Absolute radiometric calibration of the noaa avhrr sensors

P. M. Teillet, P. N. Slater, Y. Mao, Y. Ding, B. Yuan, R. J. Bartell, Stuart F Biggar, R. P. Santer, R. D. Jackson, M. S. Moran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three different approaches are described for the absolute radiometric calibration of the two reflective channels of the NOAA AVHRR sensors. Method 1 relies on field measurements and refers to another calibrated satellite sensor that acquired high-resolution imagery on the same day as the AVHRR overpass. Method 2 makes no reference to another sensor and is essentially an extension of the reflectance-based calibration method developed at White Sands for the in-orbit calibration of Landsat TM and SPOT HRV data. Method 3 achieves a calibration by reference to another satellite sensor, but it differs significantly from the first approach in that no ground reflectance and atmospheric measurements are needed on overpass day. Calibration results have been obtained using these methods for four NOAA-9 AVHRR images and for one NOAA-10 AVHRR image. A significant degradation in NOAA-9 AVHRR responsivity has occurred since the prelaunch calibration and with time since launch. The responsivity of the NOAA-10 AVHRR has also degraded significantly compared to the prelaunch calibration. The suitabilities of using Method 2 with the Rogers Dry Lake site in California and using Methods 1 and 3 at White Sands are discussed. The results for Method 3, which requires no field measurements and makes use of a simplified atmospheric model, are very promising, implying that a reasonable calibration of satellite sensors may be relatively straightforward.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)196-207
Number of pages12
JournalProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Volume924
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 12 1988

Fingerprint

Radiometric Calibration
Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer
AVHRR
Advanced very high resolution radiometers (AVHRR)
Calibration
Sensor
sensors
Sensors
Responsivity
sands
Satellites
launch windows
Reflectance
reflectance
SPOT (French satellite)
Sand
atmospheric models
lakes
imagery
Landsat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Teillet, P. M., Slater, P. N., Mao, Y., Ding, Y., Yuan, B., Bartell, R. J., ... Moran, M. S. (1988). Absolute radiometric calibration of the noaa avhrr sensors. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 924, 196-207. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.945687

Absolute radiometric calibration of the noaa avhrr sensors. / Teillet, P. M.; Slater, P. N.; Mao, Y.; Ding, Y.; Yuan, B.; Bartell, R. J.; Biggar, Stuart F; Santer, R. P.; Jackson, R. D.; Moran, M. S.

In: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol. 924, 12.10.1988, p. 196-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Teillet, PM, Slater, PN, Mao, Y, Ding, Y, Yuan, B, Bartell, RJ, Biggar, SF, Santer, RP, Jackson, RD & Moran, MS 1988, 'Absolute radiometric calibration of the noaa avhrr sensors', Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 924, pp. 196-207. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.945687
Teillet, P. M. ; Slater, P. N. ; Mao, Y. ; Ding, Y. ; Yuan, B. ; Bartell, R. J. ; Biggar, Stuart F ; Santer, R. P. ; Jackson, R. D. ; Moran, M. S. / Absolute radiometric calibration of the noaa avhrr sensors. In: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. 1988 ; Vol. 924. pp. 196-207.
@article{4d3a0dc86fad4f71893033d2c3868ee8,
title = "Absolute radiometric calibration of the noaa avhrr sensors",
abstract = "Three different approaches are described for the absolute radiometric calibration of the two reflective channels of the NOAA AVHRR sensors. Method 1 relies on field measurements and refers to another calibrated satellite sensor that acquired high-resolution imagery on the same day as the AVHRR overpass. Method 2 makes no reference to another sensor and is essentially an extension of the reflectance-based calibration method developed at White Sands for the in-orbit calibration of Landsat TM and SPOT HRV data. Method 3 achieves a calibration by reference to another satellite sensor, but it differs significantly from the first approach in that no ground reflectance and atmospheric measurements are needed on overpass day. Calibration results have been obtained using these methods for four NOAA-9 AVHRR images and for one NOAA-10 AVHRR image. A significant degradation in NOAA-9 AVHRR responsivity has occurred since the prelaunch calibration and with time since launch. The responsivity of the NOAA-10 AVHRR has also degraded significantly compared to the prelaunch calibration. The suitabilities of using Method 2 with the Rogers Dry Lake site in California and using Methods 1 and 3 at White Sands are discussed. The results for Method 3, which requires no field measurements and makes use of a simplified atmospheric model, are very promising, implying that a reasonable calibration of satellite sensors may be relatively straightforward.",
author = "Teillet, {P. M.} and Slater, {P. N.} and Y. Mao and Y. Ding and B. Yuan and Bartell, {R. J.} and Biggar, {Stuart F} and Santer, {R. P.} and Jackson, {R. D.} and Moran, {M. S.}",
year = "1988",
month = "10",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1117/12.945687",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "924",
pages = "196--207",
journal = "Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering",
issn = "0277-786X",
publisher = "SPIE",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absolute radiometric calibration of the noaa avhrr sensors

