, manuscript preparation, and decisions regarding authorship eligibility and sequencing. Conclusion. The quality of medical record review studies and the likelihood of their acceptance for publication can be improved through adherence to recommended standards of research design, data collection and analysis, ethical authorship, and manuscript preparation.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages1853-1864
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
Volume74
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 2017

Fingerprint

Medical Records
Research
Manuscripts
Authorship
Sample Size
Research Personnel
Feasibility Studies
Checklist
Publications
Research Design
Referral and Consultation
Prospective Studies
Costs and Cost Analysis
Population

Keywords

  • Manuscripts
  • Medical manuscripts
  • Publishing
  • Retrospective studies
  • Writing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Health Policy

Cite this

A practical guide to conducting and writing medical record review studies. / Patanwala, Asad E.

In: American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 74, No. 22, 15.11.2017, p. 1853-1864.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

@article{add6f68a923d4b989776d8b6b0c364f1,
title = "A practical guide to conducting and writing medical record review studies",
abstract = "Purpose. A practical guide to conducting and reporting medical record review studies, including instruction and insights on topics ranging from idea conception to manuscript submission, is provided. Summary. Research based on the retrospective collection and analysis of data from medical records is often the first type of research conducted by new investigators; such research can be particularly useful in high-acuity populations and is often more feasible and cost-effective than prospective studies. The research process begins with formulating a valid hypothesis-driven or exploratory research question and refining it into one that is testable; this can be facilitated by incorporating information from various sources (e.g., relevant literature, consultation with experts, observations of practice). Accurate sample size calculations are important in ensuring study feasibility (i.e., the estimated sample sizes required can be obtained). Appropriate data collection methods are particularly crucial in medical record review studies; key considerations include pertinent variables, systematic subject identification, standardized data collection instruments, training of data collectors to minimize interrater variability, processes to ensure the accuracy and reliability of data, and blinded collection of the outcome variable. Checklists are provided to guide investigators in retrospective data collection, manuscript preparation, and decisions regarding authorship eligibility and sequencing. Conclusion. The quality of medical record review studies and the likelihood of their acceptance for publication can be improved through adherence to recommended standards of research design, data collection and analysis, ethical authorship, and manuscript preparation.",
keywords = "Manuscripts, Medical manuscripts, Publishing, Retrospective studies, Writing",
author = "Patanwala, {Asad E.}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
doi = "10.2146/ajhp170183",
volume = "74",
pages = "1853--1864",
journal = "American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy",
issn = "1079-2082",
publisher = "American Society of Health-Systems Pharmacy",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A practical guide to conducting and writing medical record review studies

AU - Patanwala,Asad E.

PY - 2017/11/15

Y1 - 2017/11/15

N2 - Purpose. A practical guide to conducting and reporting medical record review studies, including instruction and insights on topics ranging from idea conception to manuscript submission, is provided. Summary. Research based on the retrospective collection and analysis of data from medical records is often the first type of research conducted by new investigators; such research can be particularly useful in high-acuity populations and is often more feasible and cost-effective than prospective studies. The research process begins with formulating a valid hypothesis-driven or exploratory research question and refining it into one that is testable; this can be facilitated by incorporating information from various sources (e.g., relevant literature, consultation with experts, observations of practice). Accurate sample size calculations are important in ensuring study feasibility (i.e., the estimated sample sizes required can be obtained). Appropriate data collection methods are particularly crucial in medical record review studies; key considerations include pertinent variables, systematic subject identification, standardized data collection instruments, training of data collectors to minimize interrater variability, processes to ensure the accuracy and reliability of data, and blinded collection of the outcome variable. Checklists are provided to guide investigators in retrospective data collection, manuscript preparation, and decisions regarding authorship eligibility and sequencing. Conclusion. The quality of medical record review studies and the likelihood of their acceptance for publication can be improved through adherence to recommended standards of research design, data collection and analysis, ethical authorship, and manuscript preparation.

AB - Purpose. A practical guide to conducting and reporting medical record review studies, including instruction and insights on topics ranging from idea conception to manuscript submission, is provided. Summary. Research based on the retrospective collection and analysis of data from medical records is often the first type of research conducted by new investigators; such research can be particularly useful in high-acuity populations and is often more feasible and cost-effective than prospective studies. The research process begins with formulating a valid hypothesis-driven or exploratory research question and refining it into one that is testable; this can be facilitated by incorporating information from various sources (e.g., relevant literature, consultation with experts, observations of practice). Accurate sample size calculations are important in ensuring study feasibility (i.e., the estimated sample sizes required can be obtained). Appropriate data collection methods are particularly crucial in medical record review studies; key considerations include pertinent variables, systematic subject identification, standardized data collection instruments, training of data collectors to minimize interrater variability, processes to ensure the accuracy and reliability of data, and blinded collection of the outcome variable. Checklists are provided to guide investigators in retrospective data collection, manuscript preparation, and decisions regarding authorship eligibility and sequencing. Conclusion. The quality of medical record review studies and the likelihood of their acceptance for publication can be improved through adherence to recommended standards of research design, data collection and analysis, ethical authorship, and manuscript preparation.

KW - Manuscripts

KW - Medical manuscripts

KW - Publishing

KW - Retrospective studies

KW - Writing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033584343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033584343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2146/ajhp170183

DO - 10.2146/ajhp170183

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 1853

EP - 1864

JO - American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy

T2 - American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy

JF - American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy

SN - 1079-2082

IS - 22

ER -