A qualitative study of participants' experiences with dietary assessment

Nancy Vuckovic, Cheryl Ritenbaugh, Douglas L Taren, Maribel Tobar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This article reports on the use of focus groups and an experimental participatory activity to investigate factors influencing participants' decisions about what to eat and what to report on food records and food frequency questionnaires. Design: Four focus groups examined participants' experience with diet records and 3 focus groups explored the topic of food portions using a group consensus activity. Twentytwo women participated in the diet record focus groups, and 15 participated in portion estimation groups. Subjects: Focus group participants were equally distributed by age and body mass index values. Each woman completed a 10-day doubly labeled water protocol to measure total energy expenditure, 7 days of diet records (before and during total energy expenditure), and a food frequency questionnaire after the total energy expenditure. Analysis: Transcripts of the focus groups were coded to index categories of responses and to identify themes within and across those responses. Themes discussed in this article are those that were discussed most often and at greatest length by all groups. Results: The diet record focus groups revealed that 2 major factors influenced reporting on diet records: honesty vs social acceptability, and simplifying food intake. The portion estimation focus groups revealed 5 factors that influenced perceptions of portion size: the role of food in the meal, the type of food, personal preferences, product serving sizes, and comparison of personal servings with those of others. Applications: The validity and reliability of self-reported food consumption is greatly influenced by the ways people interpret and respond to dietary assessment instruments. These findings indicate that dietetics professionals need to take extra steps to address issues of accurately recording "bad" foods when training patients to complete diet records. Extra probing is needed when dietary records do not include snacks and include simple meals and a large amount of prepared and packaged food because this may indicate that changes in normal dietary patterns were made in order to more easily complete a dietary record.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1023-1028
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Dietetic Association
Volume100
Issue number9
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Diet Records
focus groups
Focus Groups
Food
diet
energy expenditure
Energy Metabolism
food frequency questionnaires
meals (menu)
Meals
Serving Size
serving size
Portion Size
Food Preferences
portion size
Snacks
Dietetics
food records
snacks
dietetics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A qualitative study of participants' experiences with dietary assessment. / Vuckovic, Nancy; Ritenbaugh, Cheryl; Taren, Douglas L; Tobar, Maribel.

In: Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Vol. 100, No. 9, 2000, p. 1023-1028.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vuckovic, Nancy ; Ritenbaugh, Cheryl ; Taren, Douglas L ; Tobar, Maribel. / A qualitative study of participants' experiences with dietary assessment. In: Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2000 ; Vol. 100, No. 9. pp. 1023-1028.
@article{c01e00eb60d948278dec4011c9534eab,
title = "A qualitative study of participants' experiences with dietary assessment",
abstract = "Objective: This article reports on the use of focus groups and an experimental participatory activity to investigate factors influencing participants' decisions about what to eat and what to report on food records and food frequency questionnaires. Design: Four focus groups examined participants' experience with diet records and 3 focus groups explored the topic of food portions using a group consensus activity. Twentytwo women participated in the diet record focus groups, and 15 participated in portion estimation groups. Subjects: Focus group participants were equally distributed by age and body mass index values. Each woman completed a 10-day doubly labeled water protocol to measure total energy expenditure, 7 days of diet records (before and during total energy expenditure), and a food frequency questionnaire after the total energy expenditure. Analysis: Transcripts of the focus groups were coded to index categories of responses and to identify themes within and across those responses. Themes discussed in this article are those that were discussed most often and at greatest length by all groups. Results: The diet record focus groups revealed that 2 major factors influenced reporting on diet records: honesty vs social acceptability, and simplifying food intake. The portion estimation focus groups revealed 5 factors that influenced perceptions of portion size: the role of food in the meal, the type of food, personal preferences, product serving sizes, and comparison of personal servings with those of others. Applications: The validity and reliability of self-reported food consumption is greatly influenced by the ways people interpret and respond to dietary assessment instruments. These findings indicate that dietetics professionals need to take extra steps to address issues of accurately recording {"}bad{"} foods when training patients to complete diet records. Extra probing is needed when dietary records do not include snacks and include simple meals and a large amount of prepared and packaged food because this may indicate that changes in normal dietary patterns were made in order to more easily complete a dietary record.",
author = "Nancy Vuckovic and Cheryl Ritenbaugh and Taren, {Douglas L} and Maribel Tobar",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "1023--1028",
journal = "Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics",
issn = "2212-2672",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A qualitative study of participants' experiences with dietary assessment

