A surfeit of cycles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Chaotic sets are organized about "skeletons" of periodic orbits in the sense that every point on a chaotic set is arbitrarily close to such an orbit. The orbits have the stability property of saddles: attracting in some directions; repelling in others. This topology has implications for changing climates that evidence pronounced variability on time scales ranging from decades to tens of thousands of years. Among these implications are the following: 1. A wide range of periodicities should be (and are) observed. 2. Periodicities should (and do) shift - often abruptly - as the evolving climatic trajectory sequentially shadows first one periodic orbit and then another. 3. Models that have been "tuned" (parametric adjustment) to fit trajectorial evolution in the vicinity of one periodic orbit are likely to fail when the real system moves to another region of the phase space. 4. In response to secular forcing, chaotic sets simplify via the elimination of periodic orbits. If one accepts the reality of anthropogenic warming, the long-term prediction is loss of intrinsic variability. 5. In response to periodic forcing, nonlinear systems can manifest subharmonic resonance i.e., "cyclic" behavior with periods and rotation numbers rationally related to the period of the forcing. Such cycling has been implicated in millennial and stadial variations in paleoclimatic time series. 6. Generically, the dynamics of system observables, such as climate sensitivity, are qualitatively equivalent to those of the whole. If the climate is chaotic, so too is sensitivity. These considerations receive minimal attention in consensus views of climate change that emphasize essentially one-to-one correspondence between global temperatures and exogenous forcing. Caveat emptor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)985-996
Number of pages12
JournalEnergy and Environment
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Orbits
Climate change
Nonlinear systems
Time series
Trajectories
Topology
Temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Energy (miscellaneous)
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

A surfeit of cycles. / Schaffer, William M.

In: Energy and Environment, Vol. 20, No. 6, 10.2009, p. 985-996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schaffer, William M. / A surfeit of cycles. In: Energy and Environment. 2009 ; Vol. 20, No. 6. pp. 985-996.
@article{14e54b0454044662882154f7297b671a,
title = "A surfeit of cycles",
abstract = "Chaotic sets are organized about {"}skeletons{"} of periodic orbits in the sense that every point on a chaotic set is arbitrarily close to such an orbit. The orbits have the stability property of saddles: attracting in some directions; repelling in others. This topology has implications for changing climates that evidence pronounced variability on time scales ranging from decades to tens of thousands of years. Among these implications are the following: 1. A wide range of periodicities should be (and are) observed. 2. Periodicities should (and do) shift - often abruptly - as the evolving climatic trajectory sequentially shadows first one periodic orbit and then another. 3. Models that have been {"}tuned{"} (parametric adjustment) to fit trajectorial evolution in the vicinity of one periodic orbit are likely to fail when the real system moves to another region of the phase space. 4. In response to secular forcing, chaotic sets simplify via the elimination of periodic orbits. If one accepts the reality of anthropogenic warming, the long-term prediction is loss of intrinsic variability. 5. In response to periodic forcing, nonlinear systems can manifest subharmonic resonance i.e., {"}cyclic{"} behavior with periods and rotation numbers rationally related to the period of the forcing. Such cycling has been implicated in millennial and stadial variations in paleoclimatic time series. 6. Generically, the dynamics of system observables, such as climate sensitivity, are qualitatively equivalent to those of the whole. If the climate is chaotic, so too is sensitivity. These considerations receive minimal attention in consensus views of climate change that emphasize essentially one-to-one correspondence between global temperatures and exogenous forcing. Caveat emptor.",
author = "Schaffer, {William M}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1260/095830509789625400",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "985--996",
journal = "Energy and Environment",
issn = "0958-305X",
publisher = "Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A surfeit of cycles

AU - Schaffer, William M

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Chaotic sets are organized about "skeletons" of periodic orbits in the sense that every point on a chaotic set is arbitrarily close to such an orbit. The orbits have the stability property of saddles: attracting in some directions; repelling in others. This topology has implications for changing climates that evidence pronounced variability on time scales ranging from decades to tens of thousands of years. Among these implications are the following: 1. A wide range of periodicities should be (and are) observed. 2. Periodicities should (and do) shift - often abruptly - as the evolving climatic trajectory sequentially shadows first one periodic orbit and then another. 3. Models that have been "tuned" (parametric adjustment) to fit trajectorial evolution in the vicinity of one periodic orbit are likely to fail when the real system moves to another region of the phase space. 4. In response to secular forcing, chaotic sets simplify via the elimination of periodic orbits. If one accepts the reality of anthropogenic warming, the long-term prediction is loss of intrinsic variability. 5. In response to periodic forcing, nonlinear systems can manifest subharmonic resonance i.e., "cyclic" behavior with periods and rotation numbers rationally related to the period of the forcing. Such cycling has been implicated in millennial and stadial variations in paleoclimatic time series. 6. Generically, the dynamics of system observables, such as climate sensitivity, are qualitatively equivalent to those of the whole. If the climate is chaotic, so too is sensitivity. These considerations receive minimal attention in consensus views of climate change that emphasize essentially one-to-one correspondence between global temperatures and exogenous forcing. Caveat emptor.

AB - Chaotic sets are organized about "skeletons" of periodic orbits in the sense that every point on a chaotic set is arbitrarily close to such an orbit. The orbits have the stability property of saddles: attracting in some directions; repelling in others. This topology has implications for changing climates that evidence pronounced variability on time scales ranging from decades to tens of thousands of years. Among these implications are the following: 1. A wide range of periodicities should be (and are) observed. 2. Periodicities should (and do) shift - often abruptly - as the evolving climatic trajectory sequentially shadows first one periodic orbit and then another. 3. Models that have been "tuned" (parametric adjustment) to fit trajectorial evolution in the vicinity of one periodic orbit are likely to fail when the real system moves to another region of the phase space. 4. In response to secular forcing, chaotic sets simplify via the elimination of periodic orbits. If one accepts the reality of anthropogenic warming, the long-term prediction is loss of intrinsic variability. 5. In response to periodic forcing, nonlinear systems can manifest subharmonic resonance i.e., "cyclic" behavior with periods and rotation numbers rationally related to the period of the forcing. Such cycling has been implicated in millennial and stadial variations in paleoclimatic time series. 6. Generically, the dynamics of system observables, such as climate sensitivity, are qualitatively equivalent to those of the whole. If the climate is chaotic, so too is sensitivity. These considerations receive minimal attention in consensus views of climate change that emphasize essentially one-to-one correspondence between global temperatures and exogenous forcing. Caveat emptor.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350271482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350271482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1260/095830509789625400

DO - 10.1260/095830509789625400

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 985

EP - 996

JO - Energy and Environment

JF - Energy and Environment

SN - 0958-305X

IS - 6

ER -