Accuracy of North American human skeleton ages

Thomas W. Stafford, P. E. Hare, Lloyd Currie, A. J.T. Jull, Douglas Donahue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon dates fail to provide conclusive evidence that all New World human fossils are younger than approximately 11,000 yr. Because fossil bones vary widely in preservation, their radiocarbon dates are not equally accurate. Molecular-level radiocarbon dating, which used individual amino acids to assess fossil diagenesis, revealed that dates on known-age, noncollagenous bone were underestimated by at least 2000 to 9000 yr. The significance is that >11,000-yr-old fossil bones with poor preservation would yield Holocene and not Pleistocene radiocarbon ages, regardless of what chemical pretreatment or 14C counting method was used. Irreplaceable evidence for Pleistocene-age fossils in the New World could be lost if the diagenesis of fossil bones is not evaluated before the bones are radiocarbon dated. In contrast, radiocarbon ages for collagenous fossils can be determined more accurately if 14C is measured in several individual amino acids that are isolated from collagenous bone protein. Molecular-level radiocarbon dating will greatly improve not only the accuracy of chronologies for human migrations and animal extinctions, but of all late Quaternary chronologies that are based upon the 14C dating of fossil proteins.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-120
Number of pages10
JournalQuaternary Research
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1990

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy of North American human skeleton ages'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Stafford, T. W., Hare, P. E., Currie, L., Jull, A. J. T., & Donahue, D. (1990). Accuracy of North American human skeleton ages. Quaternary Research, 34(1), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(90)90076-W