A review of numerical modelling of wave energy converter arrays

Matt Folley, Aurélien Babarit, Ben Child, David Forehand, Louise O'Boyle, Katie Silverthorne, Johannes Spinneken, Vasiliki Stratigaki, Peter A Troch

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Large-scale commercial exploitation of wave energy is certain to require the deployment of wave energy converters (WECs) in arrays, creating 'WEC farms'. An understanding of the hydrodynamic interactions in such arrays is essential for determining optimum layouts of WECs, as well as calculating the area of ocean that the farms will require. It is equally important to consider the potential impact of wave farms on the local and distal wave climates and coastal processes; a poor understanding of the resulting environmental impact may hamper progress, as it would make planning consents more difficult to obtain. It is therefore clear that an understanding the interactions between WECs within a farm is vital for the continued development of the wave energy industry. To support WEC farm design, a range of different numerical models have been developed, with both wave phase-resolving and wave phase-averaging models now available. Phase-resolving methods are primarily based on potential flow models and include semi-analytical techniques, boundary element methods and methods involving the mild-slope equations. Phase-averaging methods are all based around spectral wave models, with supra-grid and sub-grid wave farm models available as alternative implementations. The aims, underlying principles, strengths, weaknesses and obtained results of the main numerical methods currently used for modelling wave energy converter arrays are described in this paper, using a common framework. This allows a qualitative comparative analysis of the different methods to be performed at the end of the paper. This includes consideration of the conditions under which the models may be applied, the output of the models and the relationship between array size and computational effort. Guidance for developers is also presented on the most suitable numerical method to use for given aspects of WEC farm design. For instance, certain models are more suitable for studying near-field effects, whilst others are preferable for investigating far-field effects of the WEC farms. Furthermore, the analysis presented in this paper identifies areas in which the numerical modelling of WEC arrays is relatively weak and thus highlights those in which future developments are required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE
Pages535-546
Number of pages12
Volume7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes
EventASME 2012 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2012 - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Duration: Jul 1 2012Jul 6 2012

Other

OtherASME 2012 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2012
CountryBrazil
CityRio de Janeiro
Period7/1/127/6/12

Fingerprint

Farms
Numerical methods
Potential flow
Boundary element method
Environmental impact
Numerical models
Hydrodynamics
Planning
Industry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ocean Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

Folley, M., Babarit, A., Child, B., Forehand, D., O'Boyle, L., Silverthorne, K., ... Troch, P. A. (2012). A review of numerical modelling of wave energy converter arrays. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE (Vol. 7, pp. 535-546) https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2012-83807

A review of numerical modelling of wave energy converter arrays. / Folley, Matt; Babarit, Aurélien; Child, Ben; Forehand, David; O'Boyle, Louise; Silverthorne, Katie; Spinneken, Johannes; Stratigaki, Vasiliki; Troch, Peter A.

Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE. Vol. 7 2012. p. 535-546.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Folley, M, Babarit, A, Child, B, Forehand, D, O'Boyle, L, Silverthorne, K, Spinneken, J, Stratigaki, V & Troch, PA 2012, A review of numerical modelling of wave energy converter arrays. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE. vol. 7, pp. 535-546, ASME 2012 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2012, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 7/1/12. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2012-83807
Folley M, Babarit A, Child B, Forehand D, O'Boyle L, Silverthorne K et al. A review of numerical modelling of wave energy converter arrays. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE. Vol. 7. 2012. p. 535-546 https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2012-83807
Folley, Matt ; Babarit, Aurélien ; Child, Ben ; Forehand, David ; O'Boyle, Louise ; Silverthorne, Katie ; Spinneken, Johannes ; Stratigaki, Vasiliki ; Troch, Peter A. / A review of numerical modelling of wave energy converter arrays. Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE. Vol. 7 2012. pp. 535-546
@inproceedings{ca338a84b2d64a2f802b113c5704ef0e,
title = "A review of numerical modelling of wave energy converter arrays",
abstract = "Large-scale commercial exploitation of wave energy is certain to require the deployment of wave energy converters (WECs) in arrays, creating 'WEC farms'. An understanding of the hydrodynamic interactions in such arrays is essential for determining optimum layouts of WECs, as well as calculating the area of ocean that the farms will require. It is equally important to consider the potential impact of wave farms on the local and distal wave climates and coastal processes; a poor understanding of the resulting environmental impact may hamper progress, as it would make planning consents more difficult to obtain. It is therefore clear that an understanding the interactions between WECs within a farm is vital for the continued development of the wave energy industry. To support WEC farm design, a range of different numerical models have been developed, with both wave phase-resolving and wave phase-averaging models now available. Phase-resolving methods are primarily based on potential flow models and include semi-analytical techniques, boundary element methods and methods involving the mild-slope equations. Phase-averaging methods are all based around spectral wave models, with supra-grid and sub-grid wave farm models available as alternative implementations. The aims, underlying principles, strengths, weaknesses and obtained results of the main numerical methods currently used for modelling wave energy converter arrays are described in this paper, using a common framework. This allows a qualitative comparative analysis of the different methods to be performed at the end of the paper. This includes consideration of the conditions under which the models may be applied, the output of the models and the relationship between array size and computational effort. Guidance for developers is also presented on the most suitable numerical method to use for given aspects of WEC farm design. For instance, certain models are more suitable for studying near-field effects, whilst others are preferable for investigating far-field effects of the WEC farms. Furthermore, the analysis presented in this paper identifies areas in which the numerical modelling of WEC arrays is relatively weak and thus highlights those in which future developments are required.",
author = "Matt Folley and Aur{\'e}lien Babarit and Ben Child and David Forehand and Louise O'Boyle and Katie Silverthorne and Johannes Spinneken and Vasiliki Stratigaki and Troch, {Peter A}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1115/OMAE2012-83807",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780791844946",
volume = "7",
pages = "535--546",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A review of numerical modelling of wave energy converter arrays

