Affective Consistency and Sorting

Nicholas T. Davis, Samara M Klar, Christopher Weber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Sorting is often portrayed as a mechanistic response to elite polarization: individuals recognize salient differences between the parties and match their preferences accordingly. Much less is known, however, about the psychological and motivational processes that contribute to it. In particular, how might affective reactions to elites shape convergence among political preferences?. Method: To explore the relationship between the consistency of self-reported affect and sorting, we analyze cross-sectional and panel data from the American National Election Studies. Results: On balance, we find that negative emotions directed toward the opposing party candidate and positive emotions toward one's own party candidate are associated with an increase in the alignment of ideological and partisan preferences. Conclusion: These findings illustrate how affect contributes to consistency in mass opinion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSocial Science Quarterly
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

emotion
elite
candidacy
election research
polarization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Affective Consistency and Sorting. / Davis, Nicholas T.; Klar, Samara M; Weber, Christopher.

In: Social Science Quarterly, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9b9fd84845de4e0fa8ab3faeb76cf05c,
title = "Affective Consistency and Sorting",
abstract = "Objective: Sorting is often portrayed as a mechanistic response to elite polarization: individuals recognize salient differences between the parties and match their preferences accordingly. Much less is known, however, about the psychological and motivational processes that contribute to it. In particular, how might affective reactions to elites shape convergence among political preferences?. Method: To explore the relationship between the consistency of self-reported affect and sorting, we analyze cross-sectional and panel data from the American National Election Studies. Results: On balance, we find that negative emotions directed toward the opposing party candidate and positive emotions toward one's own party candidate are associated with an increase in the alignment of ideological and partisan preferences. Conclusion: These findings illustrate how affect contributes to consistency in mass opinion.",
author = "Davis, {Nicholas T.} and Klar, {Samara M} and Christopher Weber",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ssqu.12695",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Social Science Quarterly",
issn = "0038-4941",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Affective Consistency and Sorting

AU - Davis, Nicholas T.

AU - Klar, Samara M

AU - Weber, Christopher

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: Sorting is often portrayed as a mechanistic response to elite polarization: individuals recognize salient differences between the parties and match their preferences accordingly. Much less is known, however, about the psychological and motivational processes that contribute to it. In particular, how might affective reactions to elites shape convergence among political preferences?. Method: To explore the relationship between the consistency of self-reported affect and sorting, we analyze cross-sectional and panel data from the American National Election Studies. Results: On balance, we find that negative emotions directed toward the opposing party candidate and positive emotions toward one's own party candidate are associated with an increase in the alignment of ideological and partisan preferences. Conclusion: These findings illustrate how affect contributes to consistency in mass opinion.

AB - Objective: Sorting is often portrayed as a mechanistic response to elite polarization: individuals recognize salient differences between the parties and match their preferences accordingly. Much less is known, however, about the psychological and motivational processes that contribute to it. In particular, how might affective reactions to elites shape convergence among political preferences?. Method: To explore the relationship between the consistency of self-reported affect and sorting, we analyze cross-sectional and panel data from the American National Election Studies. Results: On balance, we find that negative emotions directed toward the opposing party candidate and positive emotions toward one's own party candidate are associated with an increase in the alignment of ideological and partisan preferences. Conclusion: These findings illustrate how affect contributes to consistency in mass opinion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071022108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071022108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ssqu.12695

DO - 10.1111/ssqu.12695

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85071022108

JO - Social Science Quarterly

JF - Social Science Quarterly

SN - 0038-4941

ER -