AHP as a means for improving public participation: A pre-post experiment with university students

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Students enrolled in a course in natural resources management and economics at the University of Arizona tested the application of the multi-criteria decision method, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), to a national forest planning situation. The students first used an intuitive method and then the AHP method to express their preferences for eight possible wilderness sites that were characterized and thus differentiated by 19 criteria. The sites were located in the Coronado National Forest in southeastern Arizona, USA. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was calculated to test for correlation between the rankings generated by the intuitive decision method and the AHP method. The Spearman's tests indicated for 16 of the 20 students a lack of correlation between individual rankings by the two methods thus suggesting that the AHP can influence preference rankings. Questionnaire responses by the students indicated that the AHP requires closer scrutiny and a more comprehensive consideration of all criteria than does an intuitive preference ranking approach. This study demonstrates that the AHP offers potential for actual application as a public participation tool.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)501-514
Number of pages14
JournalForest Policy and Economics
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005

Fingerprint

college students
student
students
ranking
participation
university
experiment
Coronado National Forest
natural resource economics
multi-criteria decision making
methodology
wilderness
national forests
natural resource management
questionnaires
planning
testing
method
public participation
Experiment

Keywords

  • Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
  • Arid lands
  • Forest planning
  • Multi-criteria decision-making
  • Pre-post experiment
  • Public involvement
  • Public participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

AHP as a means for improving public participation : A pre-post experiment with university students. / Crimmins, Theresa M; Desteiguer, Joseph E; Dennis, Donald.

In: Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 7, No. 4, 05.2005, p. 501-514.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c347b197040f4a4eb89803dcf36451ba,
title = "AHP as a means for improving public participation: A pre-post experiment with university students",
abstract = "Students enrolled in a course in natural resources management and economics at the University of Arizona tested the application of the multi-criteria decision method, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), to a national forest planning situation. The students first used an intuitive method and then the AHP method to express their preferences for eight possible wilderness sites that were characterized and thus differentiated by 19 criteria. The sites were located in the Coronado National Forest in southeastern Arizona, USA. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was calculated to test for correlation between the rankings generated by the intuitive decision method and the AHP method. The Spearman's tests indicated for 16 of the 20 students a lack of correlation between individual rankings by the two methods thus suggesting that the AHP can influence preference rankings. Questionnaire responses by the students indicated that the AHP requires closer scrutiny and a more comprehensive consideration of all criteria than does an intuitive preference ranking approach. This study demonstrates that the AHP offers potential for actual application as a public participation tool.",
keywords = "Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Arid lands, Forest planning, Multi-criteria decision-making, Pre-post experiment, Public involvement, Public participation",
author = "Crimmins, {Theresa M} and Desteiguer, {Joseph E} and Donald Dennis",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.forpol.2003.08.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "501--514",
journal = "Forest Policy and Economics",
issn = "1389-9341",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - AHP as a means for improving public participation

T2 - A pre-post experiment with university students

AU - Crimmins, Theresa M

AU - Desteiguer, Joseph E

AU - Dennis, Donald

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - Students enrolled in a course in natural resources management and economics at the University of Arizona tested the application of the multi-criteria decision method, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), to a national forest planning situation. The students first used an intuitive method and then the AHP method to express their preferences for eight possible wilderness sites that were characterized and thus differentiated by 19 criteria. The sites were located in the Coronado National Forest in southeastern Arizona, USA. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was calculated to test for correlation between the rankings generated by the intuitive decision method and the AHP method. The Spearman's tests indicated for 16 of the 20 students a lack of correlation between individual rankings by the two methods thus suggesting that the AHP can influence preference rankings. Questionnaire responses by the students indicated that the AHP requires closer scrutiny and a more comprehensive consideration of all criteria than does an intuitive preference ranking approach. This study demonstrates that the AHP offers potential for actual application as a public participation tool.

AB - Students enrolled in a course in natural resources management and economics at the University of Arizona tested the application of the multi-criteria decision method, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), to a national forest planning situation. The students first used an intuitive method and then the AHP method to express their preferences for eight possible wilderness sites that were characterized and thus differentiated by 19 criteria. The sites were located in the Coronado National Forest in southeastern Arizona, USA. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was calculated to test for correlation between the rankings generated by the intuitive decision method and the AHP method. The Spearman's tests indicated for 16 of the 20 students a lack of correlation between individual rankings by the two methods thus suggesting that the AHP can influence preference rankings. Questionnaire responses by the students indicated that the AHP requires closer scrutiny and a more comprehensive consideration of all criteria than does an intuitive preference ranking approach. This study demonstrates that the AHP offers potential for actual application as a public participation tool.

KW - Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

KW - Arid lands

KW - Forest planning

KW - Multi-criteria decision-making

KW - Pre-post experiment

KW - Public involvement

KW - Public participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13444309637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13444309637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.forpol.2003.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.forpol.2003.08.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:13444309637

VL - 7

SP - 501

EP - 514

JO - Forest Policy and Economics

JF - Forest Policy and Economics

SN - 1389-9341

IS - 4

ER -