Acute vs. prolonged screening for spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain

Martin E Weinand, Hassan Madhusudan, Bennett Davis, Miguel Melgar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was performed to test the hypothesis that pain relief data during acute (15 minute intraoperative) and prolonged (5 day) SCS screening have equivalent predictive value for long-term successful SCS control of chronic low back pain and/or lower extremity pain. A retrospective series of patients with chronic low back and/or lower extremity pain underwent either percutaneous or open (ie, laminectomy) SCS implantation during which acute intraoperative followed by prolonged screening trials for percentage pain relief (%PR) were performed. Data were analyzed for (a) correlation between positive predictive value (PPV) of acute and prolonged SCS screening for %PR and (b) PPV of acute vs. prolonged screening %PR for long-term SCS %PR. Fifty-four patients (male/female = 38/16; mean age ± SEM = 54.2 ± 2.0 years) underwent thoracic (T) (mean level = T9.1 ± 0.4) percutaneous (n = 33) and laminectomy (n = 21) implantation of SCS for acute (15 minute intraoperative) and prolonged (5.0 ± 0.3 days) SCS screening of pain relief. Correlation between successful (> 50%PR) pain relief during acute (n = 53/54, PPV = 98%) and prolonged (n = 47/52, PPV = 90%) screening was significant (Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient, SRCC = 0.462, p < 0.01). After permanent SCS implantation, at mean follow-up = 9.4 ± 1.5 months, acute and prolonged SCS screening %PR PPV's were each statistically significant for predicting long-term SCS relief of chronic pain (n = 31/38, PPV = 82% and n = 31/36, PPV = 86%, SRCC = 0.462 and 0.433, respectively, p < 0.01). We conclude that successful pain relief during acute SCS screening is highly correlated with successful prolonged SCS screening of chronic low back and/ or lower extremity pain relief. Acute and prolonged SCS screening appear to have equivalent predictive value for successful long-term SCS control of chronic low back and/or lower extremity pain. These preliminary results suggest potential justification for eliminating prolonged and retaining acute (intraoperative) SCS screening for selection of permanent SCS implantation candidates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-19
Number of pages5
JournalNeuromodulation
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2003

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Stimulation
Chronic Pain
Pain
Lower Extremity
Laminectomy

Keywords

  • Chronic low back pain
  • Sciatica
  • Spinal cord stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Acute vs. prolonged screening for spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain. / Weinand, Martin E; Madhusudan, Hassan; Davis, Bennett; Melgar, Miguel.

In: Neuromodulation, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.2003, p. 15-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weinand, Martin E ; Madhusudan, Hassan ; Davis, Bennett ; Melgar, Miguel. / Acute vs. prolonged screening for spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain. In: Neuromodulation. 2003 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 15-19.
@article{93128e61764340f3ad2624f31948ad95,
title = "Acute vs. prolonged screening for spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain",
abstract = "Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was performed to test the hypothesis that pain relief data during acute (15 minute intraoperative) and prolonged (5 day) SCS screening have equivalent predictive value for long-term successful SCS control of chronic low back pain and/or lower extremity pain. A retrospective series of patients with chronic low back and/or lower extremity pain underwent either percutaneous or open (ie, laminectomy) SCS implantation during which acute intraoperative followed by prolonged screening trials for percentage pain relief ({\%}PR) were performed. Data were analyzed for (a) correlation between positive predictive value (PPV) of acute and prolonged SCS screening for {\%}PR and (b) PPV of acute vs. prolonged screening {\%}PR for long-term SCS {\%}PR. Fifty-four patients (male/female = 38/16; mean age ± SEM = 54.2 ± 2.0 years) underwent thoracic (T) (mean level = T9.1 ± 0.4) percutaneous (n = 33) and laminectomy (n = 21) implantation of SCS for acute (15 minute intraoperative) and prolonged (5.0 ± 0.3 days) SCS screening of pain relief. Correlation between successful (> 50{\%}PR) pain relief during acute (n = 53/54, PPV = 98{\%}) and prolonged (n = 47/52, PPV = 90{\%}) screening was significant (Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient, SRCC = 0.462, p < 0.01). After permanent SCS implantation, at mean follow-up = 9.4 ± 1.5 months, acute and prolonged SCS screening {\%}PR PPV's were each statistically significant for predicting long-term SCS relief of chronic pain (n = 31/38, PPV = 82{\%} and n = 31/36, PPV = 86{\%}, SRCC = 0.462 and 0.433, respectively, p < 0.01). We conclude that successful pain relief during acute SCS screening is highly correlated with successful prolonged SCS screening of chronic low back and/ or lower extremity pain relief. Acute and prolonged SCS screening appear to have equivalent predictive value for successful long-term SCS control of chronic low back and/or lower extremity pain. These preliminary results suggest potential justification for eliminating prolonged and retaining acute (intraoperative) SCS screening for selection of permanent SCS implantation candidates.",
keywords = "Chronic low back pain, Sciatica, Spinal cord stimulation",
author = "Weinand, {Martin E} and Hassan Madhusudan and Bennett Davis and Miguel Melgar",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1046/j.1525-1403.2003.03002.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "15--19",
journal = "Neuromodulation",
issn = "1094-7159",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acute vs. prolonged screening for spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain

