A smoking cessation intervention plus proactive quitline referral in the pediatric emergency

Melinda E. Mahabee-Gittens, Judith S Gordon, Matthew E. Krugh, Brian Henry, Anthony C. Leonard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The prevalence of adult tobacco users who utilize the emergency department as patients or parents is disproportionately higher than the national average rates of tobacco use. Thus, it is advised that the emergency department be utilized as a venue for providing tobacco cessation counseling to adult tobacco users. Using a randomized control trial design, this pilot study evaluated the effect of a brief tobacco cessation intervention for tobacco using parents of children brought to a pediatric emergency department. Participants received either usual care or a brief tobacco cessation intervention based on the first 2 of the 5A's of the Clinical Practice Guidelines and fax referral to the Quitline. The primary outcome was self-reported repeated point prevalence of tobacco use at 6 weeks and 3 months following the intervention. Secondary aims included number of quit attempts, increases in readiness to quit, comparisons of participants who were successfully retained, and contact rates by Quitline counselors. At 3-month follow-up, compared to the Usual Care Control group, intervention participants were more likely to have made at least one quit attempt (59% vs. 34%; p<.01), be seriously thinking about quitting (68% vs. 37%; p<.001), and have higher Ladder scores (6.2 vs. 5.3; p<.05). Study personnel were able to contact 68% and 52%, respectively, of participants at 6-week and 3-month follow-up. Quitline counselors were unable to reach 54% of participants. Our results reveal increased intentions to quit and trends toward quitting, however we experienced difficulties with participant retention. Suggestions for improvements in point prevalence and retention are given.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1745-1751
Number of pages7
JournalNicotine and Tobacco Research
Volume10
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tobacco Use Cessation
Smoking Cessation
Tobacco
Hospital Emergency Service
Emergencies
Referral and Consultation
Tobacco Use
Pediatrics
Parents
Telefacsimile
Practice Guidelines
Counseling
Control Groups
Counselors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

A smoking cessation intervention plus proactive quitline referral in the pediatric emergency. / Mahabee-Gittens, Melinda E.; Gordon, Judith S; Krugh, Matthew E.; Henry, Brian; Leonard, Anthony C.

In: Nicotine and Tobacco Research, Vol. 10, No. 12, 2008, p. 1745-1751.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mahabee-Gittens, Melinda E. ; Gordon, Judith S ; Krugh, Matthew E. ; Henry, Brian ; Leonard, Anthony C. / A smoking cessation intervention plus proactive quitline referral in the pediatric emergency. In: Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2008 ; Vol. 10, No. 12. pp. 1745-1751.
@article{1a3bfbcc310d48b4ad4a9a3ee021d52a,
title = "A smoking cessation intervention plus proactive quitline referral in the pediatric emergency",
abstract = "The prevalence of adult tobacco users who utilize the emergency department as patients or parents is disproportionately higher than the national average rates of tobacco use. Thus, it is advised that the emergency department be utilized as a venue for providing tobacco cessation counseling to adult tobacco users. Using a randomized control trial design, this pilot study evaluated the effect of a brief tobacco cessation intervention for tobacco using parents of children brought to a pediatric emergency department. Participants received either usual care or a brief tobacco cessation intervention based on the first 2 of the 5A's of the Clinical Practice Guidelines and fax referral to the Quitline. The primary outcome was self-reported repeated point prevalence of tobacco use at 6 weeks and 3 months following the intervention. Secondary aims included number of quit attempts, increases in readiness to quit, comparisons of participants who were successfully retained, and contact rates by Quitline counselors. At 3-month follow-up, compared to the Usual Care Control group, intervention participants were more likely to have made at least one quit attempt (59{\%} vs. 34{\%}; p<.01), be seriously thinking about quitting (68{\%} vs. 37{\%}; p<.001), and have higher Ladder scores (6.2 vs. 5.3; p<.05). Study personnel were able to contact 68{\%} and 52{\%}, respectively, of participants at 6-week and 3-month follow-up. Quitline counselors were unable to reach 54{\%} of participants. Our results reveal increased intentions to quit and trends toward quitting, however we experienced difficulties with participant retention. Suggestions for improvements in point prevalence and retention are given.",
author = "Mahabee-Gittens, {Melinda E.} and Gordon, {Judith S} and Krugh, {Matthew E.} and Brian Henry and Leonard, {Anthony C.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/14622200802443494",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "1745--1751",
journal = "Nicotine and Tobacco Research",
issn = "1462-2203",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A smoking cessation intervention plus proactive quitline referral in the pediatric emergency

