Aberration considerations in lens tolerancing

Eric Herman, Jose M Sasian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Often the tolerancing of an optical system is performed by treating the optical system as a black box in which the designer sets tolerances for perturbations and then runs a Monte Carlo analysis to determine the as-built performance. When the effects of the perturbations are not considered, the tolerances might result tighter than necessary, proper compensation might be missed, and manufacturing cost can be increased. By acquiring aberration sensitivity for each type of perturbation, an optical engineer can increase tolerances by ad hoc compensation. An aberration sensitivity evaluation can be performed quickly and can be incorporated into the initial lens design phase. A lens designer can find what surfaces or elements within the optical system will be problematic before any time-consuming Monte Carlo run is performed. In this paper we use aberration theory of plane symmetric systems to remove, to some useful extent, the black-box tolerancing approach and to provide some insights into tolerancing. The tolerance sensitivities that are analyzed are with respect to surface tilt, center thickness, index value, and radius. To analyze these perturbations, exact wavefront calculations are performed for the following aberrations: uniform astigmatism, uniform coma, linear astigmatism, distortion I, distortion II, spherical aberration, linear coma, quadratic astigmatism, and cubic distortion. We provide a discussion about how the aberration tolerancing analysis is useful.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)341-346
Number of pages6
JournalApplied Optics
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 20 2014

Fingerprint

Aberrations
aberration
Lenses
lenses
astigmatism
Optical systems
perturbation
coma
boxes
sensitivity
lens design
Wavefronts
engineers
manufacturing
costs
Engineers
radii
evaluation
Costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

Cite this

Aberration considerations in lens tolerancing. / Herman, Eric; Sasian, Jose M.

In: Applied Optics, No. 3, 20.01.2014, p. 341-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6db055ac46af4f52a6136e4bbf37242c,
title = "Aberration considerations in lens tolerancing",
abstract = "Often the tolerancing of an optical system is performed by treating the optical system as a black box in which the designer sets tolerances for perturbations and then runs a Monte Carlo analysis to determine the as-built performance. When the effects of the perturbations are not considered, the tolerances might result tighter than necessary, proper compensation might be missed, and manufacturing cost can be increased. By acquiring aberration sensitivity for each type of perturbation, an optical engineer can increase tolerances by ad hoc compensation. An aberration sensitivity evaluation can be performed quickly and can be incorporated into the initial lens design phase. A lens designer can find what surfaces or elements within the optical system will be problematic before any time-consuming Monte Carlo run is performed. In this paper we use aberration theory of plane symmetric systems to remove, to some useful extent, the black-box tolerancing approach and to provide some insights into tolerancing. The tolerance sensitivities that are analyzed are with respect to surface tilt, center thickness, index value, and radius. To analyze these perturbations, exact wavefront calculations are performed for the following aberrations: uniform astigmatism, uniform coma, linear astigmatism, distortion I, distortion II, spherical aberration, linear coma, quadratic astigmatism, and cubic distortion. We provide a discussion about how the aberration tolerancing analysis is useful.",
author = "Eric Herman and Sasian, {Jose M}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1364/AO.53.000341",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "341--346",
journal = "Applied Optics",
issn = "1559-128X",
publisher = "The Optical Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aberration considerations in lens tolerancing

AU - Herman, Eric

AU - Sasian, Jose M

PY - 2014/1/20

Y1 - 2014/1/20

N2 - Often the tolerancing of an optical system is performed by treating the optical system as a black box in which the designer sets tolerances for perturbations and then runs a Monte Carlo analysis to determine the as-built performance. When the effects of the perturbations are not considered, the tolerances might result tighter than necessary, proper compensation might be missed, and manufacturing cost can be increased. By acquiring aberration sensitivity for each type of perturbation, an optical engineer can increase tolerances by ad hoc compensation. An aberration sensitivity evaluation can be performed quickly and can be incorporated into the initial lens design phase. A lens designer can find what surfaces or elements within the optical system will be problematic before any time-consuming Monte Carlo run is performed. In this paper we use aberration theory of plane symmetric systems to remove, to some useful extent, the black-box tolerancing approach and to provide some insights into tolerancing. The tolerance sensitivities that are analyzed are with respect to surface tilt, center thickness, index value, and radius. To analyze these perturbations, exact wavefront calculations are performed for the following aberrations: uniform astigmatism, uniform coma, linear astigmatism, distortion I, distortion II, spherical aberration, linear coma, quadratic astigmatism, and cubic distortion. We provide a discussion about how the aberration tolerancing analysis is useful.

AB - Often the tolerancing of an optical system is performed by treating the optical system as a black box in which the designer sets tolerances for perturbations and then runs a Monte Carlo analysis to determine the as-built performance. When the effects of the perturbations are not considered, the tolerances might result tighter than necessary, proper compensation might be missed, and manufacturing cost can be increased. By acquiring aberration sensitivity for each type of perturbation, an optical engineer can increase tolerances by ad hoc compensation. An aberration sensitivity evaluation can be performed quickly and can be incorporated into the initial lens design phase. A lens designer can find what surfaces or elements within the optical system will be problematic before any time-consuming Monte Carlo run is performed. In this paper we use aberration theory of plane symmetric systems to remove, to some useful extent, the black-box tolerancing approach and to provide some insights into tolerancing. The tolerance sensitivities that are analyzed are with respect to surface tilt, center thickness, index value, and radius. To analyze these perturbations, exact wavefront calculations are performed for the following aberrations: uniform astigmatism, uniform coma, linear astigmatism, distortion I, distortion II, spherical aberration, linear coma, quadratic astigmatism, and cubic distortion. We provide a discussion about how the aberration tolerancing analysis is useful.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942363977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942363977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1364/AO.53.000341

DO - 10.1364/AO.53.000341

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84942363977

SP - 341

EP - 346

JO - Applied Optics

JF - Applied Optics

SN - 1559-128X

IS - 3

ER -