AU - Weinand, Martin E

AU - Madhusudan, Hassan

AU - Davis, Bennett

AU - Melgar, Miguel

PY - 2003/1

Y1 - 2003/1

N2 - Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was performed to test the hypothesis that pain relief data during acute (15 minute intraoperative) and prolonged (5 day) SCS screening have equivalent predictive value for long-term successful SCS control of chronic low back pain and/or lower extremity pain. A retrospective series of patients with chronic low back and/or lower extremity pain underwent either percutaneous or open (ie, laminectomy) SCS implantation during which acute intraoperative followed by prolonged screening trials for percentage pain relief (%PR) were performed. Data were analyzed for (a) correlation between positive predictive value (PPV) of acute and prolonged SCS screening for %PR and (b) PPV of acute vs. prolonged screening %PR for long-term SCS %PR. Fifty-four patients (male/female = 38/16; mean age ± SEM = 54.2 ± 2.0 years) underwent thoracic (T) (mean level = T9.1 ± 0.4) percutaneous (n = 33) and laminectomy (n = 21) implantation of SCS for acute (15 minute intraoperative) and prolonged (5.0 ± 0.3 days) SCS screening of pain relief. Correlation between successful (> 50%PR) pain relief during acute (n = 53/54, PPV = 98%) and prolonged (n = 47/52, PPV = 90%) screening was significant (Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient, SRCC = 0.462, p < 0.01). After permanent SCS implantation, at mean follow-up = 9.4 ± 1.5 months, acute and prolonged SCS screening %PR PPV's were each statistically significant for predicting long-term SCS relief of chronic pain (n = 31/38, PPV = 82% and n = 31/36, PPV = 86%, SRCC = 0.462 and 0.433, respectively, p < 0.01). We conclude that successful pain relief during acute SCS screening is highly correlated with successful prolonged SCS screening of chronic low back and/ or lower extremity pain relief. Acute and prolonged SCS screening appear to have equivalent predictive value for successful long-term SCS control of chronic low back and/or lower extremity pain. These preliminary results suggest potential justification for eliminating prolonged and retaining acute (intraoperative) SCS screening for selection of permanent SCS implantation candidates.

AB - Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was performed to test the hypothesis that pain relief data during acute (15 minute intraoperative) and prolonged (5 day) SCS screening have equivalent predictive value for long-term successful SCS control of chronic low back pain and/or lower extremity pain. A retrospective series of patients with chronic low back and/or lower extremity pain underwent either percutaneous or open (ie, laminectomy) SCS implantation during which acute intraoperative followed by prolonged screening trials for percentage pain relief (%PR) were performed. Data were analyzed for (a) correlation between positive predictive value (PPV) of acute and prolonged SCS screening for %PR and (b) PPV of acute vs. prolonged screening %PR for long-term SCS %PR. Fifty-four patients (male/female = 38/16; mean age ± SEM = 54.2 ± 2.0 years) underwent thoracic (T) (mean level = T9.1 ± 0.4) percutaneous (n = 33) and laminectomy (n = 21) implantation of SCS for acute (15 minute intraoperative) and prolonged (5.0 ± 0.3 days) SCS screening of pain relief. Correlation between successful (> 50%PR) pain relief during acute (n = 53/54, PPV = 98%) and prolonged (n = 47/52, PPV = 90%) screening was significant (Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient, SRCC = 0.462, p < 0.01). After permanent SCS implantation, at mean follow-up = 9.4 ± 1.5 months, acute and prolonged SCS screening %PR PPV's were each statistically significant for predicting long-term SCS relief of chronic pain (n = 31/38, PPV = 82% and n = 31/36, PPV = 86%, SRCC = 0.462 and 0.433, respectively, p < 0.01). We conclude that successful pain relief during acute SCS screening is highly correlated with successful prolonged SCS screening of chronic low back and/ or lower extremity pain relief. Acute and prolonged SCS screening appear to have equivalent predictive value for successful long-term SCS control of chronic low back and/or lower extremity pain. These preliminary results suggest potential justification for eliminating prolonged and retaining acute (intraoperative) SCS screening for selection of permanent SCS implantation candidates.

KW - Chronic low back pain

KW - Sciatica

KW - Spinal cord stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037870094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037870094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1525-1403.2003.03002.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1525-1403.2003.03002.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22150909

AN - SCOPUS:0037870094

VL - 6

SP - 15

EP - 19

JO - Neuromodulation

JF - Neuromodulation

SN - 1094-7159

IS - 1

ER -