Acute coronary syndromes: Initial evaluation and risk stratification

Raghunandan Kamineni, Joseph S Alpert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chest pain, the second most frequent presenting complaint in the emergency department (ED), often poses a challenge to the physicians dealing with these patients owing to the wide spectrum of presentation of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). A majority of the patients presenting with chest pain are usually admitted to the hospital for further evaluation and management. Despite the availability of modern-day tools for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), about 5% of patients with AMI are missed in the ED with subsequent associated morbidity and mortality and legal consequences. Several centers have adapted critical pathways derived from American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for the management of patients presenting with ACS. We now have some evidence suggesting adherence to the critical pathways derived from ACC/AHA guidelines will optimize the quality of patient care and probably result in better patient outcomes. This article reviews initial evaluation and the importance of risk stratification of the patients presenting with chest pain using the currently available clinical and diagnostic tools. Critical pathways derived from the ACC/AHA guidelines for various presentations of ACS are also reviewed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-392
Number of pages14
JournalProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases
Volume46
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2004

Fingerprint

Acute Coronary Syndrome
Critical Pathways
Chest Pain
American Heart Association
Guidelines
Cardiology
Hospital Emergency Service
Myocardial Infarction
Quality of Health Care
Patient Care
Morbidity
Physicians
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Acute coronary syndromes : Initial evaluation and risk stratification. / Kamineni, Raghunandan; Alpert, Joseph S.

In: Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, Vol. 46, No. 5, 03.2004, p. 379-392.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f973e107adc247a79a9767ae9b571140,
title = "Acute coronary syndromes: Initial evaluation and risk stratification",
abstract = "Chest pain, the second most frequent presenting complaint in the emergency department (ED), often poses a challenge to the physicians dealing with these patients owing to the wide spectrum of presentation of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). A majority of the patients presenting with chest pain are usually admitted to the hospital for further evaluation and management. Despite the availability of modern-day tools for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), about 5{\%} of patients with AMI are missed in the ED with subsequent associated morbidity and mortality and legal consequences. Several centers have adapted critical pathways derived from American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for the management of patients presenting with ACS. We now have some evidence suggesting adherence to the critical pathways derived from ACC/AHA guidelines will optimize the quality of patient care and probably result in better patient outcomes. This article reviews initial evaluation and the importance of risk stratification of the patients presenting with chest pain using the currently available clinical and diagnostic tools. Critical pathways derived from the ACC/AHA guidelines for various presentations of ACS are also reviewed.",
author = "Raghunandan Kamineni and Alpert, {Joseph S}",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.pcad.2003.12.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "379--392",
journal = "Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases",
issn = "0033-0620",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acute coronary syndromes

T2 - Initial evaluation and risk stratification

AU - Kamineni, Raghunandan

AU - Alpert, Joseph S

PY - 2004/3

Y1 - 2004/3

N2 - Chest pain, the second most frequent presenting complaint in the emergency department (ED), often poses a challenge to the physicians dealing with these patients owing to the wide spectrum of presentation of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). A majority of the patients presenting with chest pain are usually admitted to the hospital for further evaluation and management. Despite the availability of modern-day tools for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), about 5% of patients with AMI are missed in the ED with subsequent associated morbidity and mortality and legal consequences. Several centers have adapted critical pathways derived from American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for the management of patients presenting with ACS. We now have some evidence suggesting adherence to the critical pathways derived from ACC/AHA guidelines will optimize the quality of patient care and probably result in better patient outcomes. This article reviews initial evaluation and the importance of risk stratification of the patients presenting with chest pain using the currently available clinical and diagnostic tools. Critical pathways derived from the ACC/AHA guidelines for various presentations of ACS are also reviewed.

AB - Chest pain, the second most frequent presenting complaint in the emergency department (ED), often poses a challenge to the physicians dealing with these patients owing to the wide spectrum of presentation of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). A majority of the patients presenting with chest pain are usually admitted to the hospital for further evaluation and management. Despite the availability of modern-day tools for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), about 5% of patients with AMI are missed in the ED with subsequent associated morbidity and mortality and legal consequences. Several centers have adapted critical pathways derived from American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for the management of patients presenting with ACS. We now have some evidence suggesting adherence to the critical pathways derived from ACC/AHA guidelines will optimize the quality of patient care and probably result in better patient outcomes. This article reviews initial evaluation and the importance of risk stratification of the patients presenting with chest pain using the currently available clinical and diagnostic tools. Critical pathways derived from the ACC/AHA guidelines for various presentations of ACS are also reviewed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2442663803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2442663803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pcad.2003.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.pcad.2003.12.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 15179627

AN - SCOPUS:2442663803

VL - 46

SP - 379

EP - 392

JO - Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

JF - Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

SN - 0033-0620

IS - 5

ER -