AU - Folley, Matt

AU - Babarit, Aurélien

AU - Child, Ben

AU - Forehand, David

AU - O'Boyle, Louise

AU - Silverthorne, Katie

AU - Spinneken, Johannes

AU - Stratigaki, Vasiliki

AU - Troch, Peter A

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Large-scale commercial exploitation of wave energy is certain to require the deployment of wave energy converters (WECs) in arrays, creating 'WEC farms'. An understanding of the hydrodynamic interactions in such arrays is essential for determining optimum layouts of WECs, as well as calculating the area of ocean that the farms will require. It is equally important to consider the potential impact of wave farms on the local and distal wave climates and coastal processes; a poor understanding of the resulting environmental impact may hamper progress, as it would make planning consents more difficult to obtain. It is therefore clear that an understanding the interactions between WECs within a farm is vital for the continued development of the wave energy industry. To support WEC farm design, a range of different numerical models have been developed, with both wave phase-resolving and wave phase-averaging models now available. Phase-resolving methods are primarily based on potential flow models and include semi-analytical techniques, boundary element methods and methods involving the mild-slope equations. Phase-averaging methods are all based around spectral wave models, with supra-grid and sub-grid wave farm models available as alternative implementations. The aims, underlying principles, strengths, weaknesses and obtained results of the main numerical methods currently used for modelling wave energy converter arrays are described in this paper, using a common framework. This allows a qualitative comparative analysis of the different methods to be performed at the end of the paper. This includes consideration of the conditions under which the models may be applied, the output of the models and the relationship between array size and computational effort. Guidance for developers is also presented on the most suitable numerical method to use for given aspects of WEC farm design. For instance, certain models are more suitable for studying near-field effects, whilst others are preferable for investigating far-field effects of the WEC farms. Furthermore, the analysis presented in this paper identifies areas in which the numerical modelling of WEC arrays is relatively weak and thus highlights those in which future developments are required.

AB - Large-scale commercial exploitation of wave energy is certain to require the deployment of wave energy converters (WECs) in arrays, creating 'WEC farms'. An understanding of the hydrodynamic interactions in such arrays is essential for determining optimum layouts of WECs, as well as calculating the area of ocean that the farms will require. It is equally important to consider the potential impact of wave farms on the local and distal wave climates and coastal processes; a poor understanding of the resulting environmental impact may hamper progress, as it would make planning consents more difficult to obtain. It is therefore clear that an understanding the interactions between WECs within a farm is vital for the continued development of the wave energy industry. To support WEC farm design, a range of different numerical models have been developed, with both wave phase-resolving and wave phase-averaging models now available. Phase-resolving methods are primarily based on potential flow models and include semi-analytical techniques, boundary element methods and methods involving the mild-slope equations. Phase-averaging methods are all based around spectral wave models, with supra-grid and sub-grid wave farm models available as alternative implementations. The aims, underlying principles, strengths, weaknesses and obtained results of the main numerical methods currently used for modelling wave energy converter arrays are described in this paper, using a common framework. This allows a qualitative comparative analysis of the different methods to be performed at the end of the paper. This includes consideration of the conditions under which the models may be applied, the output of the models and the relationship between array size and computational effort. Guidance for developers is also presented on the most suitable numerical method to use for given aspects of WEC farm design. For instance, certain models are more suitable for studying near-field effects, whilst others are preferable for investigating far-field effects of the WEC farms. Furthermore, the analysis presented in this paper identifies areas in which the numerical modelling of WEC arrays is relatively weak and thus highlights those in which future developments are required.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884481413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884481413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/OMAE2012-83807

DO - 10.1115/OMAE2012-83807

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84884481413

SN - 9780791844946

VL - 7

SP - 535

EP - 546

BT - Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE

ER -