Airway pressure as a measure of gas exchange during high-frequency jet ventilation

C. K. Waterson, H. W. Militzer, Stuart F Quan, J. M. Calkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Airway pressure during high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) reflects safety, ventilator performance, and gas exchange. The value of airway pressure as a monitoring and control variable for predicting the effectiveness of gas exchange was examined in 2 studies using healthy dogs. In the first study, HFJV was delivered to the airway via an extra lumen in the wall of an endotracheal tube, at a frequency of 150 cycle/min and 30% inspiratory time. Airway pressures (peak, mean, trough) were measured at various locations, from 5 cm below to 30 cm above the jet port. Pressures measured above the jet were misleading, but the proper measurement distance below the jet remains uncertain. The second study used the same ventilator settings but varied the airway pressure difference between peak and end-expiratory pressures (2, 4, or 6 cm H2O), and either the mean airway pressure (6 or 10 cm H2O), or the positive end-expiratory pressure (0, 5, 10, or 15 cm H2O). The airway pressure difference correlated strongly with efficiency of gas exchange for both CO2 elimination and oxygenation. Mean and end-expiratory pressures showed little influence over moderate ranges, but use of 15 cm H2O of PEEP decreased efficiency over both CO2 elimination and oxygenation, presumably due to increased dead space because of lung overdistension. We conclude that the airway pressure difference, measured as far distal in the airway as is safe and practical, and be useful for monitoring and controlling HFJV.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)742-746
Number of pages5
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume12
Issue number9
StatePublished - 1984

Fingerprint

High-Frequency Jet Ventilation
Gases
Pressure
Mechanical Ventilators
Positive-Pressure Respiration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Waterson, C. K., Militzer, H. W., Quan, S. F., & Calkins, J. M. (1984). Airway pressure as a measure of gas exchange during high-frequency jet ventilation. Critical Care Medicine, 12(9), 742-746.

Airway pressure as a measure of gas exchange during high-frequency jet ventilation. / Waterson, C. K.; Militzer, H. W.; Quan, Stuart F; Calkins, J. M.

In: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 9, 1984, p. 742-746.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Waterson, CK, Militzer, HW, Quan, SF & Calkins, JM 1984, 'Airway pressure as a measure of gas exchange during high-frequency jet ventilation', Critical Care Medicine, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 742-746.
Waterson, C. K. ; Militzer, H. W. ; Quan, Stuart F ; Calkins, J. M. / Airway pressure as a measure of gas exchange during high-frequency jet ventilation. In: Critical Care Medicine. 1984 ; Vol. 12, No. 9. pp. 742-746.
@article{f31a8033ec72400cb34efa939cd50d03,
title = "Airway pressure as a measure of gas exchange during high-frequency jet ventilation",
abstract = "Airway pressure during high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) reflects safety, ventilator performance, and gas exchange. The value of airway pressure as a monitoring and control variable for predicting the effectiveness of gas exchange was examined in 2 studies using healthy dogs. In the first study, HFJV was delivered to the airway via an extra lumen in the wall of an endotracheal tube, at a frequency of 150 cycle/min and 30{\%} inspiratory time. Airway pressures (peak, mean, trough) were measured at various locations, from 5 cm below to 30 cm above the jet port. Pressures measured above the jet were misleading, but the proper measurement distance below the jet remains uncertain. The second study used the same ventilator settings but varied the airway pressure difference between peak and end-expiratory pressures (2, 4, or 6 cm H2O), and either the mean airway pressure (6 or 10 cm H2O), or the positive end-expiratory pressure (0, 5, 10, or 15 cm H2O). The airway pressure difference correlated strongly with efficiency of gas exchange for both CO2 elimination and oxygenation. Mean and end-expiratory pressures showed little influence over moderate ranges, but use of 15 cm H2O of PEEP decreased efficiency over both CO2 elimination and oxygenation, presumably due to increased dead space because of lung overdistension. We conclude that the airway pressure difference, measured as far distal in the airway as is safe and practical, and be useful for monitoring and controlling HFJV.",
author = "Waterson, {C. K.} and Militzer, {H. W.} and Quan, {Stuart F} and Calkins, {J. M.}",
year = "1984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "742--746",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Airway pressure as a measure of gas exchange during high-frequency jet ventilation

AU - Waterson, C. K.

AU - Militzer, H. W.

AU - Quan, Stuart F

AU - Calkins, J. M.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - Airway pressure during high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) reflects safety, ventilator performance, and gas exchange. The value of airway pressure as a monitoring and control variable for predicting the effectiveness of gas exchange was examined in 2 studies using healthy dogs. In the first study, HFJV was delivered to the airway via an extra lumen in the wall of an endotracheal tube, at a frequency of 150 cycle/min and 30% inspiratory time. Airway pressures (peak, mean, trough) were measured at various locations, from 5 cm below to 30 cm above the jet port. Pressures measured above the jet were misleading, but the proper measurement distance below the jet remains uncertain. The second study used the same ventilator settings but varied the airway pressure difference between peak and end-expiratory pressures (2, 4, or 6 cm H2O), and either the mean airway pressure (6 or 10 cm H2O), or the positive end-expiratory pressure (0, 5, 10, or 15 cm H2O). The airway pressure difference correlated strongly with efficiency of gas exchange for both CO2 elimination and oxygenation. Mean and end-expiratory pressures showed little influence over moderate ranges, but use of 15 cm H2O of PEEP decreased efficiency over both CO2 elimination and oxygenation, presumably due to increased dead space because of lung overdistension. We conclude that the airway pressure difference, measured as far distal in the airway as is safe and practical, and be useful for monitoring and controlling HFJV.

AB - Airway pressure during high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) reflects safety, ventilator performance, and gas exchange. The value of airway pressure as a monitoring and control variable for predicting the effectiveness of gas exchange was examined in 2 studies using healthy dogs. In the first study, HFJV was delivered to the airway via an extra lumen in the wall of an endotracheal tube, at a frequency of 150 cycle/min and 30% inspiratory time. Airway pressures (peak, mean, trough) were measured at various locations, from 5 cm below to 30 cm above the jet port. Pressures measured above the jet were misleading, but the proper measurement distance below the jet remains uncertain. The second study used the same ventilator settings but varied the airway pressure difference between peak and end-expiratory pressures (2, 4, or 6 cm H2O), and either the mean airway pressure (6 or 10 cm H2O), or the positive end-expiratory pressure (0, 5, 10, or 15 cm H2O). The airway pressure difference correlated strongly with efficiency of gas exchange for both CO2 elimination and oxygenation. Mean and end-expiratory pressures showed little influence over moderate ranges, but use of 15 cm H2O of PEEP decreased efficiency over both CO2 elimination and oxygenation, presumably due to increased dead space because of lung overdistension. We conclude that the airway pressure difference, measured as far distal in the airway as is safe and practical, and be useful for monitoring and controlling HFJV.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021130087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021130087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6432437

AN - SCOPUS:0021130087

VL - 12

SP - 742

EP - 746

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 9

ER -