A review of the incorporation of complementary and alternative medicine by mainstream physicians

John A. Astin, Ariane Marie, Kenneth R Pelletier, Erik Hansen, William L. Haskell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

302 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Studies suggest that between 30% and 50% of the adult population in industrialized nations use some form of complementary and/or alternative medicine (CAM) to prevent or treat a variety of health-related problems. Method: A comprehensive literature search identified 25 surveys conducted between 1982 and 1995 that examined the practices and beliefs of conventional physicians with regard to 5 of the more prominent CAM therapies: acupuncture, chiropractic, homeopathy, herbal medicine, and massage. Six studies were excluded owing to their methodological limitations. Results: Across surveys, acupuncture had the highest rate of physician referral (43%) among the 5 CAM therapies, followed by chiropractic (40%) and massage (21%). Rates of CAM practice by conventional physicians varied from a low of 9% for homeopathy to a high of 19% for chiropractic and massage therapy. Approximately half of the surveyed physicians believed in the efficacy of acupuncture (51%), chiropractic (53%), and massage (48%), while fewer believed in the value of homeopathy (26%) and herbal approaches (13%). Conclusions: This review suggests that large numbers of physicians are either referring to or practicing some of the more prominent and well-known forms of CAM and that many physicians believe that these therapies are useful or efficacious. These data vary considerably across surveys, most likely because of regional differences and sampling methods, suggesting the need for more rigorous surveys using national, representative samples. Finally, outcomes studies are needed so that physicians can make decisions about the use of CAM based on scientific evidence of efficacy rather than on regional economics and cultural norms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2303-2310
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume158
Issue number21
StatePublished - Nov 23 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Complementary Therapies
Physicians
Chiropractic
Massage
Homeopathy
Acupuncture
Herbal Medicine
Developed Countries
Referral and Consultation
Economics
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

A review of the incorporation of complementary and alternative medicine by mainstream physicians. / Astin, John A.; Marie, Ariane; Pelletier, Kenneth R; Hansen, Erik; Haskell, William L.

In: Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 158, No. 21, 23.11.1998, p. 2303-2310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Astin, John A. ; Marie, Ariane ; Pelletier, Kenneth R ; Hansen, Erik ; Haskell, William L. / A review of the incorporation of complementary and alternative medicine by mainstream physicians. In: Archives of Internal Medicine. 1998 ; Vol. 158, No. 21. pp. 2303-2310.
@article{60ae3103e25c40d8bcf8bc69a502eb80,
title = "A review of the incorporation of complementary and alternative medicine by mainstream physicians",
abstract = "Background: Studies suggest that between 30{\%} and 50{\%} of the adult population in industrialized nations use some form of complementary and/or alternative medicine (CAM) to prevent or treat a variety of health-related problems. Method: A comprehensive literature search identified 25 surveys conducted between 1982 and 1995 that examined the practices and beliefs of conventional physicians with regard to 5 of the more prominent CAM therapies: acupuncture, chiropractic, homeopathy, herbal medicine, and massage. Six studies were excluded owing to their methodological limitations. Results: Across surveys, acupuncture had the highest rate of physician referral (43{\%}) among the 5 CAM therapies, followed by chiropractic (40{\%}) and massage (21{\%}). Rates of CAM practice by conventional physicians varied from a low of 9{\%} for homeopathy to a high of 19{\%} for chiropractic and massage therapy. Approximately half of the surveyed physicians believed in the efficacy of acupuncture (51{\%}), chiropractic (53{\%}), and massage (48{\%}), while fewer believed in the value of homeopathy (26{\%}) and herbal approaches (13{\%}). Conclusions: This review suggests that large numbers of physicians are either referring to or practicing some of the more prominent and well-known forms of CAM and that many physicians believe that these therapies are useful or efficacious. These data vary considerably across surveys, most likely because of regional differences and sampling methods, suggesting the need for more rigorous surveys using national, representative samples. Finally, outcomes studies are needed so that physicians can make decisions about the use of CAM based on scientific evidence of efficacy rather than on regional economics and cultural norms.",
author = "Astin, {John A.} and Ariane Marie and Pelletier, {Kenneth R} and Erik Hansen and Haskell, {William L.}",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
day = "23",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "158",
pages = "2303--2310",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of the incorporation of complementary and alternative medicine by mainstream physicians

AU - Astin, John A.

AU - Marie, Ariane

AU - Pelletier, Kenneth R

AU - Hansen, Erik

AU - Haskell, William L.

PY - 1998/11/23

Y1 - 1998/11/23

N2 - Background: Studies suggest that between 30% and 50% of the adult population in industrialized nations use some form of complementary and/or alternative medicine (CAM) to prevent or treat a variety of health-related problems. Method: A comprehensive literature search identified 25 surveys conducted between 1982 and 1995 that examined the practices and beliefs of conventional physicians with regard to 5 of the more prominent CAM therapies: acupuncture, chiropractic, homeopathy, herbal medicine, and massage. Six studies were excluded owing to their methodological limitations. Results: Across surveys, acupuncture had the highest rate of physician referral (43%) among the 5 CAM therapies, followed by chiropractic (40%) and massage (21%). Rates of CAM practice by conventional physicians varied from a low of 9% for homeopathy to a high of 19% for chiropractic and massage therapy. Approximately half of the surveyed physicians believed in the efficacy of acupuncture (51%), chiropractic (53%), and massage (48%), while fewer believed in the value of homeopathy (26%) and herbal approaches (13%). Conclusions: This review suggests that large numbers of physicians are either referring to or practicing some of the more prominent and well-known forms of CAM and that many physicians believe that these therapies are useful or efficacious. These data vary considerably across surveys, most likely because of regional differences and sampling methods, suggesting the need for more rigorous surveys using national, representative samples. Finally, outcomes studies are needed so that physicians can make decisions about the use of CAM based on scientific evidence of efficacy rather than on regional economics and cultural norms.

AB - Background: Studies suggest that between 30% and 50% of the adult population in industrialized nations use some form of complementary and/or alternative medicine (CAM) to prevent or treat a variety of health-related problems. Method: A comprehensive literature search identified 25 surveys conducted between 1982 and 1995 that examined the practices and beliefs of conventional physicians with regard to 5 of the more prominent CAM therapies: acupuncture, chiropractic, homeopathy, herbal medicine, and massage. Six studies were excluded owing to their methodological limitations. Results: Across surveys, acupuncture had the highest rate of physician referral (43%) among the 5 CAM therapies, followed by chiropractic (40%) and massage (21%). Rates of CAM practice by conventional physicians varied from a low of 9% for homeopathy to a high of 19% for chiropractic and massage therapy. Approximately half of the surveyed physicians believed in the efficacy of acupuncture (51%), chiropractic (53%), and massage (48%), while fewer believed in the value of homeopathy (26%) and herbal approaches (13%). Conclusions: This review suggests that large numbers of physicians are either referring to or practicing some of the more prominent and well-known forms of CAM and that many physicians believe that these therapies are useful or efficacious. These data vary considerably across surveys, most likely because of regional differences and sampling methods, suggesting the need for more rigorous surveys using national, representative samples. Finally, outcomes studies are needed so that physicians can make decisions about the use of CAM based on scientific evidence of efficacy rather than on regional economics and cultural norms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032561674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032561674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9827781

AN - SCOPUS:0032561674

VL - 158

SP - 2303

EP - 2310

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 21

ER -