Affective polarization or partisan disdain? Untangling a dislike for the opposing party from a dislike of partisanship

Samara M Klar, Yanna Krupnikov, John Barry Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent scholarship suggests that American partisans dislike other party members so much that partisanship has become the main social divide in modern politics. We argue that at least one measure of this “affective polarization” conflates a dislike for members of the other party with a dislike for partisanship in general. The measure asks people how they feel about their child marrying someone from another party. What seems like negative affect toward the other party is, in fact, negative affect toward partisans from either side of the aisle and political discussion in general. Relying on two national experiments, we demonstrate that although some Americans are politically polarized, more simply want to avoid talking about politics. In fact, many people do not want their child to marry someone from their own party if that hypothetical in-law were to discuss politics frequently. Supplementary analyses using ANES feeling thermometers show that inparty feeling thermometer ratings have decreased in recent years among weak and leaning partisans. As a result, the feeling thermometer results confirm the conclusion from the experiments. Polarization is a phenomenon concentrated in the one-third of Americans who consider themselves strong partisans. More individuals are averse to partisan politics. The analyses demonstrate how affective polarization exists alongside weakening partisan identities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-390
Number of pages12
JournalPublic Opinion Quarterly
Volume82
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Thermometers
polarization
Polarization
politics
party member
experiment
Experiments
rating
Law
Partisan
Partisanship
Dislike
Affective

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Affective polarization or partisan disdain? Untangling a dislike for the opposing party from a dislike of partisanship. / Klar, Samara M; Krupnikov, Yanna; Ryan, John Barry.

In: Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 82, No. 2, 01.01.2018, p. 379-390.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7d349f2feed5430f827001dc423ba4f0,
title = "Affective polarization or partisan disdain? Untangling a dislike for the opposing party from a dislike of partisanship",
abstract = "Recent scholarship suggests that American partisans dislike other party members so much that partisanship has become the main social divide in modern politics. We argue that at least one measure of this “affective polarization” conflates a dislike for members of the other party with a dislike for partisanship in general. The measure asks people how they feel about their child marrying someone from another party. What seems like negative affect toward the other party is, in fact, negative affect toward partisans from either side of the aisle and political discussion in general. Relying on two national experiments, we demonstrate that although some Americans are politically polarized, more simply want to avoid talking about politics. In fact, many people do not want their child to marry someone from their own party if that hypothetical in-law were to discuss politics frequently. Supplementary analyses using ANES feeling thermometers show that inparty feeling thermometer ratings have decreased in recent years among weak and leaning partisans. As a result, the feeling thermometer results confirm the conclusion from the experiments. Polarization is a phenomenon concentrated in the one-third of Americans who consider themselves strong partisans. More individuals are averse to partisan politics. The analyses demonstrate how affective polarization exists alongside weakening partisan identities.",
author = "Klar, {Samara M} and Yanna Krupnikov and Ryan, {John Barry}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/poq/nfy014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "379--390",
journal = "Public Opinion Quarterly",
issn = "0033-362X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Affective polarization or partisan disdain? Untangling a dislike for the opposing party from a dislike of partisanship

AU - Klar, Samara M

AU - Krupnikov, Yanna

AU - Ryan, John Barry

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Recent scholarship suggests that American partisans dislike other party members so much that partisanship has become the main social divide in modern politics. We argue that at least one measure of this “affective polarization” conflates a dislike for members of the other party with a dislike for partisanship in general. The measure asks people how they feel about their child marrying someone from another party. What seems like negative affect toward the other party is, in fact, negative affect toward partisans from either side of the aisle and political discussion in general. Relying on two national experiments, we demonstrate that although some Americans are politically polarized, more simply want to avoid talking about politics. In fact, many people do not want their child to marry someone from their own party if that hypothetical in-law were to discuss politics frequently. Supplementary analyses using ANES feeling thermometers show that inparty feeling thermometer ratings have decreased in recent years among weak and leaning partisans. As a result, the feeling thermometer results confirm the conclusion from the experiments. Polarization is a phenomenon concentrated in the one-third of Americans who consider themselves strong partisans. More individuals are averse to partisan politics. The analyses demonstrate how affective polarization exists alongside weakening partisan identities.

AB - Recent scholarship suggests that American partisans dislike other party members so much that partisanship has become the main social divide in modern politics. We argue that at least one measure of this “affective polarization” conflates a dislike for members of the other party with a dislike for partisanship in general. The measure asks people how they feel about their child marrying someone from another party. What seems like negative affect toward the other party is, in fact, negative affect toward partisans from either side of the aisle and political discussion in general. Relying on two national experiments, we demonstrate that although some Americans are politically polarized, more simply want to avoid talking about politics. In fact, many people do not want their child to marry someone from their own party if that hypothetical in-law were to discuss politics frequently. Supplementary analyses using ANES feeling thermometers show that inparty feeling thermometer ratings have decreased in recent years among weak and leaning partisans. As a result, the feeling thermometer results confirm the conclusion from the experiments. Polarization is a phenomenon concentrated in the one-third of Americans who consider themselves strong partisans. More individuals are averse to partisan politics. The analyses demonstrate how affective polarization exists alongside weakening partisan identities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054507859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054507859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/poq/nfy014

DO - 10.1093/poq/nfy014

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 379

EP - 390

JO - Public Opinion Quarterly

JF - Public Opinion Quarterly

SN - 0033-362X

IS - 2

ER -