A Rejection Threshold in Justice Evaluations

Effects on Judgment and Decision-Making

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research examined the process through which justice evaluations are formed. Using image theory's screening process we hypothesized that a rejection threshold exists with regard to violations of just treatment (e.g., laying off an employee without notice). If the number of violations exceeds the decision-maker's threshold, a negative justice evaluation results. Nonviolations (e.g., providing laid-off employees with a generous severance package) were hypothesized to only influence justice evaluations when violations do not exceed the threshold. Three studies compared the impact of justice violations and nonviolations on fairness evaluations. We also examined differences in fairness evaluations operationalized as judgments vs decisions. Results indicated that when makingjudgmentsabout fairness, both violations and nonviolations are equally important. However, when one has todecideon a course of action based on considerations of fairness, nonviolations are only considered if fewer than three violations have been encountered. These results identify important distinctions between judgment and decisions and have implication for research examining outcomes of justice evaluations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-131
Number of pages19
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume76
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Decision Making
Rejection (Psychology)
Judgment and decision making
Violations
Evaluation
Justice
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Fairness
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

A Rejection Threshold in Justice Evaluations : Effects on Judgment and Decision-Making. / Gilliland, Stephen W; Benson, Lehman -; Schepers, Donald H.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 76, No. 2, 11.1998, p. 113-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{484e731a0ad5438180cc8612a807d503,
title = "A Rejection Threshold in Justice Evaluations: Effects on Judgment and Decision-Making",
abstract = "This research examined the process through which justice evaluations are formed. Using image theory's screening process we hypothesized that a rejection threshold exists with regard to violations of just treatment (e.g., laying off an employee without notice). If the number of violations exceeds the decision-maker's threshold, a negative justice evaluation results. Nonviolations (e.g., providing laid-off employees with a generous severance package) were hypothesized to only influence justice evaluations when violations do not exceed the threshold. Three studies compared the impact of justice violations and nonviolations on fairness evaluations. We also examined differences in fairness evaluations operationalized as judgments vs decisions. Results indicated that when makingjudgmentsabout fairness, both violations and nonviolations are equally important. However, when one has todecideon a course of action based on considerations of fairness, nonviolations are only considered if fewer than three violations have been encountered. These results identify important distinctions between judgment and decisions and have implication for research examining outcomes of justice evaluations.",
author = "Gilliland, {Stephen W} and Benson, {Lehman -} and Schepers, {Donald H.}",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1006/obhd.1998.2801",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "113--131",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Rejection Threshold in Justice Evaluations

T2 - Effects on Judgment and Decision-Making

AU - Gilliland, Stephen W

AU - Benson, Lehman -

AU - Schepers, Donald H.

PY - 1998/11

Y1 - 1998/11

N2 - This research examined the process through which justice evaluations are formed. Using image theory's screening process we hypothesized that a rejection threshold exists with regard to violations of just treatment (e.g., laying off an employee without notice). If the number of violations exceeds the decision-maker's threshold, a negative justice evaluation results. Nonviolations (e.g., providing laid-off employees with a generous severance package) were hypothesized to only influence justice evaluations when violations do not exceed the threshold. Three studies compared the impact of justice violations and nonviolations on fairness evaluations. We also examined differences in fairness evaluations operationalized as judgments vs decisions. Results indicated that when makingjudgmentsabout fairness, both violations and nonviolations are equally important. However, when one has todecideon a course of action based on considerations of fairness, nonviolations are only considered if fewer than three violations have been encountered. These results identify important distinctions between judgment and decisions and have implication for research examining outcomes of justice evaluations.

AB - This research examined the process through which justice evaluations are formed. Using image theory's screening process we hypothesized that a rejection threshold exists with regard to violations of just treatment (e.g., laying off an employee without notice). If the number of violations exceeds the decision-maker's threshold, a negative justice evaluation results. Nonviolations (e.g., providing laid-off employees with a generous severance package) were hypothesized to only influence justice evaluations when violations do not exceed the threshold. Three studies compared the impact of justice violations and nonviolations on fairness evaluations. We also examined differences in fairness evaluations operationalized as judgments vs decisions. Results indicated that when makingjudgmentsabout fairness, both violations and nonviolations are equally important. However, when one has todecideon a course of action based on considerations of fairness, nonviolations are only considered if fewer than three violations have been encountered. These results identify important distinctions between judgment and decisions and have implication for research examining outcomes of justice evaluations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007257229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007257229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/obhd.1998.2801

DO - 10.1006/obhd.1998.2801

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 113

EP - 131

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 2

ER -