A Technology Transition Model derived from field investigation of GSS use aboard the U.S.S. CORONADO

Robert O. Briggs, Mark Adkins, Daniel Mittleman, John Kruse, Scot Miller, Jay F Nunamaker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are several thousand group support systems (GSS) installations worldwide, and, while that number is growing, GSS has not yet achieved critical mass. One reason may be that it can take one to three years for an organization to complete a transition to GSS. Studying GSS transition in the field could yield insights that would allow for faster, lower-risk transitions elsewhere. This article presents a thirty-two-month qualitative field investigation of an effort to introduce GSS into the daily work of the staff of the U.S. Navy's Commander, Third Fleet. Using the principles of action research, the project began with interventions based on the precepts of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The goal of the interventions was to engender sufficient acceptance for GSS to create a self-sustaining, growing community of GSS users. Throughout the study, building on a base of experience developed in other private-and public-sector transition projects, we revised and extended TAM based on insights that emerge d in the field. The resulting model, the Technology Transition Model (TTM), frames acceptance as a multiplicative function of the magnitude and frequency of the perceived net value of a proposed change, moderated by the perceived net value associated with the transition period itself. TTM frames net value as having a number of dimensions, including cognitive, economic, political, social, affective, and physical. It posits that cognitive net value derives from at least three sources: changes in access, technical, and conceptual attention loads. GSS transition proceeded at different speeds in different segments of the Third Fleet; the intelligence and battle staffs became self-sustaining within weeks, while others are still not self-sustaining. TTM appears to explain the differences that emerged in the Navy community. The article presents TAM, then argues the propositions of TTM. It then presents background information about Third Fleet, and describes critical incidents in the transition effort that gave rise t o the model. It summarizes the lessons learned in the field by comparing the differing transition trajectories among Fleet staff segments in light of the model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-195
Number of pages45
JournalJournal of Management Information Systems
Volume15
Issue number3
StatePublished - Dec 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Group
acceptance
navy
staff
Values
Group support systems
action research
community
intelligence
private sector
incident
public sector
Trajectories
organization
Economics
economics
experience
Technology acceptance model
Staff
Navy

Keywords

  • Electronic meeting systems technology adoption
  • Field studies
  • Group support systems
  • Qualitative research
  • Technology acceptance
  • Technology diffusion
  • Technology transition
  • Technology transition model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Management Information Systems
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

A Technology Transition Model derived from field investigation of GSS use aboard the U.S.S. CORONADO. / Briggs, Robert O.; Adkins, Mark; Mittleman, Daniel; Kruse, John; Miller, Scot; Nunamaker, Jay F.

In: Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 15, No. 3, 12.1998, p. 151-195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Briggs, Robert O. ; Adkins, Mark ; Mittleman, Daniel ; Kruse, John ; Miller, Scot ; Nunamaker, Jay F. / A Technology Transition Model derived from field investigation of GSS use aboard the U.S.S. CORONADO. In: Journal of Management Information Systems. 1998 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 151-195.
@article{0d7454da1a7744b8bbf1e3602d04741f,
title = "A Technology Transition Model derived from field investigation of GSS use aboard the U.S.S. CORONADO",
abstract = "There are several thousand group support systems (GSS) installations worldwide, and, while that number is growing, GSS has not yet achieved critical mass. One reason may be that it can take one to three years for an organization to complete a transition to GSS. Studying GSS transition in the field could yield insights that would allow for faster, lower-risk transitions elsewhere. This article presents a thirty-two-month qualitative field investigation of an effort to introduce GSS into the daily work of the staff of the U.S. Navy's Commander, Third Fleet. Using the principles of action research, the project began with interventions based on the precepts of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The goal of the interventions was to engender sufficient acceptance for GSS to create a self-sustaining, growing community of GSS users. Throughout the study, building on a base of experience developed in other private-and public-sector transition projects, we revised and extended TAM based on insights that emerge d in the field. The resulting model, the Technology Transition Model (TTM), frames acceptance as a multiplicative function of the magnitude and frequency of the perceived net value of a proposed change, moderated by the perceived net value associated with the transition period itself. TTM frames net value as having a number of dimensions, including cognitive, economic, political, social, affective, and physical. It posits that cognitive net value derives from at least three sources: changes in access, technical, and conceptual attention loads. GSS transition proceeded at different speeds in different segments of the Third Fleet; the intelligence and battle staffs became self-sustaining within weeks, while others are still not self-sustaining. TTM appears to explain the differences that emerged in the Navy community. The article presents TAM, then argues the propositions of TTM. It then presents background information about Third Fleet, and describes critical incidents in the transition effort that gave rise t o the model. It summarizes the lessons learned in the field by comparing the differing transition trajectories among Fleet staff segments in light of the model.",
keywords = "Electronic meeting systems technology adoption, Field studies, Group support systems, Qualitative research, Technology acceptance, Technology diffusion, Technology transition, Technology transition model",
author = "Briggs, {Robert O.} and Mark Adkins and Daniel Mittleman and John Kruse and Scot Miller and Nunamaker, {Jay F}",
year = "1998",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "151--195",
journal = "Journal of Management Information Systems",
issn = "0742-1222",
publisher = "M.E. Sharpe Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Technology Transition Model derived from field investigation of GSS use aboard the U.S.S. CORONADO

