Accuracy and confidence in perceptions of targets’ attachment to former partners

Do judges vary as a function of individual differences in attachment orientation?

Jessica L. Borelli, Xiaolin Peng, Kajung Hong, Nicole M. Froidevaux, David A Sbarra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study builds on prior research by examining the degree to which individual differences in judges’ attachment orientations predict their accuracy and confidence in rating targets’ ongoing attachment to former partners. Targets were recently separated/divorced adults (N = 132) who described their separation experiences. Naïve judges (NStudy 1 = 93, NStudy 2 = 296) read transcripts of targets’ separation narratives and rated targets’ strength of ongoing attachment to their former partners. Judges’ high accuracy did not vary by judges’ attachment orientations. However, greater judge avoidance was associated with lower confidence in ratings. Greater attachment anxiety was linked with weaker associations between accuracy and confidence. We discuss findings in terms of their potential implications for partner selection and future studies that can assess this link.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Research in Personality
Volume79
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Divorce
Individuality
Anxiety
Research

Keywords

  • Accuracy in person perception
  • Attachment
  • Confidence
  • Divorce
  • Partner selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Accuracy and confidence in perceptions of targets’ attachment to former partners : Do judges vary as a function of individual differences in attachment orientation? / Borelli, Jessica L.; Peng, Xiaolin; Hong, Kajung; Froidevaux, Nicole M.; Sbarra, David A.

In: Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 79, 01.04.2019, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0f7a8ff328b945b08a1061d18fe9909e,
title = "Accuracy and confidence in perceptions of targets’ attachment to former partners: Do judges vary as a function of individual differences in attachment orientation?",
abstract = "This study builds on prior research by examining the degree to which individual differences in judges’ attachment orientations predict their accuracy and confidence in rating targets’ ongoing attachment to former partners. Targets were recently separated/divorced adults (N = 132) who described their separation experiences. Na{\"i}ve judges (NStudy 1 = 93, NStudy 2 = 296) read transcripts of targets’ separation narratives and rated targets’ strength of ongoing attachment to their former partners. Judges’ high accuracy did not vary by judges’ attachment orientations. However, greater judge avoidance was associated with lower confidence in ratings. Greater attachment anxiety was linked with weaker associations between accuracy and confidence. We discuss findings in terms of their potential implications for partner selection and future studies that can assess this link.",
keywords = "Accuracy in person perception, Attachment, Confidence, Divorce, Partner selection",
author = "Borelli, {Jessica L.} and Xiaolin Peng and Kajung Hong and Froidevaux, {Nicole M.} and Sbarra, {David A}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jrp.2019.01.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Journal of Research in Personality",
issn = "0092-6566",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy and confidence in perceptions of targets’ attachment to former partners

T2 - Do judges vary as a function of individual differences in attachment orientation?

AU - Borelli, Jessica L.

AU - Peng, Xiaolin

AU - Hong, Kajung

AU - Froidevaux, Nicole M.

AU - Sbarra, David A

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - This study builds on prior research by examining the degree to which individual differences in judges’ attachment orientations predict their accuracy and confidence in rating targets’ ongoing attachment to former partners. Targets were recently separated/divorced adults (N = 132) who described their separation experiences. Naïve judges (NStudy 1 = 93, NStudy 2 = 296) read transcripts of targets’ separation narratives and rated targets’ strength of ongoing attachment to their former partners. Judges’ high accuracy did not vary by judges’ attachment orientations. However, greater judge avoidance was associated with lower confidence in ratings. Greater attachment anxiety was linked with weaker associations between accuracy and confidence. We discuss findings in terms of their potential implications for partner selection and future studies that can assess this link.

AB - This study builds on prior research by examining the degree to which individual differences in judges’ attachment orientations predict their accuracy and confidence in rating targets’ ongoing attachment to former partners. Targets were recently separated/divorced adults (N = 132) who described their separation experiences. Naïve judges (NStudy 1 = 93, NStudy 2 = 296) read transcripts of targets’ separation narratives and rated targets’ strength of ongoing attachment to their former partners. Judges’ high accuracy did not vary by judges’ attachment orientations. However, greater judge avoidance was associated with lower confidence in ratings. Greater attachment anxiety was linked with weaker associations between accuracy and confidence. We discuss findings in terms of their potential implications for partner selection and future studies that can assess this link.

KW - Accuracy in person perception

KW - Attachment

KW - Confidence

KW - Divorce

KW - Partner selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061006864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061006864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.01.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.01.001

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Journal of Research in Personality

JF - Journal of Research in Personality

SN - 0092-6566

ER -