A species-level model for metabolic scaling in trees I. Exploring boundaries to scaling space within and across species

John S. Sperry, Duncan D. Smith, Van M. Savage, Brian Enquist, Katherine A. McCulloh, Peter B. Reich, Lisa P. Bentley, Erica I. von Allmen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Metabolic scaling theory predicts how tree water flow rate (Q) scales with tree mass (M) and assumes identical scaling for biomass growth rate (G) with M. Analytic models have derived general scaling expectations from proposed optima in the rate of axial xylem conduit taper (taper function) and the allocation of wood space to water conduction (packing function). Recent predictions suggest G and Q scale with M to the ≈ 0·7 power with 0·75 as an upper bound. We complement this a priori optimization approach with a numerical model that incorporates species-specific taper and packing functions, plus additional empirical inputs essential for predicting Q (effects of gravity, tree size, heartwood, bark, and hydraulic resistance of leaf, root and interconduit pits). Traits are analysed individually, and in ensemble across tree types, to define a 2D 'scaling space' of absolute Q vs. its scaling exponent with tree size. ll traits influenced Q and many affected its scaling with M. Constraints driving the optimization of taper or packing functions, or any other trait, can be relaxed via compensatory changes in other traits. The scaling space of temperate trees overlapped despite diverse anatomy and winter-adaptive strategies. More conducting space in conifer wood compensated for narrow tracheids; extensive sapwood in diffuse-porous trees compensated for narrow vessels; and limited sapwood in ring-porous trees negated the effect of large vessels. Tropical trees, however, achieved the greatest Q and steepest size-scaling by pairing large vessels with extensive sapwood, a combination compatible with minimal water stress and no freezing-stress. Intraspecific scaling across all types averaged Q ∝ M 0·63 (maximum = Q ∝ M 0·71) for size-invariant root-shoot ratio. Scaling reached Q ∝ M 0·75 only if conductance increased faster in roots than in shoots with size. Interspecific scaling could reach Q ∝ M 0·75, but this may require the evolution of size-biased allometries rather than arising directly from biophysical constraints. Our species-level model is more realistic than its analytical predecessors and provides a tool for interpreting the adaptive significance of functional trait diversification in relation to whole-tree water use and consequent metabolic scaling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1054-1065
Number of pages12
JournalFunctional Ecology
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

xylem vessels
sapwood
vessel
tracheids
root-shoot ratio
allometry
heartwood
xylem
root shoot ratio
water stress
gravity
anatomy
bark
water flow
conifers
water use
coniferous tree
freezing
complement
fluid mechanics

Keywords

  • Ecological wood anatomy
  • Functional tree types
  • Hydraulic architecture
  • Metabolic scaling theory
  • Plant allometry
  • Tree water transport
  • Vascular network theory
  • West Brown and Enquist

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

A species-level model for metabolic scaling in trees I. Exploring boundaries to scaling space within and across species. / Sperry, John S.; Smith, Duncan D.; Savage, Van M.; Enquist, Brian; McCulloh, Katherine A.; Reich, Peter B.; Bentley, Lisa P.; von Allmen, Erica I.

In: Functional Ecology, Vol. 26, No. 5, 10.2012, p. 1054-1065.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sperry, JS, Smith, DD, Savage, VM, Enquist, B, McCulloh, KA, Reich, PB, Bentley, LP & von Allmen, EI 2012, 'A species-level model for metabolic scaling in trees I. Exploring boundaries to scaling space within and across species', Functional Ecology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1054-1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02022.x
Sperry, John S. ; Smith, Duncan D. ; Savage, Van M. ; Enquist, Brian ; McCulloh, Katherine A. ; Reich, Peter B. ; Bentley, Lisa P. ; von Allmen, Erica I. / A species-level model for metabolic scaling in trees I. Exploring boundaries to scaling space within and across species. In: Functional Ecology. 2012 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 1054-1065.
@article{4864f5b2d2714eb0ab8a6d5226e0c978,
title = "A species-level model for metabolic scaling in trees I. Exploring boundaries to scaling space within and across species",
abstract = "Metabolic scaling theory predicts how tree water flow rate (Q) scales with tree mass (M) and assumes identical scaling for biomass growth rate (G) with M. Analytic models have derived general scaling expectations from proposed optima in the rate of axial xylem conduit taper (taper function) and the allocation of wood space to water conduction (packing function). Recent predictions suggest G and Q scale with M to the ≈ 0·7 power with 0·75 as an upper bound. We complement this a priori optimization approach with a numerical model that incorporates species-specific taper and packing functions, plus additional empirical inputs essential for predicting Q (effects of gravity, tree size, heartwood, bark, and hydraulic resistance of leaf, root and interconduit pits). Traits are analysed individually, and in ensemble across tree types, to define a 2D 'scaling space' of absolute Q vs. its scaling exponent with tree size. ll traits influenced Q and many affected its scaling with M. Constraints driving the optimization of taper or packing functions, or any other trait, can be relaxed via compensatory changes in other traits. The scaling space of temperate trees overlapped despite diverse anatomy and winter-adaptive strategies. More conducting space in conifer wood compensated for narrow tracheids; extensive sapwood in diffuse-porous trees compensated for narrow vessels; and limited sapwood in ring-porous trees negated the effect of large vessels. Tropical trees, however, achieved the greatest Q and steepest size-scaling by pairing large vessels with extensive sapwood, a combination compatible with minimal water stress and no freezing-stress. Intraspecific scaling across all types averaged Q ∝ M 0·63 (maximum = Q ∝ M 0·71) for size-invariant root-shoot ratio. Scaling reached Q ∝ M 0·75 only if conductance increased faster in roots than in shoots with size. Interspecific scaling could reach Q ∝ M 0·75, but this may require the evolution of size-biased allometries rather than arising directly from biophysical constraints. Our species-level model is more realistic than its analytical predecessors and provides a tool for interpreting the adaptive significance of functional trait diversification in relation to whole-tree water use and consequent metabolic scaling.",
keywords = "Ecological wood anatomy, Functional tree types, Hydraulic architecture, Metabolic scaling theory, Plant allometry, Tree water transport, Vascular network theory, West Brown and Enquist",
author = "Sperry, {John S.} and Smith, {Duncan D.} and Savage, {Van M.} and Brian Enquist and McCulloh, {Katherine A.} and Reich, {Peter B.} and Bentley, {Lisa P.} and {von Allmen}, {Erica I.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02022.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1054--1065",
journal = "Functional Ecology",
issn = "0269-8463",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A species-level model for metabolic scaling in trees I. Exploring boundaries to scaling space within and across species