AU - Briggs, Robert O.

AU - Adkins, Mark

AU - Mittleman, Daniel

AU - Kruse, John

AU - Miller, Scot

AU - Nunamaker, Jay F

PY - 1998/12

Y1 - 1998/12

N2 - There are several thousand group support systems (GSS) installations worldwide, and, while that number is growing, GSS has not yet achieved critical mass. One reason may be that it can take one to three years for an organization to complete a transition to GSS. Studying GSS transition in the field could yield insights that would allow for faster, lower-risk transitions elsewhere. This article presents a thirty-two-month qualitative field investigation of an effort to introduce GSS into the daily work of the staff of the U.S. Navy's Commander, Third Fleet. Using the principles of action research, the project began with interventions based on the precepts of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The goal of the interventions was to engender sufficient acceptance for GSS to create a self-sustaining, growing community of GSS users. Throughout the study, building on a base of experience developed in other private-and public-sector transition projects, we revised and extended TAM based on insights that emerge d in the field. The resulting model, the Technology Transition Model (TTM), frames acceptance as a multiplicative function of the magnitude and frequency of the perceived net value of a proposed change, moderated by the perceived net value associated with the transition period itself. TTM frames net value as having a number of dimensions, including cognitive, economic, political, social, affective, and physical. It posits that cognitive net value derives from at least three sources: changes in access, technical, and conceptual attention loads. GSS transition proceeded at different speeds in different segments of the Third Fleet; the intelligence and battle staffs became self-sustaining within weeks, while others are still not self-sustaining. TTM appears to explain the differences that emerged in the Navy community. The article presents TAM, then argues the propositions of TTM. It then presents background information about Third Fleet, and describes critical incidents in the transition effort that gave rise t o the model. It summarizes the lessons learned in the field by comparing the differing transition trajectories among Fleet staff segments in light of the model.

AB - There are several thousand group support systems (GSS) installations worldwide, and, while that number is growing, GSS has not yet achieved critical mass. One reason may be that it can take one to three years for an organization to complete a transition to GSS. Studying GSS transition in the field could yield insights that would allow for faster, lower-risk transitions elsewhere. This article presents a thirty-two-month qualitative field investigation of an effort to introduce GSS into the daily work of the staff of the U.S. Navy's Commander, Third Fleet. Using the principles of action research, the project began with interventions based on the precepts of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The goal of the interventions was to engender sufficient acceptance for GSS to create a self-sustaining, growing community of GSS users. Throughout the study, building on a base of experience developed in other private-and public-sector transition projects, we revised and extended TAM based on insights that emerge d in the field. The resulting model, the Technology Transition Model (TTM), frames acceptance as a multiplicative function of the magnitude and frequency of the perceived net value of a proposed change, moderated by the perceived net value associated with the transition period itself. TTM frames net value as having a number of dimensions, including cognitive, economic, political, social, affective, and physical. It posits that cognitive net value derives from at least three sources: changes in access, technical, and conceptual attention loads. GSS transition proceeded at different speeds in different segments of the Third Fleet; the intelligence and battle staffs became self-sustaining within weeks, while others are still not self-sustaining. TTM appears to explain the differences that emerged in the Navy community. The article presents TAM, then argues the propositions of TTM. It then presents background information about Third Fleet, and describes critical incidents in the transition effort that gave rise t o the model. It summarizes the lessons learned in the field by comparing the differing transition trajectories among Fleet staff segments in light of the model.

KW - Electronic meeting systems technology adoption

KW - Field studies

KW - Group support systems

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Technology acceptance

KW - Technology diffusion

KW - Technology transition

KW - Technology transition model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032223733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032223733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 151

EP - 195

JO - Journal of Management Information Systems

JF - Journal of Management Information Systems

SN - 0742-1222

IS - 3

ER -