A Reaction to Greenwald, Pratkanis, Leippe, and Baumgardner (1986): Under What Conditions Does Research Obstruct Theory Progress?

Jeff L Greenberg, Sheldon Solomon, Tom Pyszczynski, Lynne Steinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Greenwald, Pratkanis, Leippe, and Baumgardner (1986) argued that a theory-testing research orientation contributes to a confirmation bias that impedes the progress of research. To eliminate this confirmation bias, they proposed two complementary result-centered approaches: the method of condition seeking and the design approach. We argue that Greenwald et al. confused the relation between theory and research and that the result-centered strategies they proposed would in no way minimize the bias. We also suggest that result-centered research can impede the progress of psychology because it retards theoretical, methodological, and technological advancement, and encourages increasingly narrow and trivial research endeavors. We conclude by discussing ways to minimize these problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)566-571
Number of pages6
JournalPsychological Review
Volume95
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 1988

Fingerprint

Research
Confirmation Bias
Psychology
Testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

A Reaction to Greenwald, Pratkanis, Leippe, and Baumgardner (1986) : Under What Conditions Does Research Obstruct Theory Progress? / Greenberg, Jeff L; Solomon, Sheldon; Pyszczynski, Tom; Steinberg, Lynne.

In: Psychological Review, Vol. 95, No. 4, 10.1988, p. 566-571.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3e68faa561194c9cae8c7e6b3e294c7e,
title = "A Reaction to Greenwald, Pratkanis, Leippe, and Baumgardner (1986): Under What Conditions Does Research Obstruct Theory Progress?",
abstract = "Greenwald, Pratkanis, Leippe, and Baumgardner (1986) argued that a theory-testing research orientation contributes to a confirmation bias that impedes the progress of research. To eliminate this confirmation bias, they proposed two complementary result-centered approaches: the method of condition seeking and the design approach. We argue that Greenwald et al. confused the relation between theory and research and that the result-centered strategies they proposed would in no way minimize the bias. We also suggest that result-centered research can impede the progress of psychology because it retards theoretical, methodological, and technological advancement, and encourages increasingly narrow and trivial research endeavors. We conclude by discussing ways to minimize these problems.",
author = "Greenberg, {Jeff L} and Sheldon Solomon and Tom Pyszczynski and Lynne Steinberg",
year = "1988",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "566--571",
journal = "Psychological Review",
issn = "0033-295X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Reaction to Greenwald, Pratkanis, Leippe, and Baumgardner (1986)

T2 - Under What Conditions Does Research Obstruct Theory Progress?

AU - Greenberg, Jeff L

AU - Solomon, Sheldon

AU - Pyszczynski, Tom

AU - Steinberg, Lynne

PY - 1988/10

Y1 - 1988/10

N2 - Greenwald, Pratkanis, Leippe, and Baumgardner (1986) argued that a theory-testing research orientation contributes to a confirmation bias that impedes the progress of research. To eliminate this confirmation bias, they proposed two complementary result-centered approaches: the method of condition seeking and the design approach. We argue that Greenwald et al. confused the relation between theory and research and that the result-centered strategies they proposed would in no way minimize the bias. We also suggest that result-centered research can impede the progress of psychology because it retards theoretical, methodological, and technological advancement, and encourages increasingly narrow and trivial research endeavors. We conclude by discussing ways to minimize these problems.

AB - Greenwald, Pratkanis, Leippe, and Baumgardner (1986) argued that a theory-testing research orientation contributes to a confirmation bias that impedes the progress of research. To eliminate this confirmation bias, they proposed two complementary result-centered approaches: the method of condition seeking and the design approach. We argue that Greenwald et al. confused the relation between theory and research and that the result-centered strategies they proposed would in no way minimize the bias. We also suggest that result-centered research can impede the progress of psychology because it retards theoretical, methodological, and technological advancement, and encourages increasingly narrow and trivial research endeavors. We conclude by discussing ways to minimize these problems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141605645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141605645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0141605645

VL - 95

SP - 566

EP - 571

JO - Psychological Review

JF - Psychological Review

SN - 0033-295X

IS - 4

ER -