A reply to Hoschek's criticisms of Ganguly (1968), and Ganguly and Newton (1968) in his article "The stability of staurolite and Chloritoid and their significance in metamorphism of Pelitic Rocks"

Jibamitra Ganguly, G. Hoschek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)166-167
Number of pages2
JournalContributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1971
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

chloritoid
staurolite
newton
metamorphism
Rocks
rocks
rock

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Cite this

@article{0e8d63254ca84886bc64c2bb1690822c,
title = "A reply to Hoschek's criticisms of Ganguly (1968), and Ganguly and Newton (1968) in his article {"}The stability of staurolite and Chloritoid and their significance in metamorphism of Pelitic Rocks{"}",
author = "Jibamitra Ganguly and G. Hoschek",
year = "1971",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/BF00373461",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "166--167",
journal = "Contributions of Mineralogy and Petrology",
issn = "0010-7999",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A reply to Hoschek's criticisms of Ganguly (1968), and Ganguly and Newton (1968) in his article "The stability of staurolite and Chloritoid and their significance in metamorphism of Pelitic Rocks"

AU - Ganguly, Jibamitra

AU - Hoschek, G.

PY - 1971/6

Y1 - 1971/6

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250459700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250459700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00373461

DO - 10.1007/BF00373461

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34250459700

VL - 31

SP - 166

EP - 167

JO - Contributions of Mineralogy and Petrology

JF - Contributions of Mineralogy and Petrology

SN - 0010-7999

IS - 2

ER -