A tool for assessing engagement in instructional contexts.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Engaging activities are enriching ones. To determine whether an instructional activity is engaging, it helps to divide an activity into separate domains, and to rate the activity for the degree to which it fosters engagement in each of the domains. A tool made up of six domains of instructional practice is described in this article, based on the literature of teacher-child interactions in classrooms. The tool's domains are: the challenge of the activity, level of implementation, quality of instructional discussion, quality of instructional feedback, and quality of procedural and substantive involvement. The tool is offered as a way to evaluate and enhance engagement of children in classroom interactions as well as of adults in clinical interactions. After examining samples of engagement taken from children in classroom activities according to this construct, the observational tool is then applied to the analysis of a therapy session involving an adult with aphasia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-56
Number of pages9
JournalSeminars in Speech and Language
Volume30
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aphasia
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing
  • LPN and LVN

Cite this

A tool for assessing engagement in instructional contexts. / Mastergeorge, Ann M.

In: Seminars in Speech and Language, Vol. 30, No. 1, 02.2009, p. 48-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ce1775f875f34d26b1b28fec843f4922,
title = "A tool for assessing engagement in instructional contexts.",
abstract = "Engaging activities are enriching ones. To determine whether an instructional activity is engaging, it helps to divide an activity into separate domains, and to rate the activity for the degree to which it fosters engagement in each of the domains. A tool made up of six domains of instructional practice is described in this article, based on the literature of teacher-child interactions in classrooms. The tool's domains are: the challenge of the activity, level of implementation, quality of instructional discussion, quality of instructional feedback, and quality of procedural and substantive involvement. The tool is offered as a way to evaluate and enhance engagement of children in classroom interactions as well as of adults in clinical interactions. After examining samples of engagement taken from children in classroom activities according to this construct, the observational tool is then applied to the analysis of a therapy session involving an adult with aphasia.",
author = "Mastergeorge, {Ann M}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "48--56",
journal = "Seminars in Speech and Language",
issn = "0734-0478",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A tool for assessing engagement in instructional contexts.

AU - Mastergeorge, Ann M

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - Engaging activities are enriching ones. To determine whether an instructional activity is engaging, it helps to divide an activity into separate domains, and to rate the activity for the degree to which it fosters engagement in each of the domains. A tool made up of six domains of instructional practice is described in this article, based on the literature of teacher-child interactions in classrooms. The tool's domains are: the challenge of the activity, level of implementation, quality of instructional discussion, quality of instructional feedback, and quality of procedural and substantive involvement. The tool is offered as a way to evaluate and enhance engagement of children in classroom interactions as well as of adults in clinical interactions. After examining samples of engagement taken from children in classroom activities according to this construct, the observational tool is then applied to the analysis of a therapy session involving an adult with aphasia.

AB - Engaging activities are enriching ones. To determine whether an instructional activity is engaging, it helps to divide an activity into separate domains, and to rate the activity for the degree to which it fosters engagement in each of the domains. A tool made up of six domains of instructional practice is described in this article, based on the literature of teacher-child interactions in classrooms. The tool's domains are: the challenge of the activity, level of implementation, quality of instructional discussion, quality of instructional feedback, and quality of procedural and substantive involvement. The tool is offered as a way to evaluate and enhance engagement of children in classroom interactions as well as of adults in clinical interactions. After examining samples of engagement taken from children in classroom activities according to this construct, the observational tool is then applied to the analysis of a therapy session involving an adult with aphasia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63649101807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=63649101807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19145550

AN - SCOPUS:63649101807

VL - 30

SP - 48

EP - 56

JO - Seminars in Speech and Language

JF - Seminars in Speech and Language

SN - 0734-0478

IS - 1

ER -