AU - Teillet, P. M.

AU - Slater, P. N.

AU - Mao, Y.

AU - Ding, Y.

AU - Yuan, B.

AU - Bartell, R. J.

AU - Biggar, Stuart F

AU - Santer, R. P.

AU - Jackson, R. D.

AU - Moran, M. S.

PY - 1988/10/12

Y1 - 1988/10/12

N2 - Three different approaches are described for the absolute radiometric calibration of the two reflective channels of the NOAA AVHRR sensors. Method 1 relies on field measurements and refers to another calibrated satellite sensor that acquired high-resolution imagery on the same day as the AVHRR overpass. Method 2 makes no reference to another sensor and is essentially an extension of the reflectance-based calibration method developed at White Sands for the in-orbit calibration of Landsat TM and SPOT HRV data. Method 3 achieves a calibration by reference to another satellite sensor, but it differs significantly from the first approach in that no ground reflectance and atmospheric measurements are needed on overpass day. Calibration results have been obtained using these methods for four NOAA-9 AVHRR images and for one NOAA-10 AVHRR image. A significant degradation in NOAA-9 AVHRR responsivity has occurred since the prelaunch calibration and with time since launch. The responsivity of the NOAA-10 AVHRR has also degraded significantly compared to the prelaunch calibration. The suitabilities of using Method 2 with the Rogers Dry Lake site in California and using Methods 1 and 3 at White Sands are discussed. The results for Method 3, which requires no field measurements and makes use of a simplified atmospheric model, are very promising, implying that a reasonable calibration of satellite sensors may be relatively straightforward.

AB - Three different approaches are described for the absolute radiometric calibration of the two reflective channels of the NOAA AVHRR sensors. Method 1 relies on field measurements and refers to another calibrated satellite sensor that acquired high-resolution imagery on the same day as the AVHRR overpass. Method 2 makes no reference to another sensor and is essentially an extension of the reflectance-based calibration method developed at White Sands for the in-orbit calibration of Landsat TM and SPOT HRV data. Method 3 achieves a calibration by reference to another satellite sensor, but it differs significantly from the first approach in that no ground reflectance and atmospheric measurements are needed on overpass day. Calibration results have been obtained using these methods for four NOAA-9 AVHRR images and for one NOAA-10 AVHRR image. A significant degradation in NOAA-9 AVHRR responsivity has occurred since the prelaunch calibration and with time since launch. The responsivity of the NOAA-10 AVHRR has also degraded significantly compared to the prelaunch calibration. The suitabilities of using Method 2 with the Rogers Dry Lake site in California and using Methods 1 and 3 at White Sands are discussed. The results for Method 3, which requires no field measurements and makes use of a simplified atmospheric model, are very promising, implying that a reasonable calibration of satellite sensors may be relatively straightforward.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937700574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937700574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/12.945687

DO - 10.1117/12.945687

M3 - Article

VL - 924

SP - 196

EP - 207

JO - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

JF - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

SN - 0277-786X

ER -