AU - Vuckovic, Nancy

AU - Ritenbaugh, Cheryl

AU - Taren, Douglas L

AU - Tobar, Maribel

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Objective: This article reports on the use of focus groups and an experimental participatory activity to investigate factors influencing participants' decisions about what to eat and what to report on food records and food frequency questionnaires. Design: Four focus groups examined participants' experience with diet records and 3 focus groups explored the topic of food portions using a group consensus activity. Twentytwo women participated in the diet record focus groups, and 15 participated in portion estimation groups. Subjects: Focus group participants were equally distributed by age and body mass index values. Each woman completed a 10-day doubly labeled water protocol to measure total energy expenditure, 7 days of diet records (before and during total energy expenditure), and a food frequency questionnaire after the total energy expenditure. Analysis: Transcripts of the focus groups were coded to index categories of responses and to identify themes within and across those responses. Themes discussed in this article are those that were discussed most often and at greatest length by all groups. Results: The diet record focus groups revealed that 2 major factors influenced reporting on diet records: honesty vs social acceptability, and simplifying food intake. The portion estimation focus groups revealed 5 factors that influenced perceptions of portion size: the role of food in the meal, the type of food, personal preferences, product serving sizes, and comparison of personal servings with those of others. Applications: The validity and reliability of self-reported food consumption is greatly influenced by the ways people interpret and respond to dietary assessment instruments. These findings indicate that dietetics professionals need to take extra steps to address issues of accurately recording "bad" foods when training patients to complete diet records. Extra probing is needed when dietary records do not include snacks and include simple meals and a large amount of prepared and packaged food because this may indicate that changes in normal dietary patterns were made in order to more easily complete a dietary record.

AB - Objective: This article reports on the use of focus groups and an experimental participatory activity to investigate factors influencing participants' decisions about what to eat and what to report on food records and food frequency questionnaires. Design: Four focus groups examined participants' experience with diet records and 3 focus groups explored the topic of food portions using a group consensus activity. Twentytwo women participated in the diet record focus groups, and 15 participated in portion estimation groups. Subjects: Focus group participants were equally distributed by age and body mass index values. Each woman completed a 10-day doubly labeled water protocol to measure total energy expenditure, 7 days of diet records (before and during total energy expenditure), and a food frequency questionnaire after the total energy expenditure. Analysis: Transcripts of the focus groups were coded to index categories of responses and to identify themes within and across those responses. Themes discussed in this article are those that were discussed most often and at greatest length by all groups. Results: The diet record focus groups revealed that 2 major factors influenced reporting on diet records: honesty vs social acceptability, and simplifying food intake. The portion estimation focus groups revealed 5 factors that influenced perceptions of portion size: the role of food in the meal, the type of food, personal preferences, product serving sizes, and comparison of personal servings with those of others. Applications: The validity and reliability of self-reported food consumption is greatly influenced by the ways people interpret and respond to dietary assessment instruments. These findings indicate that dietetics professionals need to take extra steps to address issues of accurately recording "bad" foods when training patients to complete diet records. Extra probing is needed when dietary records do not include snacks and include simple meals and a large amount of prepared and packaged food because this may indicate that changes in normal dietary patterns were made in order to more easily complete a dietary record.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034266966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034266966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11019349

AN - SCOPUS:0034266966

VL - 100

SP - 1023

EP - 1028

JO - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

JF - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

SN - 2212-2672

IS - 9

ER -