AU - Sperry, John S.

AU - Smith, Duncan D.

AU - Savage, Van M.

AU - Enquist, Brian

AU - McCulloh, Katherine A.

AU - Reich, Peter B.

AU - Bentley, Lisa P.

AU - von Allmen, Erica I.

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Metabolic scaling theory predicts how tree water flow rate (Q) scales with tree mass (M) and assumes identical scaling for biomass growth rate (G) with M. Analytic models have derived general scaling expectations from proposed optima in the rate of axial xylem conduit taper (taper function) and the allocation of wood space to water conduction (packing function). Recent predictions suggest G and Q scale with M to the ≈ 0·7 power with 0·75 as an upper bound. We complement this a priori optimization approach with a numerical model that incorporates species-specific taper and packing functions, plus additional empirical inputs essential for predicting Q (effects of gravity, tree size, heartwood, bark, and hydraulic resistance of leaf, root and interconduit pits). Traits are analysed individually, and in ensemble across tree types, to define a 2D 'scaling space' of absolute Q vs. its scaling exponent with tree size. ll traits influenced Q and many affected its scaling with M. Constraints driving the optimization of taper or packing functions, or any other trait, can be relaxed via compensatory changes in other traits. The scaling space of temperate trees overlapped despite diverse anatomy and winter-adaptive strategies. More conducting space in conifer wood compensated for narrow tracheids; extensive sapwood in diffuse-porous trees compensated for narrow vessels; and limited sapwood in ring-porous trees negated the effect of large vessels. Tropical trees, however, achieved the greatest Q and steepest size-scaling by pairing large vessels with extensive sapwood, a combination compatible with minimal water stress and no freezing-stress. Intraspecific scaling across all types averaged Q ∝ M 0·63 (maximum = Q ∝ M 0·71) for size-invariant root-shoot ratio. Scaling reached Q ∝ M 0·75 only if conductance increased faster in roots than in shoots with size. Interspecific scaling could reach Q ∝ M 0·75, but this may require the evolution of size-biased allometries rather than arising directly from biophysical constraints. Our species-level model is more realistic than its analytical predecessors and provides a tool for interpreting the adaptive significance of functional trait diversification in relation to whole-tree water use and consequent metabolic scaling.

AB - Metabolic scaling theory predicts how tree water flow rate (Q) scales with tree mass (M) and assumes identical scaling for biomass growth rate (G) with M. Analytic models have derived general scaling expectations from proposed optima in the rate of axial xylem conduit taper (taper function) and the allocation of wood space to water conduction (packing function). Recent predictions suggest G and Q scale with M to the ≈ 0·7 power with 0·75 as an upper bound. We complement this a priori optimization approach with a numerical model that incorporates species-specific taper and packing functions, plus additional empirical inputs essential for predicting Q (effects of gravity, tree size, heartwood, bark, and hydraulic resistance of leaf, root and interconduit pits). Traits are analysed individually, and in ensemble across tree types, to define a 2D 'scaling space' of absolute Q vs. its scaling exponent with tree size. ll traits influenced Q and many affected its scaling with M. Constraints driving the optimization of taper or packing functions, or any other trait, can be relaxed via compensatory changes in other traits. The scaling space of temperate trees overlapped despite diverse anatomy and winter-adaptive strategies. More conducting space in conifer wood compensated for narrow tracheids; extensive sapwood in diffuse-porous trees compensated for narrow vessels; and limited sapwood in ring-porous trees negated the effect of large vessels. Tropical trees, however, achieved the greatest Q and steepest size-scaling by pairing large vessels with extensive sapwood, a combination compatible with minimal water stress and no freezing-stress. Intraspecific scaling across all types averaged Q ∝ M 0·63 (maximum = Q ∝ M 0·71) for size-invariant root-shoot ratio. Scaling reached Q ∝ M 0·75 only if conductance increased faster in roots than in shoots with size. Interspecific scaling could reach Q ∝ M 0·75, but this may require the evolution of size-biased allometries rather than arising directly from biophysical constraints. Our species-level model is more realistic than its analytical predecessors and provides a tool for interpreting the adaptive significance of functional trait diversification in relation to whole-tree water use and consequent metabolic scaling.

KW - Ecological wood anatomy

KW - Functional tree types

KW - Hydraulic architecture

KW - Metabolic scaling theory

KW - Plant allometry

KW - Tree water transport

KW - Vascular network theory

KW - West Brown and Enquist

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866880212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866880212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02022.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02022.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84866880212

VL - 26

SP - 1054

EP - 1065

JO - Functional Ecology

JF - Functional Ecology

SN - 0269-8463

IS - 5

ER -