A Shack-Hartmann-based autorefractor

Jacob L. Beverage, James T Schwiegerling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Autorefractors are typically based on either the optometer or the Scheiner principles, or a combination of the two techniques. These devices have dominated the market for objective assessment of refractive error for >30 years. The purpose of this investigation is to test a Shack-Hartmann-based system as an alternative to these systems. METHODS: Fourteen subjects with varying levels of refractive error were measured with a Topcon autorefractor and a Shack-Hartmann-based autorefractor. Fourier transform techniques were used to extract sphere, cylinder, and axis information from the Shack-Hartrnann images, avoiding the need for image processing. The deviation of the refractive error from a subjective refraction was used as a means of comparing the two devices. RESULTS: The two devices performed similarly on this group of subjects. The mean difference in refraction between the two devices was nearly zero, suggesting that the likelihood and magnitude of errors for the two devices are equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: The Shack-Hartmann-based autoretractor shows promise as an afternative to conventional optometer or Scheiner-based technologies. However, issues with extending the myopic range of the device still need to be resolved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)932-937
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume22
Issue number9
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Equipment and Supplies
Refractive Errors
Fourier Analysis
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

A Shack-Hartmann-based autorefractor. / Beverage, Jacob L.; Schwiegerling, James T.

In: Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 22, No. 9, 11.2006, p. 932-937.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beverage, Jacob L. ; Schwiegerling, James T. / A Shack-Hartmann-based autorefractor. In: Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 22, No. 9. pp. 932-937.
@article{018bba7ea4eb4f6abec6dd6dbedb594a,
title = "A Shack-Hartmann-based autorefractor",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Autorefractors are typically based on either the optometer or the Scheiner principles, or a combination of the two techniques. These devices have dominated the market for objective assessment of refractive error for >30 years. The purpose of this investigation is to test a Shack-Hartmann-based system as an alternative to these systems. METHODS: Fourteen subjects with varying levels of refractive error were measured with a Topcon autorefractor and a Shack-Hartmann-based autorefractor. Fourier transform techniques were used to extract sphere, cylinder, and axis information from the Shack-Hartrnann images, avoiding the need for image processing. The deviation of the refractive error from a subjective refraction was used as a means of comparing the two devices. RESULTS: The two devices performed similarly on this group of subjects. The mean difference in refraction between the two devices was nearly zero, suggesting that the likelihood and magnitude of errors for the two devices are equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: The Shack-Hartmann-based autoretractor shows promise as an afternative to conventional optometer or Scheiner-based technologies. However, issues with extending the myopic range of the device still need to be resolved.",
author = "Beverage, {Jacob L.} and Schwiegerling, {James T}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "932--937",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "1081-597X",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Shack-Hartmann-based autorefractor

AU - Beverage, Jacob L.

AU - Schwiegerling, James T

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - PURPOSE: Autorefractors are typically based on either the optometer or the Scheiner principles, or a combination of the two techniques. These devices have dominated the market for objective assessment of refractive error for >30 years. The purpose of this investigation is to test a Shack-Hartmann-based system as an alternative to these systems. METHODS: Fourteen subjects with varying levels of refractive error were measured with a Topcon autorefractor and a Shack-Hartmann-based autorefractor. Fourier transform techniques were used to extract sphere, cylinder, and axis information from the Shack-Hartrnann images, avoiding the need for image processing. The deviation of the refractive error from a subjective refraction was used as a means of comparing the two devices. RESULTS: The two devices performed similarly on this group of subjects. The mean difference in refraction between the two devices was nearly zero, suggesting that the likelihood and magnitude of errors for the two devices are equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: The Shack-Hartmann-based autoretractor shows promise as an afternative to conventional optometer or Scheiner-based technologies. However, issues with extending the myopic range of the device still need to be resolved.

AB - PURPOSE: Autorefractors are typically based on either the optometer or the Scheiner principles, or a combination of the two techniques. These devices have dominated the market for objective assessment of refractive error for >30 years. The purpose of this investigation is to test a Shack-Hartmann-based system as an alternative to these systems. METHODS: Fourteen subjects with varying levels of refractive error were measured with a Topcon autorefractor and a Shack-Hartmann-based autorefractor. Fourier transform techniques were used to extract sphere, cylinder, and axis information from the Shack-Hartrnann images, avoiding the need for image processing. The deviation of the refractive error from a subjective refraction was used as a means of comparing the two devices. RESULTS: The two devices performed similarly on this group of subjects. The mean difference in refraction between the two devices was nearly zero, suggesting that the likelihood and magnitude of errors for the two devices are equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: The Shack-Hartmann-based autoretractor shows promise as an afternative to conventional optometer or Scheiner-based technologies. However, issues with extending the myopic range of the device still need to be resolved.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751102133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751102133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 932

EP - 937

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 1081-597X

IS - 9

ER -