Affix-favored contrast inequity and psycholinguistic grounding for non-concatenative morphology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Focusing on a cross-linguistically unusual contrast inequity between stems and affixes, this paper argues for an approach to morphological patterning based on psycholinguistically-relevant factors. These factors include neighborhood density and token frequency, which play an important role in lexical retrieval. The paper first shows that the proposed root-affix faithfulness metaconstraint of McCarthy and Prince (1995) is factually incorrect, given the existence of patterns in which affixes control the phonology of stems. The paper then turns in detail to the case of Modern Hebrew, and shows that despite the unusual features normally associated with nonconcatenative morphology the morphophonological patterning observed there is readily explained once factors relating to lexical retrieval are taken into consideration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-125
Number of pages19
JournalMorphology
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2006

Fingerprint

Grounding
Affix
Psycholinguistics
Lexical Retrieval
Nonconcatenative Morphology
Faithfulness
Modern Hebrew
Phonology
Neighborhood Density

Keywords

  • Affix faithfulness
  • Contrast
  • Lexical access
  • Neighborhood density
  • Root faithfulness
  • Semitic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Affix-favored contrast inequity and psycholinguistic grounding for non-concatenative morphology. / Ussishkin, Adam P.

In: Morphology, Vol. 16, No. 1, 07.2006, p. 107-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5a62b46081644c189e69538d754c71f8,
title = "Affix-favored contrast inequity and psycholinguistic grounding for non-concatenative morphology",
abstract = "Focusing on a cross-linguistically unusual contrast inequity between stems and affixes, this paper argues for an approach to morphological patterning based on psycholinguistically-relevant factors. These factors include neighborhood density and token frequency, which play an important role in lexical retrieval. The paper first shows that the proposed root-affix faithfulness metaconstraint of McCarthy and Prince (1995) is factually incorrect, given the existence of patterns in which affixes control the phonology of stems. The paper then turns in detail to the case of Modern Hebrew, and shows that despite the unusual features normally associated with nonconcatenative morphology the morphophonological patterning observed there is readily explained once factors relating to lexical retrieval are taken into consideration.",
keywords = "Affix faithfulness, Contrast, Lexical access, Neighborhood density, Root faithfulness, Semitic",
author = "Ussishkin, {Adam P}",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s11525-006-0005-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "107--125",
journal = "Morphology",
issn = "1871-5621",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Affix-favored contrast inequity and psycholinguistic grounding for non-concatenative morphology

AU - Ussishkin, Adam P

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - Focusing on a cross-linguistically unusual contrast inequity between stems and affixes, this paper argues for an approach to morphological patterning based on psycholinguistically-relevant factors. These factors include neighborhood density and token frequency, which play an important role in lexical retrieval. The paper first shows that the proposed root-affix faithfulness metaconstraint of McCarthy and Prince (1995) is factually incorrect, given the existence of patterns in which affixes control the phonology of stems. The paper then turns in detail to the case of Modern Hebrew, and shows that despite the unusual features normally associated with nonconcatenative morphology the morphophonological patterning observed there is readily explained once factors relating to lexical retrieval are taken into consideration.

AB - Focusing on a cross-linguistically unusual contrast inequity between stems and affixes, this paper argues for an approach to morphological patterning based on psycholinguistically-relevant factors. These factors include neighborhood density and token frequency, which play an important role in lexical retrieval. The paper first shows that the proposed root-affix faithfulness metaconstraint of McCarthy and Prince (1995) is factually incorrect, given the existence of patterns in which affixes control the phonology of stems. The paper then turns in detail to the case of Modern Hebrew, and shows that despite the unusual features normally associated with nonconcatenative morphology the morphophonological patterning observed there is readily explained once factors relating to lexical retrieval are taken into consideration.

KW - Affix faithfulness

KW - Contrast

KW - Lexical access

KW - Neighborhood density

KW - Root faithfulness

KW - Semitic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749527514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749527514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11525-006-0005-3

DO - 10.1007/s11525-006-0005-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33749527514

VL - 16

SP - 107

EP - 125

JO - Morphology

JF - Morphology

SN - 1871-5621

IS - 1

ER -