A Spectroscopic Survey of the Fields of 28 Strong Gravitational Lenses: Implications for H 0

Michelle L. Wilson, Ann I Zabludoff, Charles R. Keeton, Kenneth C. Wong, Kurtis A. Williams, K. Decker French, Ivelina G. Momcheva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Strong gravitational lensing provides an independent measurement of the Hubble parameter (H 0). One remaining systematic is a bias from the additional mass due to a galaxy group at the lens redshift or along the sightline. We quantify this bias for more than 20 strong lenses that have well-sampled sightline mass distributions, focusing on the convergence κ and shear γ. In 23% of these fields, a lens group contributes ≥1% convergence bias; in 57%, there is a similarly significant line-of-sight group. For the nine time-delay lens systems, H 0 is overestimated by % on average when groups are ignored. In 67% of fields with total , line-of-sight groups contribute more convergence than do lens groups, indicating that the lens group is not the only important mass. Lens environment affects the ratio of four (quad) to two (double) image systems; all seven quads have lens groups while only 3 of 10 doubles do, and the highest convergences due to lens groups are in quads. We calibrate the γ-κ relation: log(κtot) =(194 ±0.34)log (γtot)+(1.31 ±0.49) with an rms scatter of 0.34 dex. Although shear can be measured directly from lensed images, unlike convergence, it can be a poor predictor of convergence; for 19% of our fields, κ is ≥2γ. Thus, accurate cosmology using strong gravitational lenses requires precise measurement and correction for all significant structures in each lens field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number94
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume850
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 20 2017

Fingerprint

gravitational lenses
lenses
line of sight
cosmology
shear
galactic clusters
mass distribution
time lag

Keywords

  • galaxies: groups: general
  • gravitational lensing: strong

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Wilson, M. L., Zabludoff, A. I., Keeton, C. R., Wong, K. C., Williams, K. A., French, K. D., & Momcheva, I. G. (2017). A Spectroscopic Survey of the Fields of 28 Strong Gravitational Lenses: Implications for H 0. Astrophysical Journal, 850(1), [94]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa9653

A Spectroscopic Survey of the Fields of 28 Strong Gravitational Lenses : Implications for H 0. / Wilson, Michelle L.; Zabludoff, Ann I; Keeton, Charles R.; Wong, Kenneth C.; Williams, Kurtis A.; French, K. Decker; Momcheva, Ivelina G.

In: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 850, No. 1, 94, 20.11.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wilson, Michelle L. ; Zabludoff, Ann I ; Keeton, Charles R. ; Wong, Kenneth C. ; Williams, Kurtis A. ; French, K. Decker ; Momcheva, Ivelina G. / A Spectroscopic Survey of the Fields of 28 Strong Gravitational Lenses : Implications for H 0. In: Astrophysical Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 850, No. 1.
@article{c9a0477a79724ec2a5c499de2c2f6adf,
title = "A Spectroscopic Survey of the Fields of 28 Strong Gravitational Lenses: Implications for H 0",
abstract = "Strong gravitational lensing provides an independent measurement of the Hubble parameter (H 0). One remaining systematic is a bias from the additional mass due to a galaxy group at the lens redshift or along the sightline. We quantify this bias for more than 20 strong lenses that have well-sampled sightline mass distributions, focusing on the convergence κ and shear γ. In 23{\%} of these fields, a lens group contributes ≥1{\%} convergence bias; in 57{\%}, there is a similarly significant line-of-sight group. For the nine time-delay lens systems, H 0 is overestimated by {\%} on average when groups are ignored. In 67{\%} of fields with total , line-of-sight groups contribute more convergence than do lens groups, indicating that the lens group is not the only important mass. Lens environment affects the ratio of four (quad) to two (double) image systems; all seven quads have lens groups while only 3 of 10 doubles do, and the highest convergences due to lens groups are in quads. We calibrate the γ-κ relation: log(κtot) =(194 ±0.34)log (γtot)+(1.31 ±0.49) with an rms scatter of 0.34 dex. Although shear can be measured directly from lensed images, unlike convergence, it can be a poor predictor of convergence; for 19{\%} of our fields, κ is ≥2γ. Thus, accurate cosmology using strong gravitational lenses requires precise measurement and correction for all significant structures in each lens field.",
keywords = "galaxies: groups: general, gravitational lensing: strong",
author = "Wilson, {Michelle L.} and Zabludoff, {Ann I} and Keeton, {Charles R.} and Wong, {Kenneth C.} and Williams, {Kurtis A.} and French, {K. Decker} and Momcheva, {Ivelina G.}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "20",
doi = "10.3847/1538-4357/aa9653",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "850",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Spectroscopic Survey of the Fields of 28 Strong Gravitational Lenses

T2 - Implications for H 0

AU - Wilson, Michelle L.

AU - Zabludoff, Ann I

AU - Keeton, Charles R.

AU - Wong, Kenneth C.

AU - Williams, Kurtis A.

AU - French, K. Decker

AU - Momcheva, Ivelina G.

PY - 2017/11/20

Y1 - 2017/11/20

N2 - Strong gravitational lensing provides an independent measurement of the Hubble parameter (H 0). One remaining systematic is a bias from the additional mass due to a galaxy group at the lens redshift or along the sightline. We quantify this bias for more than 20 strong lenses that have well-sampled sightline mass distributions, focusing on the convergence κ and shear γ. In 23% of these fields, a lens group contributes ≥1% convergence bias; in 57%, there is a similarly significant line-of-sight group. For the nine time-delay lens systems, H 0 is overestimated by % on average when groups are ignored. In 67% of fields with total , line-of-sight groups contribute more convergence than do lens groups, indicating that the lens group is not the only important mass. Lens environment affects the ratio of four (quad) to two (double) image systems; all seven quads have lens groups while only 3 of 10 doubles do, and the highest convergences due to lens groups are in quads. We calibrate the γ-κ relation: log(κtot) =(194 ±0.34)log (γtot)+(1.31 ±0.49) with an rms scatter of 0.34 dex. Although shear can be measured directly from lensed images, unlike convergence, it can be a poor predictor of convergence; for 19% of our fields, κ is ≥2γ. Thus, accurate cosmology using strong gravitational lenses requires precise measurement and correction for all significant structures in each lens field.

AB - Strong gravitational lensing provides an independent measurement of the Hubble parameter (H 0). One remaining systematic is a bias from the additional mass due to a galaxy group at the lens redshift or along the sightline. We quantify this bias for more than 20 strong lenses that have well-sampled sightline mass distributions, focusing on the convergence κ and shear γ. In 23% of these fields, a lens group contributes ≥1% convergence bias; in 57%, there is a similarly significant line-of-sight group. For the nine time-delay lens systems, H 0 is overestimated by % on average when groups are ignored. In 67% of fields with total , line-of-sight groups contribute more convergence than do lens groups, indicating that the lens group is not the only important mass. Lens environment affects the ratio of four (quad) to two (double) image systems; all seven quads have lens groups while only 3 of 10 doubles do, and the highest convergences due to lens groups are in quads. We calibrate the γ-κ relation: log(κtot) =(194 ±0.34)log (γtot)+(1.31 ±0.49) with an rms scatter of 0.34 dex. Although shear can be measured directly from lensed images, unlike convergence, it can be a poor predictor of convergence; for 19% of our fields, κ is ≥2γ. Thus, accurate cosmology using strong gravitational lenses requires precise measurement and correction for all significant structures in each lens field.

KW - galaxies: groups: general

KW - gravitational lensing: strong

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037716675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037716675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9653

DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9653

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85037716675

VL - 850

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 1

M1 - 94

ER -