Adults Fail to Learn a Type of Linguistic Pattern that is Readily Learned by Infants

Louann Gerken, Carolyn Quam, Lisa Goffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Beginning with the classic work of Shepard, Hovland, & Jenkins (1961), Type II visual patterns (e.g., exemplars are large white squares OR small black triangles) have held a special place in investigations of human learning. Recent research on Type II linguistic patterns has shown that they are relatively frequent across languages and more frequent than Type IV family resemblance patterns (e.g., exemplars have 2 out of 3 defining features). Research has also shown that human infants are adept at learning Type II patterns from very few exemplars, but adult learning appears to be more mixed. Because no study had directly compared adults and infants, Experiment 1 tested both groups on the same input and test stimuli. Adults at best showed weak learning of one of two Type II patterns, but infants showed robust learning of both patterns. Experiment 2 contrasted adults’ ability to learn a Type II pattern with a Type IV pattern. Adults only showed learning of the latter, replicating previous research with different stimuli and testing procedures. Thus, adults are unable to learn a frequent linguistic pattern, one readily learned by infants. Implications for possible language learning differences between infants and adults are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalLanguage Learning and Development
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

infant
linguistics
learning
stimulus
testing procedure
experiment
language
ability
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Adults Fail to Learn a Type of Linguistic Pattern that is Readily Learned by Infants. / Gerken, Louann; Quam, Carolyn; Goffman, Lisa.

In: Language Learning and Development, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e4cc1b6653be40a28bbe2ed3de4aff1f,
title = "Adults Fail to Learn a Type of Linguistic Pattern that is Readily Learned by Infants",
abstract = "Beginning with the classic work of Shepard, Hovland, & Jenkins (1961), Type II visual patterns (e.g., exemplars are large white squares OR small black triangles) have held a special place in investigations of human learning. Recent research on Type II linguistic patterns has shown that they are relatively frequent across languages and more frequent than Type IV family resemblance patterns (e.g., exemplars have 2 out of 3 defining features). Research has also shown that human infants are adept at learning Type II patterns from very few exemplars, but adult learning appears to be more mixed. Because no study had directly compared adults and infants, Experiment 1 tested both groups on the same input and test stimuli. Adults at best showed weak learning of one of two Type II patterns, but infants showed robust learning of both patterns. Experiment 2 contrasted adults’ ability to learn a Type II pattern with a Type IV pattern. Adults only showed learning of the latter, replicating previous research with different stimuli and testing procedures. Thus, adults are unable to learn a frequent linguistic pattern, one readily learned by infants. Implications for possible language learning differences between infants and adults are discussed.",
author = "Louann Gerken and Carolyn Quam and Lisa Goffman",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15475441.2019.1617149",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Language Learning and Development",
issn = "1547-5441",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adults Fail to Learn a Type of Linguistic Pattern that is Readily Learned by Infants

AU - Gerken, Louann

AU - Quam, Carolyn

AU - Goffman, Lisa

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Beginning with the classic work of Shepard, Hovland, & Jenkins (1961), Type II visual patterns (e.g., exemplars are large white squares OR small black triangles) have held a special place in investigations of human learning. Recent research on Type II linguistic patterns has shown that they are relatively frequent across languages and more frequent than Type IV family resemblance patterns (e.g., exemplars have 2 out of 3 defining features). Research has also shown that human infants are adept at learning Type II patterns from very few exemplars, but adult learning appears to be more mixed. Because no study had directly compared adults and infants, Experiment 1 tested both groups on the same input and test stimuli. Adults at best showed weak learning of one of two Type II patterns, but infants showed robust learning of both patterns. Experiment 2 contrasted adults’ ability to learn a Type II pattern with a Type IV pattern. Adults only showed learning of the latter, replicating previous research with different stimuli and testing procedures. Thus, adults are unable to learn a frequent linguistic pattern, one readily learned by infants. Implications for possible language learning differences between infants and adults are discussed.

AB - Beginning with the classic work of Shepard, Hovland, & Jenkins (1961), Type II visual patterns (e.g., exemplars are large white squares OR small black triangles) have held a special place in investigations of human learning. Recent research on Type II linguistic patterns has shown that they are relatively frequent across languages and more frequent than Type IV family resemblance patterns (e.g., exemplars have 2 out of 3 defining features). Research has also shown that human infants are adept at learning Type II patterns from very few exemplars, but adult learning appears to be more mixed. Because no study had directly compared adults and infants, Experiment 1 tested both groups on the same input and test stimuli. Adults at best showed weak learning of one of two Type II patterns, but infants showed robust learning of both patterns. Experiment 2 contrasted adults’ ability to learn a Type II pattern with a Type IV pattern. Adults only showed learning of the latter, replicating previous research with different stimuli and testing procedures. Thus, adults are unable to learn a frequent linguistic pattern, one readily learned by infants. Implications for possible language learning differences between infants and adults are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066836568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066836568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15475441.2019.1617149

DO - 10.1080/15475441.2019.1617149

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85066836568

JO - Language Learning and Development

JF - Language Learning and Development

SN - 1547-5441

ER -