A tale of two rivers: Pathways for improving water management in the Jordan and Colorado River basins

Assaf Chen, Adam Abramson, Nir Becker, Sharon B Megdal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper considers two river systems that have been subject to significant development during the last 60 years: the Jordan River in the Middle East and the Colorado River in the western United States. Both play major roles in serving the demands of growing populations, and climate change models predict both semi-arid to arid regions to become hotter and/or drier in the future. The Jordan River basin, shared by five nations, is already experiencing a critical level of environmental damage. Its lower stretch is practically a sewage canal with less than 10% of its natural base-flow. Due to its unique historical, religious and environmental role, restoration efforts have gained momentum and wide public support. In the Colorado River Basin, water law is characterized by the "Law of the River" and water use is managed through regional allocation constraints. The Colorado River, shared by seven U.S. states and Mexico, is highly managed and over-allocated. Shortage declarations have serious implications for low priority users, with the Central Arizona Project being among the lowest. This makes large population centers and agricultural users vulnerable to curtailment of deliveries. We argue that there are common factors with respect to the policy and management options of these two basins that may provide insights into the similarities and divergences of their respective future pathways. These factors are: regional water supply and demand pressures, water governance, transboundary issues and demand for environmental flows. With a particular focus on the Israel and Arizona portions of these respective river basins, we address synergies and tradeoffs between groundwater and surface water usage, sectoral allocation strategies, public vs. private water ownership and legality, transboundary sharing, technical options for addressing growing regional water scarcity, and economic considerations. Difficult and bold decisions are required in both regions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-123
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Arid Environments
Volume112
Issue numberPA
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Jordan River
Colorado River
water management
river basin
rivers
river
base flow
water utilization
canals (waterways)
water shortages
water
supply balance
Western United States
momentum
Middle East
ownership
sewage
Israel
arid zones
water supply

Keywords

  • Groundwater
  • Surface water
  • Transboundary waters
  • Water policy
  • Water scarcity
  • Watershed management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Ecology

Cite this

A tale of two rivers : Pathways for improving water management in the Jordan and Colorado River basins. / Chen, Assaf; Abramson, Adam; Becker, Nir; Megdal, Sharon B.

In: Journal of Arid Environments, Vol. 112, No. PA, 01.01.2015, p. 109-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25c499cd22e649f180f0c2ab393e76d2,
title = "A tale of two rivers: Pathways for improving water management in the Jordan and Colorado River basins",
abstract = "This paper considers two river systems that have been subject to significant development during the last 60 years: the Jordan River in the Middle East and the Colorado River in the western United States. Both play major roles in serving the demands of growing populations, and climate change models predict both semi-arid to arid regions to become hotter and/or drier in the future. The Jordan River basin, shared by five nations, is already experiencing a critical level of environmental damage. Its lower stretch is practically a sewage canal with less than 10{\%} of its natural base-flow. Due to its unique historical, religious and environmental role, restoration efforts have gained momentum and wide public support. In the Colorado River Basin, water law is characterized by the {"}Law of the River{"} and water use is managed through regional allocation constraints. The Colorado River, shared by seven U.S. states and Mexico, is highly managed and over-allocated. Shortage declarations have serious implications for low priority users, with the Central Arizona Project being among the lowest. This makes large population centers and agricultural users vulnerable to curtailment of deliveries. We argue that there are common factors with respect to the policy and management options of these two basins that may provide insights into the similarities and divergences of their respective future pathways. These factors are: regional water supply and demand pressures, water governance, transboundary issues and demand for environmental flows. With a particular focus on the Israel and Arizona portions of these respective river basins, we address synergies and tradeoffs between groundwater and surface water usage, sectoral allocation strategies, public vs. private water ownership and legality, transboundary sharing, technical options for addressing growing regional water scarcity, and economic considerations. Difficult and bold decisions are required in both regions.",
keywords = "Groundwater, Surface water, Transboundary waters, Water policy, Water scarcity, Watershed management",
author = "Assaf Chen and Adam Abramson and Nir Becker and Megdal, {Sharon B}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.05.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "109--123",
journal = "Journal of Arid Environments",
issn = "0140-1963",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "PA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A tale of two rivers

T2 - Pathways for improving water management in the Jordan and Colorado River basins

AU - Chen, Assaf

AU - Abramson, Adam

AU - Becker, Nir

AU - Megdal, Sharon B

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - This paper considers two river systems that have been subject to significant development during the last 60 years: the Jordan River in the Middle East and the Colorado River in the western United States. Both play major roles in serving the demands of growing populations, and climate change models predict both semi-arid to arid regions to become hotter and/or drier in the future. The Jordan River basin, shared by five nations, is already experiencing a critical level of environmental damage. Its lower stretch is practically a sewage canal with less than 10% of its natural base-flow. Due to its unique historical, religious and environmental role, restoration efforts have gained momentum and wide public support. In the Colorado River Basin, water law is characterized by the "Law of the River" and water use is managed through regional allocation constraints. The Colorado River, shared by seven U.S. states and Mexico, is highly managed and over-allocated. Shortage declarations have serious implications for low priority users, with the Central Arizona Project being among the lowest. This makes large population centers and agricultural users vulnerable to curtailment of deliveries. We argue that there are common factors with respect to the policy and management options of these two basins that may provide insights into the similarities and divergences of their respective future pathways. These factors are: regional water supply and demand pressures, water governance, transboundary issues and demand for environmental flows. With a particular focus on the Israel and Arizona portions of these respective river basins, we address synergies and tradeoffs between groundwater and surface water usage, sectoral allocation strategies, public vs. private water ownership and legality, transboundary sharing, technical options for addressing growing regional water scarcity, and economic considerations. Difficult and bold decisions are required in both regions.

AB - This paper considers two river systems that have been subject to significant development during the last 60 years: the Jordan River in the Middle East and the Colorado River in the western United States. Both play major roles in serving the demands of growing populations, and climate change models predict both semi-arid to arid regions to become hotter and/or drier in the future. The Jordan River basin, shared by five nations, is already experiencing a critical level of environmental damage. Its lower stretch is practically a sewage canal with less than 10% of its natural base-flow. Due to its unique historical, religious and environmental role, restoration efforts have gained momentum and wide public support. In the Colorado River Basin, water law is characterized by the "Law of the River" and water use is managed through regional allocation constraints. The Colorado River, shared by seven U.S. states and Mexico, is highly managed and over-allocated. Shortage declarations have serious implications for low priority users, with the Central Arizona Project being among the lowest. This makes large population centers and agricultural users vulnerable to curtailment of deliveries. We argue that there are common factors with respect to the policy and management options of these two basins that may provide insights into the similarities and divergences of their respective future pathways. These factors are: regional water supply and demand pressures, water governance, transboundary issues and demand for environmental flows. With a particular focus on the Israel and Arizona portions of these respective river basins, we address synergies and tradeoffs between groundwater and surface water usage, sectoral allocation strategies, public vs. private water ownership and legality, transboundary sharing, technical options for addressing growing regional water scarcity, and economic considerations. Difficult and bold decisions are required in both regions.

KW - Groundwater

KW - Surface water

KW - Transboundary waters

KW - Water policy

KW - Water scarcity

KW - Watershed management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84909949431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84909949431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.05.017

DO - 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.05.017

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84909949431

VL - 112

SP - 109

EP - 123

JO - Journal of Arid Environments

JF - Journal of Arid Environments

SN - 0140-1963

IS - PA

ER -