Accuracy of information maintained by us credit bureaus: Frequency of errors and effects on consumers' credit scores

L. Douglas Smith, Michael Staten, Thomas Eyssell, Maureen Karig, Beth A. Freeborn, Andrea Golden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

A representative sample of 1,000 US consumers reviewed their credit reports from the three major US credit bureaus with help from university research associates. Twenty-six percent of study participants claimed to find at least one potentially material error and filed formal disputes with the relevant bureau(s). For 78% of the 263 consumers who filed disputes (20% of participants overall) at least one bureau altered the credit report accordingly. Thirty-three percent of disputants (8.7% of participants) experienced a resulting increase of 10+ points in one or more of their FICO® scores; 21% of disputants (5.5% of study participants) had one or more scores cross a threshold that would typically result in more favorable terms of credit. Our findings suggest that credit-bureau data are accurate enough to facilitate efficient lending and creditors' management of accounts, but individual consumers need to be vigilant to protect themselves against potentially costly errors in their files.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)588-601
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Consumer Affairs
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy of information maintained by us credit bureaus: Frequency of errors and effects on consumers' credit scores'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this