AU - Mahabee-Gittens, Melinda E.

AU - Gordon, Judith S

AU - Krugh, Matthew E.

AU - Henry, Brian

AU - Leonard, Anthony C.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The prevalence of adult tobacco users who utilize the emergency department as patients or parents is disproportionately higher than the national average rates of tobacco use. Thus, it is advised that the emergency department be utilized as a venue for providing tobacco cessation counseling to adult tobacco users. Using a randomized control trial design, this pilot study evaluated the effect of a brief tobacco cessation intervention for tobacco using parents of children brought to a pediatric emergency department. Participants received either usual care or a brief tobacco cessation intervention based on the first 2 of the 5A's of the Clinical Practice Guidelines and fax referral to the Quitline. The primary outcome was self-reported repeated point prevalence of tobacco use at 6 weeks and 3 months following the intervention. Secondary aims included number of quit attempts, increases in readiness to quit, comparisons of participants who were successfully retained, and contact rates by Quitline counselors. At 3-month follow-up, compared to the Usual Care Control group, intervention participants were more likely to have made at least one quit attempt (59% vs. 34%; p<.01), be seriously thinking about quitting (68% vs. 37%; p<.001), and have higher Ladder scores (6.2 vs. 5.3; p<.05). Study personnel were able to contact 68% and 52%, respectively, of participants at 6-week and 3-month follow-up. Quitline counselors were unable to reach 54% of participants. Our results reveal increased intentions to quit and trends toward quitting, however we experienced difficulties with participant retention. Suggestions for improvements in point prevalence and retention are given.

AB - The prevalence of adult tobacco users who utilize the emergency department as patients or parents is disproportionately higher than the national average rates of tobacco use. Thus, it is advised that the emergency department be utilized as a venue for providing tobacco cessation counseling to adult tobacco users. Using a randomized control trial design, this pilot study evaluated the effect of a brief tobacco cessation intervention for tobacco using parents of children brought to a pediatric emergency department. Participants received either usual care or a brief tobacco cessation intervention based on the first 2 of the 5A's of the Clinical Practice Guidelines and fax referral to the Quitline. The primary outcome was self-reported repeated point prevalence of tobacco use at 6 weeks and 3 months following the intervention. Secondary aims included number of quit attempts, increases in readiness to quit, comparisons of participants who were successfully retained, and contact rates by Quitline counselors. At 3-month follow-up, compared to the Usual Care Control group, intervention participants were more likely to have made at least one quit attempt (59% vs. 34%; p<.01), be seriously thinking about quitting (68% vs. 37%; p<.001), and have higher Ladder scores (6.2 vs. 5.3; p<.05). Study personnel were able to contact 68% and 52%, respectively, of participants at 6-week and 3-month follow-up. Quitline counselors were unable to reach 54% of participants. Our results reveal increased intentions to quit and trends toward quitting, however we experienced difficulties with participant retention. Suggestions for improvements in point prevalence and retention are given.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57049116980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57049116980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14622200802443494

DO - 10.1080/14622200802443494

M3 - Article

C2 - 19023825

AN - SCOPUS:57049116980

VL - 10

SP - 1745

EP - 1751

JO - Nicotine and Tobacco Research

JF - Nicotine and Tobacco Research

SN - 1462-2203

IS - 12

ER -