A single-center analysis of abdominal imaging in the evaluation of kidney transplant recipients

Brenton Winship, Swetha Ramakrishnan, Jonathan Evans, Christina Lurie, Diego R Martin, Thomas Pearson, Nicole Turgeon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many transplantation programs utilize noninvasive abdominal and pelvic imaging in the pre-operative evaluation of recipient candidates. Practice patterns vary, and consensus guidelines addressing the risks and benefits of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the pre-transplant evaluation process do not currently exist. In this single-center study, we examined the frequency, clinical significance, and associated costs of CT and MRI findings during the pre-transplant evaluation of renal transplant recipients. A retrospective chart review of 3041 adult patients who underwent a CT/CTA or MRI/MRA of the abdomen and pelvis for pre-transplant evaluation between 2005 and 2010 was performed. Pre-transplant imaging with MRI offered a more sensitive evaluation in comparison with CT, with the notable exception of abnormalities in which calcium was detected. Patients imaged with CT had a significantly greater proportion of subsequent clinical actions arising from imaging findings. The total financial cost of MRI was greater than that of CT. No cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in patients who received MultiHance gadolinium contrast were reported. In conclusion, the risks, benefits, and costs of CT/CTA and MRI/MRA must be carefully considered to optimize the pre-operative evaluation of renal transplant recipients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)701-709
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Transplantation
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Tomography
Kidney
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Transplants
Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Gadolinium
Transplant Recipients
Pelvis
Abdomen
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Transplantation
Guidelines
Calcium

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • Kidney transplant
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Pre-transplant evaluation
  • Pre-transplant imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Cite this

A single-center analysis of abdominal imaging in the evaluation of kidney transplant recipients. / Winship, Brenton; Ramakrishnan, Swetha; Evans, Jonathan; Lurie, Christina; Martin, Diego R; Pearson, Thomas; Turgeon, Nicole.

In: Clinical Transplantation, Vol. 27, No. 5, 09.2013, p. 701-709.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Winship, B, Ramakrishnan, S, Evans, J, Lurie, C, Martin, DR, Pearson, T & Turgeon, N 2013, 'A single-center analysis of abdominal imaging in the evaluation of kidney transplant recipients', Clinical Transplantation, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 701-709. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12202
Winship, Brenton ; Ramakrishnan, Swetha ; Evans, Jonathan ; Lurie, Christina ; Martin, Diego R ; Pearson, Thomas ; Turgeon, Nicole. / A single-center analysis of abdominal imaging in the evaluation of kidney transplant recipients. In: Clinical Transplantation. 2013 ; Vol. 27, No. 5. pp. 701-709.
@article{0372cbfcb2f141e1a7c12af03a0f5614,
title = "A single-center analysis of abdominal imaging in the evaluation of kidney transplant recipients",
abstract = "Many transplantation programs utilize noninvasive abdominal and pelvic imaging in the pre-operative evaluation of recipient candidates. Practice patterns vary, and consensus guidelines addressing the risks and benefits of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the pre-transplant evaluation process do not currently exist. In this single-center study, we examined the frequency, clinical significance, and associated costs of CT and MRI findings during the pre-transplant evaluation of renal transplant recipients. A retrospective chart review of 3041 adult patients who underwent a CT/CTA or MRI/MRA of the abdomen and pelvis for pre-transplant evaluation between 2005 and 2010 was performed. Pre-transplant imaging with MRI offered a more sensitive evaluation in comparison with CT, with the notable exception of abnormalities in which calcium was detected. Patients imaged with CT had a significantly greater proportion of subsequent clinical actions arising from imaging findings. The total financial cost of MRI was greater than that of CT. No cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in patients who received MultiHance gadolinium contrast were reported. In conclusion, the risks, benefits, and costs of CT/CTA and MRI/MRA must be carefully considered to optimize the pre-operative evaluation of renal transplant recipients.",
keywords = "Computed tomography, Kidney transplant, Magnetic resonance imaging, Pre-transplant evaluation, Pre-transplant imaging",
author = "Brenton Winship and Swetha Ramakrishnan and Jonathan Evans and Christina Lurie and Martin, {Diego R} and Thomas Pearson and Nicole Turgeon",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/ctr.12202",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "701--709",
journal = "Clinical Transplantation",
issn = "0902-0063",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A single-center analysis of abdominal imaging in the evaluation of kidney transplant recipients

AU - Winship, Brenton

AU - Ramakrishnan, Swetha

AU - Evans, Jonathan

AU - Lurie, Christina

AU - Martin, Diego R

AU - Pearson, Thomas

AU - Turgeon, Nicole

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Many transplantation programs utilize noninvasive abdominal and pelvic imaging in the pre-operative evaluation of recipient candidates. Practice patterns vary, and consensus guidelines addressing the risks and benefits of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the pre-transplant evaluation process do not currently exist. In this single-center study, we examined the frequency, clinical significance, and associated costs of CT and MRI findings during the pre-transplant evaluation of renal transplant recipients. A retrospective chart review of 3041 adult patients who underwent a CT/CTA or MRI/MRA of the abdomen and pelvis for pre-transplant evaluation between 2005 and 2010 was performed. Pre-transplant imaging with MRI offered a more sensitive evaluation in comparison with CT, with the notable exception of abnormalities in which calcium was detected. Patients imaged with CT had a significantly greater proportion of subsequent clinical actions arising from imaging findings. The total financial cost of MRI was greater than that of CT. No cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in patients who received MultiHance gadolinium contrast were reported. In conclusion, the risks, benefits, and costs of CT/CTA and MRI/MRA must be carefully considered to optimize the pre-operative evaluation of renal transplant recipients.

AB - Many transplantation programs utilize noninvasive abdominal and pelvic imaging in the pre-operative evaluation of recipient candidates. Practice patterns vary, and consensus guidelines addressing the risks and benefits of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the pre-transplant evaluation process do not currently exist. In this single-center study, we examined the frequency, clinical significance, and associated costs of CT and MRI findings during the pre-transplant evaluation of renal transplant recipients. A retrospective chart review of 3041 adult patients who underwent a CT/CTA or MRI/MRA of the abdomen and pelvis for pre-transplant evaluation between 2005 and 2010 was performed. Pre-transplant imaging with MRI offered a more sensitive evaluation in comparison with CT, with the notable exception of abnormalities in which calcium was detected. Patients imaged with CT had a significantly greater proportion of subsequent clinical actions arising from imaging findings. The total financial cost of MRI was greater than that of CT. No cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in patients who received MultiHance gadolinium contrast were reported. In conclusion, the risks, benefits, and costs of CT/CTA and MRI/MRA must be carefully considered to optimize the pre-operative evaluation of renal transplant recipients.

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Kidney transplant

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Pre-transplant evaluation

KW - Pre-transplant imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884987524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884987524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ctr.12202

DO - 10.1111/ctr.12202

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 701

EP - 709

JO - Clinical Transplantation

JF - Clinical Transplantation

SN - 0902-0063

IS - 5

ER -